Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST150F
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
92 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Portability
96 Imaging
40 Features
30 Overall
36
96 Imaging
40 Features
30 Overall
36
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST150F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released May 2012
Samsung ST150F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Launched January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST150F Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST150F, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR300 (16MP) and the ST150F (16MP) is fairly similar and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-ZR300 was brought out 7 months prior to the ST150F so they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-ZR300 grades vs the ST150F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST150F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 and Samsung ST150F. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR300 Gallery and Samsung ST150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR300 over the Samsung ST150F
| EX-ZR300 | ST150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the Casio EX-ZR300
| ST150F | EX-ZR300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | May 2012 | Fresher by 7 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR300 and Samsung ST150F
| EX-ZR300 | ST150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST150F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR300 features physical dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung ST150F has proportions of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST150F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZR300 compared to the ST150F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR300 and ST150F is 92 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST150F Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing just by reading a spec sheet. The graphic here may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR300 and ST150F.
Clearly, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution so you should expect similar quality of files however you really should take the release date of the products into consideration. The older EX-ZR300 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR300
Portrait photography with Samsung ST150F
manual focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
has face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Street photography factors
Samsung ST150F Street photography factors
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (205g)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
lighter than average (114 grams)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Sports photography info
Samsung ST150F Sports photography info
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
great battery pack (500 shots)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
good megapixels (16MP)
has tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Travel photography info
Samsung ST150F Travel photography info
great battery pack (500 CIPA)
lighter than competition in class (205 grams)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
does not posses selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.0)
lighter than average (114g)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung ST150F Landscape photography highlights
manual focus
really wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
great battery pack (500 CIPA)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
does not have Timelapse mode
relatively wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3")
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
does not have Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR300 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung ST150F as a Vlogging camera
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (205 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
does not have external microphone support
relatively wide (25mm)
has face detect focusing
lighter than average (114g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have mic jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-ZR300 vs Samsung ST150F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung ST150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR300 | Samsung ST150F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-05-22 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 1s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) | 114 grams (0.25 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $329 | $300 |