Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Panasonic FX75
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR1000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012
Panasonic FX75
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FX70
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
In this article, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Panasonic FX75, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is relatively close and they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR1000 was launched 2 years later than the FX75 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the EX-ZR1000 scores vs the FX75 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery & Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Panasonic FX75
| EX-ZR1000 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2012 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 29 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
| FX75 | EX-ZR1000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Panasonic FX75
| EX-ZR1000 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR1000 comes with outside measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX75 has dimensions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Panasonic FX75 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is the front view size comparison of the EX-ZR1000 against the FX75.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR1000 and FX75 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements only by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph here should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR1000 and FX75.
Clearly, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR1000 to render greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR1000 provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Portrait photography highlights
Panasonic FX75 Portrait photography highlights
focusing manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focusing
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Street photography info
Panasonic FX75 Street photography info
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (255 grams)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
has image stabilization (Optical)
features touch to focus
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic FX75 as a Sports photography camera
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
good battery life (470 CIPA)
low fps (3.0 frames/s)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
max frames per second low (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Travel photography information
Panasonic FX75 Travel photography information
good battery life (470 per charge)
lighter than competition in class (255 grams)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
features touch to focus
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
no Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.2)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic FX75 as a Landscape photography camera
focusing manually
relatively wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
good battery life (470 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
lack of Timelapse mode
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.2)
small screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual exposure
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
no Time Lapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 Vlogging details
Panasonic FX75 Vlogging details
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition in class (255g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of external microphone port
rather wide (24mm)
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish max aperture (f2.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external mic port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Panasonic |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
| Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-09-25 | 2010-06-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 7.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 255 gr (0.56 pounds) | 165 gr (0.36 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $572 | $139 |