Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon A900
90 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Introduced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Released February 2016
- New Model is Nikon A1000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon A900 Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Nikon A900, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Nikon. The image resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the A900 (20MP) is very similar and they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR1000 was released 4 years before the A900 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the EX-ZR1000 matches up against the A900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon A900 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 and Nikon Coolpix A900. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery and Nikon A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Nikon A900
| EX-ZR1000 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
| A900 | EX-ZR1000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 |  | September 2012 | More modern by 41 months |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 461k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Nikon A900
| EX-ZR1000 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Tilting | Tilting display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon A900 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR1000 has got exterior measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) while the Nikon A900 has specifications of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") and a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Nikon A900 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR1000 vs the A900.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and A900 is 90 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon A900 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by going over specifications. The picture below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR1000 and A900.
To sum up, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Nikon A900 to offer extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR1000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Nikon A900 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Nikon Coolpix A900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Nikon |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Nikon Coolpix A900 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2012-09-25 | 2016-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-840mm (35.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.4-6.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 255 gr (0.56 lb) | 289 gr (0.64 lb) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 images | 300 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $572 | $400 |
