Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh G900
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44


89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Released February 2018

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs. Ricoh G900: An In-Depth Comparison for Every Photographer’s Journey
Choosing the right camera often feels like navigating a forest of specs and buzzwords. Today, we're honing in on two intriguing compact cameras that cater to very different user needs but share some common ground: the Casio EX-ZR1000 and the Ricoh G900. Both are ruggedly respectable, yet each takes a distinctive path. Whether you’re a casual explorer or a professional who needs reliability in tough conditions, this detailed comparison breaks down what you really need to know.
Getting to Know These Cameras: Brief Overview
Feature | Casio EX-ZR1000 | Ricoh G900 |
---|---|---|
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof Compact |
Announced | September 2012 | February 2018 |
Sensor Size | 1/2.3" CMOS (16 MP) | 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS (20 MP) |
Lens Focal Range | 24-300 mm (12.5x zoom, F3.0-5.9) | 28-140 mm (5x zoom, F3.5-5.5) |
Screen | 3" Tilting, 461k dots | 3" Fixed, 1040k dots |
Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift | Digital |
Max ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
RAW Support | No | No |
Video Capability | Full HD (1920x1080, 30fps) | 4K UHD (3840x2160) |
Weather Sealing | No | Yes (Waterproof, Dustproof, Shockproof) |
Weight | 255 g | 247 g |
Price (as announced) | Approx. $570 | Approx. $750 |
Both cameras are compact, light, and easy to handle. However, the Casio EX-ZR1000 emphasizes a superzoom capability with a versatile fixed lens, while the Ricoh G900 clearly targets photographers needing ultimate toughness alongside mid-range zoom. Now let's dive deeper into what sets them apart.
Physical size and ergonomic nuances between EX-ZR1000 and G900.
Design, Handling, and Build Quality: Form Meets Function for Your Photography Needs
Ergonomics and Controls: Which One Feels Right in Your Hands?
-
Casio EX-ZR1000: Designed with a user-friendly compact body (108x62x37mm) and weighing 255 grams, it feels nimble without sacrificing a comfortable grip. The tilting 3" screen with its "Super Clear TFT" technology, while modest at 461k resolution, gives you basic flexibility for composing shots at different angles. The camera sports a good mix of manual controls including shutter and aperture priority, manual exposure, and exposure compensation – an enthusiast’s handy toolkit.
-
Ricoh G900: Slightly larger (118x66x33mm) and lighter at 247 grams, the G900 emphasizes ruggedness with a water-, dust-, shock-, crush-, and freeze-proof body. The fixed 3" screen offers higher resolution (1040k dots), providing sharper detail in live view and playback, but lacks tilt functionality. Its controls lean more towards simplicity - no shutter/aperture priority or manual exposure modes, targeting users prioritizing quick, reliable shooting over complex settings.
-
Both cameras lack an electronic viewfinder (EVF), relying solely on their LCDs, a typical choice for compacts but worth noting if you shoot in bright light.
Top-down view highlighting the differences in control layout and button placement.
Our Take: If you want comfortable manual control in a small, lightweight package, the EX-ZR1000 feels more “camera-like” in handling. Choose the G900 if you need rugged durability for demanding environments, even if it means sacrificing some customizable control.
Sensor Technology & Image Quality: Digging Beneath the Megapixels
Both cameras use 1/2.3" sensors, a common size in this category, but with different sensor types and resolutions:
-
Casio EX-ZR1000:
- 16MP CMOS sensor with a standard Bayer filter and anti-aliasing filter.
- ISO range from 80 to 3200.
- Limited dynamic range typical of small sensors.
- No RAW shooting support, resulting in less flexibility for post-processing.
- 28.07 mm² sensor area.
-
Ricoh G900:
- 20MP BSI-CMOS sensor with anti-aliasing filter; BSI (Back-Side Illuminated) technology enhances low-light sensitivity.
- ISO range from 125 to 6400, practically doubling selectivity in dim conditions.
- No RAW support either, which limits advanced editing.
- Sensor area is identical in size (28.07 mm²), but the higher resolution maxes at 5184x3888 pixels.
Despite their sensor size being the same, the G900's BSI technology and higher megapixels potentially deliver cleaner images at higher ISO, essential for low-light or detail-critical capture.
Sensor size metrics illustrating the identical sensor dimensions but different sensor technologies.
Image Quality in Practice:
- The EX-ZR1000’s images exhibit pleasing colors with reliable exposure, but shadow detail and noise control fall off at ISO 800 and beyond. The anti-aliasing filter smooths textures but may slightly soften fine detail.
- The G900 provides sharper detail at native resolution. Its better ISO performance is an advantage in night, indoor, and challenging lighting with less noise and more confident shadow recovery.
However, neither camera competes with larger-sensor systems, so expectations should be carefully managed.
Lens and Zoom: Flexibility for Framing Your World
Parameter | Casio EX-ZR1000 | Ricoh G900 |
---|---|---|
Focal Range (35mm eq) | 24-300 mm (12.5x zoom) | 28-140 mm (5x zoom) |
Maximum Aperture | F3.0 (wide) - F5.9 (tele) | F3.5 (wide) - F5.5 (tele) |
Macro Focus Range | 5 cm | 1 cm |
Optical Image Stabil. | Sensor-shift | Digital |
-
Casio EX-ZR1000: The standout feature here is the 12.5x superzoom range starting from a wide 24mm equivalent, perfect for landscapes and close-ups alike. Sensor-shift stabilization counteracts shaking for crisper telephoto shots. Good for travel and wildlife enthusiasts who want reach without bulk.
-
Ricoh G900: The 5x optical zoom maxes at 140mm equivalent, a more moderate range but well-balanced for everyday and professional inspections. Remarkably, the macro focus limit reaches just 1 cm, giving you serious close-up ability for macro shooters or precise close inspection tasks.
Real-World Use: The Casio's deeper zoom is a clear advantage if telephoto reach is your priority. The Ricoh’s superior macro capability shines for extreme closeup scenarios and fieldwork where weather sealing is crucial.
Autofocus and Performance: Speed, Accuracy, and Shooting Experience
Feature | Casio EX-ZR1000 | Ricoh G900 |
---|---|---|
Autofocus Type | Contrast Detection, Center Weighted AF | Contrast Detection, 9 Points, Center AF |
Face Detection | Yes | Yes |
Eye Detection | No | No |
Continuous AF | No | Yes |
Continuous Shooting | 3 fps | Not specified (likely slower) |
-
Casio EX-ZR1000: Offers face detection but no eye AF or continuous autofocus, which limits tracking moving subjects in action or wildlife photography.
-
Ricoh G900: Includes continuous AF with 9-point focus areas, better for tracking moving subjects, important if your work involves dynamic scenes or field inspections. It also includes face detection for simplified portrait work.
Shooting Speed: The EX-ZR1000’s 3 fps continuous shooting is modest but manageable for casual bursts. The G900’s continuous shooting rate is not detailed explicitly in specs but will likely be similar or slower, prioritizing stability and reliability.
Display and User Interface: Interaction Matters
-
EX-ZR1000: Features a tilting 3” LCD with a resolution of 461k dots. Its tilting screen is very helpful for low- or high-angle shots, increasing versatility for vlogging or creative framing.
-
G900: Has a fixed 3” LCD screen at 1040k dots resolution, which is notably sharper but lacks tilt/flip. It’s highly visible, especially important in harsh outdoor conditions or wet environments.
Neither includes a touchscreen, which some might miss for quick focus or menu navigation - especially in fast-paced scenarios.
Rear screen resolution and tilt comparison for more intuitive framing.
Video Capabilities: From Casual Clips to Professional Footage
Aspect | Casio EX-ZR1000 | Ricoh G900 |
---|---|---|
Max Resolution | Full HD 1920x1080 @ 30fps | 4K UHD 3840x2160 |
Slow Motion | Up to 1000 fps (at low resolution) | No |
Video Formats | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone Input | No | No |
Image Stabilization | Yes (sensor-shift) | Digital |
-
Casio EX-ZR1000 supports slow-motion at frame rates up to 1000 fps, which opens creative possibilities for experimental video, though only at reduced resolutions. Its Full HD 1080p is the ceiling for standard video, fitting casual vloggers.
-
Ricoh G900 impresses with 4K UHD video capture at 30fps, delivering sharp footage for professional applications or content creators who value image quality. Lack of microphone input somewhat limits audio control.
Both cameras lack advanced video features like log profiles or external mic jacks, so for intensive filmmaking, other models excel.
Durability and Environmental Suitability: How and Where Can You Shoot?
Feature | Casio EX-ZR1000 | Ricoh G900 |
---|---|---|
Waterproof | No | Yes (up to 15m) |
Dustproof | No | Yes |
Shockproof | No | Yes (up to 2m drop) |
Freezeproof | No | Yes (-10°C) |
Crushproof | No | Yes (up to 100 kgf force) |
-
Casio EX-ZR1000: A standard compact without rugged protection. Best for controlled environments - studio, indoor, or dry conditions.
-
Ricoh G900: A true champion in durability. Engineered for field work, harsh outdoor adventures, or industrial inspection where rain, dust, bumps, and temperature extremes happen.
If your adventures include waterfalls, dusty trails, or construction sites, the G900’s environmental sealing is invaluable.
Connectivity, Battery Life, and Storage: Keeping You Powered and Connected
Aspect | Casio EX-ZR1000 | Ricoh G900 |
---|---|---|
Wireless | None | FlashAir SD card support (wireless SD) |
HDMI | Yes | Yes |
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbps) | USB Charger (via DB-110 battery) |
GPS | No | Yes (built-in) |
Battery Life | Approx. 470 shots | Approx. 340 shots |
Storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (1 slot) | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC (1 slot) |
- The Casio offers no wireless features, which might be a drawback if rapid photo transfer is important.
- The Ricoh supports Toshiba FlashAir wireless SD cards, enabling some wireless connectivity without integrated Wi-Fi.
- GPS built into the G900 adds value for photographers or professionals who want geotagging - crucial for field documentation.
- Battery life favors Casio significantly, likely due to fewer protections and simpler electronics.
Real-World Photography Use Case Insights
Here’s a practical look at how these cameras perform in the photography disciplines you care about.
Portrait Photography
- EX-ZR1000: Good face detection but no eye AF, manual exposure and aperture priority enable control over depth of field. Wide zoom allows flattering wide-angle and moderate portrait telephoto.
- Ricoh G900: Face detection included but limited exposure control; higher resolution and sharpness yield good detail but slightly shorter zoom and fixed aperture range.
Verdict: Casio better for controlled portrait work; Ricoh for rugged outdoor portraits where weather is a concern.
Landscape Photography
- EX-ZR1000: Superzoom reaches 24mm ultra-wide, good for sweeping vistas; sensor size limits dynamic range.
- Ricoh G900: Zoom capped at 28mm on wide side, higher resolution, and ruggedness ideal for harsh environments.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
- EX-ZR1000: 12.5x zoom is handy for distant wildlife; however, low continuous shooting speed (3 fps) and no continuous AF hamper action tracking.
- Ricoh G900: Shorter zoom but continuous AF aids tracking; ruggedness great for fieldwork.
Street Photography
- Both compact and pocketable, but the EX-ZR1000’s tilting screen might assist candid shooting. The G900’s ruggedness can be overkill unless you’re in extreme climates.
Macro Photography
- EX-ZR1000: 5 cm closest focusing; decent for casual macro.
- G900: Impressive 1 cm macro focusing for close details - ideal for nature or inspection.
Night / Astro Photography
- Both restricted by small sensors and limited ISO flexibility.
- G900’s higher max ISO supports better low-light capture.
- Neither supports long exposures or RAW.
Video Creation
- EX-ZR1000: Full HD video plus creative slow-motion.
- G900: Sharp 4K video; no external mics or stabilization beyond digital.
Travel Photography
- Weight and size comparable.
- Casio offers longer battery life and broader zoom.
- G900 is rugged for all weather, ideal for adventurous trips.
Professional Applications
- Casio lacks weather sealing; limited continuous AF.
- G900 excels in durability, GPS tagging, useful in inspections, industrial and extreme environments.
Sample images from both cameras demonstrating zoom, macro, and color rendering differences.
Summarizing Strengths and Weaknesses
Camera | Strengths | Weaknesses |
---|---|---|
Casio EX-ZR1000 | - Long 12.5x zoom range - Manual controls - Tilting screen - Excellent battery life |
- No weather sealing - No RAW support - Modest video resolution - Lower-res screen |
Ricoh G900 | - Rugged, waterproof, dustproof body - 4K UHD video - Better sensor resolution and ISO - Superior macro focus - GPS tagging |
- Shorter zoom range - Fixed screen - No manual exposure modes - Lower battery life |
Overall performance ratings based on combined testing metrics.
Which Camera Should You Choose? Tailored Recommendations
-
If You Prioritize Variety and Manual Control:
The Casio EX-ZR1000 offers flexibility in zoom, exposure control, and a tilting screen at a competitive price point. It suits casual zoom-lovers, hobbyists in controlled settings, and vloggers exploring creative shooting angles. Long battery life supports travel and extended outings. -
If You Need Ruggedness and Reliability in Harsh Conditions:
The Ricoh G900 is your go-to. It’s crafted for professionals working in demanding environments: industrial, inspection, adventure photography, and outdoor enthusiasts. Its 4K video and macro prowess broaden creative and practical use. Accept its simpler controls and shorter zoom in exchange for durability and GPS. -
Budget Considerations:
The EX-ZR1000 is generally less expensive, making it accessible for those experimenting or needing a versatile superzoom. The G900 demands a premium for weather sealing and 4K video, justifiable in rough use cases.
Genre-specific performance analysis – Casio EX-ZR1000 excels at travel and zoom-based shooting; Ricoh G900 dominates rugged fieldwork and macro.
Final Thoughts: Your Creative Journey with These Cameras
Both the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Ricoh G900 fill specific niches rather than competing head-to-head. If your photography leans toward exploration of focal length variety, creative exposure settings, and dynamic shooting angles, the EX-ZR1000 is a strong candidate. Meanwhile, if your photography involves challenging environments where reliability and durability are paramount, the Ricoh G900 provides peace of mind and practical features like GPS and 4K video.
Our testing experience underscores how understanding your typical shooting conditions and photographic priorities will save you from frustrating trade-offs. We encourage you to handle both cameras if possible, test their autofocus response, and consider how their features align with your vision.
For aspiring creators or seasoned pros, pairing these cameras with compatible lenses (where possible) and accessories enhances your photography. Check out dedicated superzoom cases for Casio and rugged camera bags for Ricoh to get started.
Explore Further...
Feel free to take these cameras for a spin at your local dealer or rent them to experience their unique features firsthand. The right camera is not only about specs but about how it inspires you to see the world differently - and capture those moments perfectly.
Happy shooting!
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Ricoh G900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Ricoh G900 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Released | 2012-09-25 | 2018-02-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 461k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Flash on, flash off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 3840x2160 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 255g (0.56 lbs) | 247g (0.54 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photos | 340 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $572 | $752 |