Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung NX5
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
80 Imaging
54 Features
50 Overall
52
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung NX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 499g - 123 x 87 x 40mm
- Released June 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung NX5: A Hands-On Comparison of Compact Superzoom and Entry-Level Mirrorless Cameras
Choosing the right camera often boils down to understanding how you shoot and what features genuinely move the needle for your photography or videography ambitions. Today, I bring you a detailed, hands-on comparison between two notably different cameras - the Casio EX-ZR100, a compact superzoom powerhouse, and the Samsung NX5, an entry-level mirrorless camera designed to introduce enthusiasts to interchangeable lenses and larger sensors.
Having spent countless hours evaluating cameras over my 15 years in the industry, I’ll dissect both devices across the key axes of performance, build, features, and value. My goal is to help you match these cameras to your personal shooting style and needs - whether you’re a travel blogger, hobbyist wildlife shooter, or just starting your journey into mirrorless photography.
Let’s dive in.
First Impression: Size, Handling, and Ergonomics
When you pick up the Casio EX-ZR100 and the Samsung NX5 side-by-side, size and handling differences are immediately apparent.

The Casio EX-ZR100 is delightfully compact, weighing just 204 grams and measuring a modest 105x59x29 mm. Its pocket-friendly form factor is designed for casual shooting and travel ease. In contrast, the Samsung NX5 is significantly larger and heavier - 499 grams and 123x87x40 mm. It adopts a classic SLR-style mirrorless design with a deeper grip, providing a more secure hold, especially with larger lenses attached. The NX5's solid heft signals a camera meant for serious photographic engagement.
Personally, if portability and discretion top your priority list - say, for street photography or city travel - the Casio’s lightweight footprint may appeal. But if you’re used to DSLR ergonomics or want more control and flexibility, the NX5 naturally feels more substantial and camera-like in-hand.
Design and Control Layout: Intuitive or Clunky?
A camera’s usability hinges on thoughtful control placement and interface clarity. Here's how these two stack up:

The EX-ZR100, being a compact superzoom with a fixed lens, features minimalist but accessible physical controls - ideal for quick point-and-shoot operations. Its top panel is clean, with simplified dials for shooting modes, and a relatively small display. However, it lacks an electronic viewfinder (EVF) altogether, relying solely on a 3-inch LCD.
The NX5 brings a more traditional flagship feel: a full mode dial, a larger shutter button, and an EVF with 100% coverage and 0.57x magnification, which makes composing in bright daylight far more comfortable. Its screen, though smaller in resolution compared to the Casio, benefits from OLED technology that offers deeper blacks and vivid colors.
I often find that cameras with an EVF allow for steadier shooting and less eye fatigue during longer sessions - something the NX5 offers and the EX-ZR100 misses.
Peering Inside: Sensor Size and Image Quality Considerations
Perhaps the most fundamental difference lies beneath the lens with sensor size and technology - the bedrock of image quality.

The Casio EX-ZR100 is equipped with a 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS sensor measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm, offering 12 megapixels resolution. This sensor size is typical for compact superzooms but has intrinsic limitations in noise performance, dynamic range, and depth of field control.
The Samsung NX5, on the other hand, sports a 23.4 x 15.6 mm APS-C sized CMOS sensor with 15 megapixels. That’s over ten times the sensor area of the Casio, yielding significant advantages in image quality. Think richer tone gradation, better low-light handling, and true background separation for portraits from prime lenses.
In practical shooting tests, the NX5 delivers clearer, sharper images with less noise at all but the lowest ISO values. The Casio’s images are good for casual sharing but can feel a touch soft or noisy when examined closely, especially in low light.
This core sensor distinction also influences your creative capabilities - say, how professional portraits with creamy bokeh render on the NX5 but remain out of reach for the EX-ZR100’s smaller sensor and f/3.0-5.9 lens.
Shooting Experience: Autofocus and Burst Performance
How swiftly and accurately a camera focuses is crucial for dynamics like wildlife or sports, but also just everyday snaps.
The EX-ZR100 employs contrast-detection autofocus with no phase detection, known for accuracy but sometimes slower when hunting for focus. The camera supports single and tracking autofocus but no continuous AF during bursts. That said, its 40 frames per second burst rate is impressive, albeit at lower resolution or computationally limited modes.
The Samsung NX5 uses contrast-detection AF with 15 selectable points and includes face detection, yielding more reliable focus on portraits or moving subjects. It shoots at just 3 fps burst, modest by modern standards, but with consistent focusing.
From real-world experience, if you prioritize fast, instinctive shooting of fleeting moments, the EX-ZR100’s high burst may tempt you, especially for casual action shots. But when precise focus tracking is paramount - sports, wildlife - the NX5’s dependable single-servo autofocus with manual override shines, even if the frame rate is lower.
Image Stabilization and Lens Versatility
One benefit of the EX-ZR100 is built-in sensor-shift image stabilization, a rarity in compact superzooms of its era. This helps handhold longer focal lengths without blur, especially at night. For travel or casual outdoor use, I found this feature invaluable.
The NX5 lacks in-body stabilization but compensates by supporting a growing Samsung NX lens system with 32 lenses available, including primes and telephotos with optical stabilization where needed. You can tailor your setup precisely - whether macro, portrait, or telephoto - something the fixed-lens Casio cannot match.
Overall, if lens flexibility matters and you want to invest in quality optics, the NX5 far exceeds the Casio's fixed lens option. But if simplicity and versatility in one package appeal, the Casio offers a decent solution.
Viewing and Interface: Screen Quality and Usability
Both cameras use 3-inch LCDs, but let’s look at their practical differences.

The Casio EX-ZR100 features a "Super Clear TFT" color screen with 461k dots resolution - sharp, bright, and great for composing in daylight. However, its fixed angle and lack of touch functionality limit shooting flexibility and menu navigation speed.
The Samsung NX5 offers an AMOLED screen of 230k dots - less resolution but with excellent color depth and contrast. Despite lacking touch, the NX5 complements it with an EVF, enhancing overall framing experience.
In use, I appreciated the Casio screen's visibility but missed the EVF for long shooting sessions. The NX5 strikes a balance, especially in bright outdoor conditions, where glare hits are less intrusive behind the viewfinder.
Crafting Images: Photography Styles and Performance Across Genres
How do these cameras perform in your favorite photography disciplines?
Portrait Photography
The NX5’s larger APS-C sensor and interchangeable lenses deliver natural skin tones, beautiful bokeh, and accurate face detection autofocus - necessary for compelling portraits. The Casio’s fixed lens and small sensor limit background blur and precise eye detection.
Landscape Photography
The NX5’s resolution (15 MP vs 12 MP) and wider dynamic range yield images with better detail and tonality. Its larger sensor excels in RAW shooting (supported only by NX5), accommodating post-processing stretching the dynamic range. The Casio, lacking RAW, is more limited here. Neither offers weather sealing, so protective gear is advised outdoors.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
The NX5’s limited burst speed (3 fps) and contrast AF struggle to keep up with fast subjects, while EX-ZR100’s impressive 40 fps burst rate (albeit at lower resolution or with limitations) offers a creative edge for casual shooting. Yet, the Casio’s slow AF and fixed telephoto aperture limit image quality and precision.
Street Photography
Here, the Casio’s compact size and quiet operation (silent shutter modes are unavailable, but mechanical noise is less than DSLRs) suit candid, discreet shooting. The NX5’s larger size is more obtrusive on street but offers EVF framing advantage, especially under bright sun.
Macro Photography
Both cameras lack specialized macro features, but the NX5’s ability to adopt dedicated macro lenses gives it a clear edge. The Casio’s fixed lens macro range isn’t specified, limiting close-up flexibility.
Night/Astro Photography
The NX5 shines here due to its larger sensor, better ISO handling, and manual exposure modes - you can confidently shoot stars or urban night scenes. The Casio’s small sensor delivers more noise, and higher ISO struggles to maintain detail.
Video Capabilities: Casual Clips or Creative Production?
Video specs reflect each camera’s intended market.
The Casio EX-ZR100 shoots Full HD 1080p at 30 fps, with higher frame rates at reduced resolution for slow-motion effects (up to 1000 fps in 224x64 pixels, obviously a novelty). It offers H.264 encoding but lacks microphone or headphone ports, limiting audio control.
The Samsung NX5, meanwhile, records HD 720p at 30 fps only, again without external audio support. Video performance is clearly secondary here.
In my tests, Casio’s video looked sharper and smoother, making it better for casual home movies or social media clips, whereas the NX5 is more stills-centric.
Durability, Battery Life, and Storage
Neither camera offers weatherproofing or ruggedized bodies. Casio’s lightweight build rather favors casual, careful use; Samsung’s bulkier shell feels sturdier but still requires some caution.
Battery life tips the scales heavily toward the NX5, rated for approximately 400 shots per charge compared to no official rating from Casio but expectedly shorter due to smaller battery capacity.
Both use SD/SDHC cards, but only Casio supports SDXC.
Connectivity: Modern Features or Classic Simplicity
Neither camera provides Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC - modern conveniences for quick sharing or tethered shooting. Both have USB 2.0 and HDMI ports for wired data transfer or external display.
If wireless connectivity is a deal-breaker for you, neither fits today’s demands.
Price-to-Performance: Which Camera Offers More Bang for the Buck?
At $299.99, the Casio EX-ZR100 offers an affordable, compact superzoom for casual use, street and travel photography, and high-speed bursts.
The Samsung NX5, priced around $499, demands a higher investment but brings superior image quality, manual controls, and an expandable lens ecosystem - excellent for enthusiasts stepping up from consumer compacts.
You pay extra for versatility and long-term growth with the NX5, while the EX-ZR100 is plug-and-play simplicity in a small package.
Real-World Image Comparisons
Seeing is believing. Here are sample images shot under various conditions with both cameras:
Notice how the Samsung NX5’s shots exhibit finer detail, more natural color rendition, and cleaner shadows. The Casio captures vivid images but tends to lose subtle textures and has more noise in low light crops.
Summarizing Performance Scores
Here’s a quick visual summary of their overall capabilities:
The NX5 scores particularly well in image quality and versatility, while the EX-ZR100 shines in portability and burst speed.
Genre-Specific Strengths and Weaknesses
A deeper dive by photographic style shows this split clearly:
- Portraits and landscape imaging: NX5 dominates
- Action and burst shooting: EX-ZR100 leads
- Video: Casio has a slight edge
- Macro and travel: NX5 favored due to lenses and battery
Who Should Buy the Casio EX-ZR100?
If your photography is spontaneous street shots, travel snapshots, and you prioritize:
- A compact, pocketable design
- High-speed continuous shooting for fleeting moments
- Decent stabilization in a zoom lens
- Simple, point-and-shoot ease without the fuss of lenses or menus
Then the Casio EX-ZR100 offers a solid, budget-friendly option that’s fun and lightweight.
Who Should Choose the Samsung NX5?
Conversely, if you want to:
- Step into interchangeable lens photography
- Capture portraits with creamy bokeh and accurate autofocus
- Shoot landscapes and night scenes with good dynamic range
- Build a future-proof camera system with diverse lenses
- Use manual controls and raw files for professional workflows
The Samsung NX5 is superior despite its older design and lack of latest wireless features. For enthusiasts wanting growth and image quality, it remains very compelling.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
Comparing these two cameras highlights an important truth in photography gear: your choice must align with your shooting style and ambitions.
The Casio EX-ZR100 stands strong as a compact superzoom with surprising burst speed and stabilization, ideal for casual shooters valuing portability and versatility in a fixed lens. But its small sensor and dated autofocus mean image quality and creative control will stay limited.
The Samsung NX5, while older and bulkier, delivers far superior image quality and creative flexibility thanks to a larger APS-C sensor and a growing lens lineup. Its ergonomics, EVF, and manual controls invite more serious photographers to experiment and improve.
Personally, I lean toward the NX5 for anyone serious about building photographic skills and image quality; the EX-ZR100 is an excellent companion camera or pick for travel when minimalism is key.
Whether you choose the nimble Casio or the versatile Samsung, both cameras are nostalgic reminders of exciting photographic eras. You’ll find much joy capturing moments with either, provided your expectations align with their technical frameworks.
Happy shooting!
If you want to see side-by-side technical breakdowns or sample galleries, check out the images above. My testing methodology incorporated extended handheld shooting sessions, low-light comparisons, autofocus speed trials, and genre-specific scenarios to mirror real-world use.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung NX5 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung NX5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung NX5 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2010-06-01 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | DRIM Engine |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 15MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 15 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Available lenses | - | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 40.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 11.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 204 grams (0.45 pounds) | 499 grams (1.10 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 87 x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 400 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | BP1130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $300 | $499 |