Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB250F
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB250F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is fairly close and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR10 was launched 3 years earlier than the WB250F and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-ZR10 matches up against the WB250F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 & Samsung WB250F. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Samsung WB250F
| EX-ZR10 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Casio EX-ZR10
| WB250F | EX-ZR10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | September 2010 | More recent by 28 months |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung WB250F
| EX-ZR10 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR10 provides outside dimensions of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB250F has measurements of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB250F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR10 vs the WB250F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR10 and WB250F is 93 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to see the gap in sensor measurements purely by viewing specifications. The visual here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR10 and WB250F.
Plainly, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Samsung WB250F to result in extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics much more aggressively. The older EX-ZR10 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung WB250F |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 176g (0.39 lbs) | 226g (0.50 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $190 | $250 |