Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus VR-320
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
90 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR1000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Announced September 2012
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Later Model is Olympus VR-330
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Here is a complete assessment of the Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty close and they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR1000 was announced 15 months later than the VR-320 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the EX-ZR1000 scores against the VR-320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 & Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Olympus VR-320
| EX-ZR1000 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2012 |  | July 2011 | Fresher by 15 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
| VR-320 | EX-ZR1000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Olympus VR-320
| EX-ZR1000 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR1000 has external measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR1000 compared to the VR-320.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and VR-320 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizing purely by looking through specifications. The graphic below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR1000 and VR-320.
To sum up, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR1000 to render extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR1000 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR1000
Portrait photography with Olympus VR-320
focusing manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
provides face detection focus
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
decent megapixels (14MP)
includes face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Street photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Street photography camera
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (255g)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (158 grams)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Sports photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography highlights
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16MP)
provides tracking autofocus
good battery (470 per charge)
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames per second)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
includes tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Travel photography camera
good battery (470 shots)
lighter than competitors (255 grams)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
great reach (300mm)
missing Timelapse function
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
lighter than competitors in class (158 grams)
decent megapixels (14MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Landscape photography advice
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography advice
focusing manually
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16MP)
good battery (470 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
missing Timelapse function
reasonably wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
no manual exposure
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
lack of Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Vlogging advice
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging advice
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors (255g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
missing external microphone socket
reasonably wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focusing
lighter than competitors in class (158 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic support
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-09-25 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 255 grams (0.56 lb) | 158 grams (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $572 | $179 |
