Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung TL210
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9aa98/9aa982410c7510bfbc83a3262c181859101131e1" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37590/375904798060e97eb5dfbb02b75093afb956586f" alt="Samsung TL210 front Samsung TL210 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung TL210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Additionally Known as PL150
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung TL210 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Samsung TL210, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and TL210 (12MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The EX-ZR1000 was announced 2 years later than the TL210 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR1000 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL210 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-ZR1000 grades versus the TL210 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung TL210 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 & Samsung TL210. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery & Samsung TL210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Samsung TL210
EX-ZR1000 | TL210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2012 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 34 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL210 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
TL210 | EX-ZR1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Samsung TL210
EX-ZR1000 | TL210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung TL210 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR1000 offers physical dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) while the Samsung TL210 has proportions of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Samsung TL210 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-ZR1000 and the TL210.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93517/9351758f5c7dd2d601b037139097df35405143fa" alt="Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung TL210 size comparison Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung TL210 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and TL210 is 90 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2daca/2dacaded9141520b6c1eae1aedebb6eefd68cd82" alt="Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung TL210 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung TL210 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung TL210 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing just by reading specifications. The photograph here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR1000 and TL210.
Plainly, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR1000 to deliver more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots much more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR1000 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef779/ef77994327ad9216f006a76bd42ab2663dcecce9" alt="Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung TL210 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung TL210 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung TL210 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c2fd/9c2fd44ad03757d50b2fd38c2001b3da7d092be3" alt="Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung TL210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung TL210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung TL210 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung TL210 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung TL210 |
Also referred to as | - | PL150 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Released | 2012-09-25 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 27-135mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Resolution of display | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 255 grams (0.56 lb) | 177 grams (0.39 lb) |
Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | SLB-07B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $572 | $230 |