Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh G900
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Released February 2018
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh G900 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh G900, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the G900 (20MP) is relatively close and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR1000 was introduced 6 years earlier than the G900 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-ZR1000 grades against the G900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 and Ricoh G900. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery and Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Ricoh G900
| EX-ZR1000 | G900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
| G900 | EX-ZR1000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2018 |  | September 2012 | Newer by 65 months |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 461k | Sharper screen (+579k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Ricoh G900
| EX-ZR1000 | G900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR1000 comes with physical measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Ricoh G900 has specifications of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh G900 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR1000 against the G900.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and G900 is 90 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions merely by viewing technical specs. The image underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR1000 and G900.
As you can tell, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should count on the Ricoh G900 to provide you with greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR1000 will be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Ricoh G900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Ricoh G900 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-09-25 | 2018-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461k dots | 1,040k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Flash on, flash off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 3840x2160 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 255g (0.56 lbs) | 247g (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photos | 340 photos |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $572 | $752 |