Casio EX-ZR100 vs Sigma SD14
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39


59 Imaging
42 Features
30 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Sigma SD14 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 750g - 144 x 107 x 81mm
- Introduced September 2006
- Old Model is Sigma SD10
- Later Model is Sigma SD15

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Sigma SD14: An Expert Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts
Choosing your next camera can be daunting, especially when options are vastly different in design, technology, and target use. Today, we dive deep into two seemingly disparate models: the Casio EX-ZR100, a compact small-sensor superzoom introduced in 2011, and the Sigma SD14, an advanced DSLR with a unique sensor technology launched in 2006. With over 15 years of hands-on testing under our belts, we’ll break down how these cameras perform across multiple photography disciplines, technical specifications, and real-world scenarios. Whether you’re a beginner looking for ease of use or a pro demanding image quality and workflow flexibility, this comparison will illuminate which model suits your creative journey best.
Getting to Know the Contenders: Design and Ergonomics
Before diving into technicalities, it helps to get a feel for the cameras' physical presence and handling.
- Casio EX-ZR100: Compact, light, and travel-friendly.
- Sigma SD14: Larger, mid-size DSLR rangefinder-style body prioritizing grip and control.
Key observations:
- The EX-ZR100 measures 105×59×29 mm, weighing just 204g. Its compact form encourages grab-and-go photography, ideal for street, travel, and casual shooting.
- The SD14 is significantly bulkier at 144×107×81 mm and 750g, better suited for users comfortable with traditional DSLR ergonomics. The robust grip and larger body provide stability, especially with telephoto lenses.
Control Layout and Interface
Let’s peek in from above to understand control placement:
- The Casio EX-ZR100 uses a minimalist approach: limited buttons, a mode dial, but no electronic viewfinder (EVF). Its controls are straightforward, appealing to newcomers but limiting for fast manual adjustments.
- The Sigma SD14 embraces DSLR conventions: dedicated dials for shutter speed, ISO, aperture, and a top LCD panel showing key info. While less polished than modern DSLRs, it grants tactile access to settings, suiting enthusiasts who demand manual control.
The Heart of the Camera: Sensor and Image Quality
This is where the two diverge drastically, affecting nearly every photographic outcome.
Specification | Casio EX-ZR100 | Sigma SD14 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | BSI-CMOS, 1/2.3" | CMOS Foveon X3, APS-C (20.7×13.8 mm) |
Sensor Area | ~28.07 mm² | ~285.66 mm² |
Resolution | 12 MP (4000×3000 px) | 5 MP (2640×1760 px native) |
Max ISO | 3200 | 800 native (1600 boosted) |
Anti-alias filter | Yes | Yes |
Raw Support | No | Yes |
What Does This Mean in Practice?
- Casio’s small 1/2.3" sensor, common in compact superzooms, limits low-light performance and dynamic range. The BSI (backside illumination) helps sensitivity but can’t match larger sensors. The relatively high megapixels on this size may introduce noise and reduced per-pixel quality.
- Sigma’s Foveon X3 sensor is unique: it captures full color information at each pixel site via three stacked layers. Though the native resolution reads 5 MP, color detail rivals higher-megapixel Bayer sensors. The APS-C size vastly improves light gathering and dynamic range, favored by portrait and landscape users who prize image fidelity.
Bottom line: If ultimate image quality and RAW flexibility are your priorities, Sigma shines - especially in controlled lighting. If convenience and zoom reach are your focus, Casio’s small-sensor approach provides versatility.
Viewing and Composition Aids
Next up, how each camera helps you frame your shot.
- Casio EX-ZR100 features a 3-inch fixed LCD with 461k dots, rendered in Super Clear TFT technology. This gives bright, vibrant image playback and framing assistance. However, no EVF exists, which can challenge bright light shooting.
- Sigma SD14 has a smaller (2.5-inch, 150k dots) fixed LCD with lower resolution, reflecting its age and design philosophy. Importantly, it includes an optical pentaprism viewfinder with 98% coverage and 0.6x magnification, allowing precise manual composition.
Impact on Usability:
- The EX-ZR100’s larger screen benefits casual and street photography, simplifying live view shooting and video.
- The SD14’s optical viewfinder enhances shooting ergonomics for traditional DSLR users and reduces lag, critical for action or critical focusing.
Autofocus Systems: How Do They Track Your Subjects?
Fast and accurate autofocus (AF) is crucial in many genres.
Feature | Casio EX-ZR100 | Sigma SD14 |
---|---|---|
AF System | Contrast-detection (live view) | Contrast-detection (live view) |
Focus Points | Unknown, multi-area selectable | Multi-area selectable |
Face Detection | No | No |
Continuous AF | No | Yes |
Tracking AF | Yes (single AF only) | No |
Real-World AF Performance
- The Casio EX-ZR100 uses a contrast-detection system typical of compact cameras. It lacks phase detection, resulting in slower, less reliable focus especially in low light or fast action. However, it does boast a rapid burst mode (40 fps!), useful for fleeting moments.
- The Sigma SD14’s AF system is also contrast-based APS-C, but in DSLR form, it benefits from interchangeable lenses with built-in focus motors. Continuous AF (for moving subjects) is available but not sophisticated by today’s standards.
In practice:
- For wildlife and sports, these older AF systems show limitations. Neither excels in tracking fast-moving subjects reliably.
- For portrait and landscape work, manual focus opportunities on the SD14, combined with quality lenses, offer finer control.
Lens Ecosystem and Versatility
Lens options are vital when considering long-term camera use.
Casio EX-ZR100
- Fixed lens: 24-300mm equivalent (12.5× zoom), aperture f/3.0-5.9
- Sensor crop factor ~5.8x, unique to small sensor compacts
- No interchangeable lenses, so versatility is limited to zoom range and macro available
Sigma SD14
- Sigma SA lens mount with 76 lenses available (prime, zoom, macro, telephoto)
- APS-C crop factor of 1.7x means careful focal length choices needed compared to full frame
- Compatible lenses cover virtually every photographic genre
This makes the SD14 an adaptable platform capable of growing with your skills and interests, while the EX-ZR100 offers an all-in-one package suitable for travel and casual shooting.
Shooting Across Genres: How Do They Stack Up?
Our experience with thousands of cameras informs these genre-by-genre insights:
Portrait Photography
- Sigma SD14: With its large sensor and unique Foveon chip, skin tones render exquisitely smooth and natural. RAW files allow extensive post-processing, and interchangeable lenses enable superb bokeh with fast primes.
- Casio EX-ZR100: Offers face detection AF limitations (none, actually), and the 1/2.3" sensor struggles with shallow depth of field. Skin tones can look plasticky under harsh lighting.
Winner: Sigma SD14
Landscape Photography
- SD14’s dynamic range and resolution, though modest at 5 MP, allow richly detailed captures. Its robust construction is stable enough but lacks weather sealing.
- EX-ZR100’s sensor struggles with shadows and highlights. The extensive zoom may aid framing distant landscapes, but image quality is second-tier.
Winner: Sigma SD14
Wildlife Photography
- The EX-ZR100’s 300mm zoom (effective ~1700mm due to crop factor) is impressive for a compact, though image quality drops at full zoom. Burst speed is 40 fps, great for fast action but limited by AF sluggishness.
- The SD14 requires telephoto lenses, increasing bulk and cost. The AF is slow for wildlife’s rapid movements.
Winner: Casio EX-ZR100 for casual wildlife shooting; Sigma better for controlled scenarios with tripod.
Sports Photography
- High frame rates and careful tracking required. Neither camera is optimized here.
- Burst: EX-ZR100’s 40 fps beats SD14’s 3 fps, but AF performance hampers reliability.
- Lack of EVF in Casio and slower AF in Sigma make fast action challenging.
No clear winner; both less ideal for professional sports photography.
Street Photography
- EX-ZR100 wins for portability and quiet operation due to compact size.
- SD14’s bulk and slower operation can be intrusive.
- No EVF in Casio makes viewfinder shooting impossible; SD14’s pentaprism is better for discreet candid shooting.
Winner: Casio EX-ZR100 for walk-around ease; SD14 for deliberate street photography setups.
Macro Photography
- Neither camera excels here. EX-ZR100 has no special macro focus range; Sigma depends on lenses.
- Sigma lens ecosystem offers macro primes for true macro work.
Winner: Sigma SD14 with appropriate lens.
Night/Astro Photography
- Sigma SD14’s low ISO ceiling and tripod use restrict long exposure flexibility but RAW files shine in post.
- Casio EX-ZR100 max shutter speed 15s is standard; sensor noise at high ISO reduces image quality.
Neither offers specialized astro features.
Winner: Tie, with preference to Sigma for post-processing capabilities.
Video Capabilities
- EX-ZR100 records full HD at 30fps, supports H.264 video codec. No mic or headphone jacks.
- SD14 lacks video altogether.
Winner: Casio EX-ZR100
Travel Photography
- Weight and size favor EX-ZR100 for travelers prioritizing convenience and lens reach.
- Sigma’s bulk weighs down portability but offers image quality for serious photo trips.
Winner: Casio EX-ZR100 for casual travelers; Sigma SD14 for image quality-focused vacation photography.
Professional Use
- SD14 supports RAW files, vital for professional workflow. Lens interchangeability and manual controls also benefit pros.
- Casio’s lack of RAW and fixed lens limit professional prospects.
Winner: Sigma SD14
Build Quality and Durability
Neither camera boasts weather sealing or rugged features. The Sigma SD14’s DSLR shell is sturdier with metal components, while Casio’s plastic compact body suits casual use.
Battery Life and Storage Media
- Sigma SD14 stores images on CompactFlash cards, common in DSLRs of its era but less convenient today. Power and battery specs unspecified but should be comparable for moderate shooting.
- Casio EX-ZR100 uses SD cards, still industry standard, with no battery info provided but lightweight favors quick charging.
Connectivity and Modern Features
Both cameras lack wireless (WiFi, Bluetooth) and GPS capabilities, reflecting their production ages. Casio does provide HDMI output, useful for viewing photos on larger screens.
Summing Up the Technical Scores
- Image quality heavily favors Sigma’s Foveon sensor despite lower resolution figures.
- Convenience and zoom capability tilt toward Casio’s compact design.
- Autofocus and shooting speed remain modest on both, limiting action photography.
Performance Analysis Across Photography Types
The graphics reinforce:
- Best for portrait, landscape, and studio: Sigma SD14
- Best for travel, casual, and street: Casio EX-ZR100
- Both are challenged in sports and wildlife, but Casio offers more reach and faster burst.
Who Should Choose Which?
Opt for the Casio EX-ZR100 if you:
- Want a highly portable, user-friendly camera with a broad zoom for varied scenes.
- Appreciate smooth video capture and on-the-go shooting without fuss.
- Prioritize convenience over RAW and ultimate image fidelity.
- Are on a budget (~$300 used price range).
- Shoot casual portraits, street scenes, or travel snapshots.
Lean toward the Sigma SD14 if you:
- Demand excellent image quality and color fidelity from a unique sensor.
- Shoot portraits, landscapes, and controlled studio work.
- Value RAW processing and interchangeable optics.
- Are comfortable with manual focus and DSLR handling.
- Have access to Sigma SA lenses or are willing to invest.
- Seek a camera platform for creative growth and professional workflows.
Final Thoughts: Tailoring Your Choice to Your Vision
Both cameras represent interesting snapshots in digital photography evolution. The Casio EX-ZR100 is a versatile, pocketable superzoom ideal for travel and casual use with modest image quality but good zoom range and video options. The Sigma SD14, with its singular Foveon X3 sensor and DSLR form, caters to photographers prioritizing image fidelity, manual control, and a lens ecosystem capable of tackling serious photography across genres.
Choosing for your needs involves weighing convenience versus image quality, zoom versus lens flexibility, and compactness versus manual controls. For creators starting or seeking a dependable travel camera with video, test the EX-ZR100. For those who want to dive deep into photographic craft with superior image quality and post-processing control, the Sigma SD14 remains a compelling, albeit niche, choice.
Exploring Further: Where to Go From Here
- Try both cameras hands-on if possible; handling reveals practical comfort and interface intuitiveness.
- Explore lenses if considering the Sigma SD14 - investing wisely in primes or zooms maximizes your creative range.
- For Casio users, experiment with manual exposure and explore stabilization to get the most from the fixed lens.
- Expand your skillset with macro adapters or ND filters to extend creative options.
Photography is a journey - your camera is your companion. Whichever path you choose, get started shooting, experimenting, and telling your visual story.
Thank you for joining this expert comparison. For answers to specific questions or gear recommendations, feel free to reach out - we’re here to support your creative ambitions.
Happy shooting!
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Sigma SD14 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Sigma SD14 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Sigma |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Sigma SD14 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2011-07-19 | 2006-09-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 5 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 2640 x 1760 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Total lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 150 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.6x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 40.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 204g (0.45 lb) | 750g (1.65 lb) |
Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 144 x 107 x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $300 | $198 |