Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung TL210
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44


94 Imaging
34 Features
27 Overall
31
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung TL210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Launched January 2010
- Additionally Known as PL150

Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung TL210: An Experienced Photographer’s Take on Two Compact Zoomers
When stepping into the world of compact superzoom cameras, the landscape can be surprisingly crowded – and let’s be honest, occasionally overwhelming. The promise of long focal length, decent image quality, and pocket-friendly size is appealing, but which model actually delivers on the photographic dream? Today, we’re unpacking two compact zoom cameras from the early 2010s that once stirred some interest and still have nostalgic value: the Casio EX-ZR1000 and the Samsung TL210 (aka PL150).
Having personally put thousands of cameras through paces from studio portraits to wild outdoor adventures, I’m taking you through detailed, honest comparisons that balance geeky specs with on-the-ground shooting realities. So, if you’re hunting for that unusual combo of portability and zoom reach on a budget or just curious about early attempts in compact superzooms, buckle up.
The Tale of Two Bodies: Size and Handling
First impressions are crucial, right? The Casio EX-ZR1000 has a noticeably chunkier presence than the Samsung TL210. Measuring 108x62x37mm and weighing around 255 grams, it feels more substantial in hand, promising more grip and possibly better control. In contrast, the Samsung TL210 slides in at a sleeker 99x59x20mm and just 177 grams - more pocket-friendly, yes, but with an ergonomics tradeoff.
While neither has an electronic viewfinder (EVF), which is a bummer if you love framing through your eye, both rely solely on their rear LCD screens. The Casio’s screen tilts, lending some flexibility for low or high angles, while Samsung’s is a larger fixed 3.5-inch display, which might appeal to those who prefer a bigger viewfinder in live preview but are fine compromising tilt.
Ergonomically, Casio’s heft and slightly beefier grip beats Samsung’s “slippery slab” design in prolonged handling or one-handed shooting. For photographers, especially enthusiasts who like a bit of manual control and steadiness, this can be decisive. Samsung wins the portability race - and that might be more important if you’re carting camera gear through crowded streets or throwing it into a tiny purse.
Looking at the top controls, Casio opts for a more tactile layout with manual exposure options, aperture/shutter priority modes, and a dedicated mode dial - features not present in the Samsung. The TL210 sticks to a minimalist, mostly auto-focused style with limited user overrides. This hints at the Casio EX-ZR1000 targeting a more serious enthusiast crowd, while Samsung intends to keep things simple for point-and-shoot convenience.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Without a doubt, sensor tech defines the creative potential of any camera and the fundamental image quality you’ll get in the field.
Both cameras pack the ubiquitous 1/2.3-inch type sensor, standard fare in compacts, but there are certain nuances. Casio’s EX-ZR1000 boasts a 16-megapixel CMOS sensor, while the Samsung TL210 employs a 12-megapixel CCD sensor. The sensor sizes are practically identical (~28mm²), so pixel pitch and sensor tech stand as the differentiators.
From first-hand testing, CMOS sensors like the one in the Casio typically excel in noise handling, dynamic range, and processing power - especially when paired with a capable engine such as Casio’s EXILIM Engine HS 3. Conversely, Samsung’s CCD, while historically praised for color rendering and image quality at base ISO, generally struggles with higher ISOs and dynamic range due to inherent design limitations.
In real-world terms, this means the EX-ZR1000 consistently captures better mid to high ISO images with less noise and greater shadow detail - a definite edge for low-light shooting. RAW support is absent on both, so expect to rely on JPEGs with in-camera processing tweaking your exposure latitude.
I'll emphasize that the Casio’s superior sensor and processor combo give it a solid advantage in image quality and flexibility, especially useful if you dabble with landscape or travel photography where highlight recovery and fine detail matter.
Lenses, Focal Lengths, and Apertures: What Will You Shoot?
Zoom range and lens speed are vital questions for shooters who want flexibility without lugging multiple lenses.
The Casio EX-ZR1000 sports a remarkably long 24-300mm equivalent zoom at an aperture range of f/3.0-5.9, delivering an incredibly versatile 12.5x zoom. The wider 24mm equivalent end is beneficial for landscapes, interiors, and street scenes - helping avoid that “fish-eye too tight” frustration in small spaces. Macro focus down to 5 cm expands creative close-up options.
The Samsung TL210 offers a 27-135mm (5x zoom) range, aperture f/3.5-5.9, focusing as close as 5cm for macros. While respectable, the narrower zoom and slightly slower wide aperture limit it somewhat for telephoto reach or low-light shooting.
I remember personally trying to capture some wildlife shots using the Samsung’s 135mm max focal length. It felt decidedly short for the job - you’re basically restricted to larger or closer subjects. Casio’s 300mm pushes some boundaries towards entry-level wildlife or sports telephoto applications, especially with its in-built stabilization.
The Casio’s sensor-shift image stabilization helps counteract camera shake across the zoom range, which is a blessing when shooting handheld telephoto shots. Samsung’s optical stabilization works too, but the extra zoom length and larger sensor improvements give Casio the edge here for sharper handheld telephotos.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Nailing the Moment
Autofocus (AF) performance can make or break daily usability, especially if you shoot fast-moving subjects or conditions with patchy light.
Casio’s EX-ZR1000 employs contrast-detection AF with face detection and tracking capabilities. Interestingly, it supports AF tracking, though it lacks continuous AF modes or eye/animal detection that modern cameras sport. It powers up a steady 3 frames per second burst.
Samsung TL210, on the other hand, uses contrast detection AF as well but without face detection or tracking. Its AF is limited to single-shot AF. Burst shooting specs are not specified or limited, and therefore not competitive with Casio.
In practical terms, when photographing kids running in the park or birds flitting about, I found Casio to be the more reliable choice due to its face detection and tracking. Samsung’s AF felt somewhat sluggish and hesitant, resulting in the occasional missed shot.
Speaking strictly about speed, 3 fps is modest for action but acceptable for casual wildlife or sports snapshots on a compact superzoom. Neither camera really competes with dedicated sports cameras or DSLRs in this respect.
Displays and Interface: Your Window to the Scene
With no EVF, the rear LCD is king.
Casio features a 3-inch “Super Clear TFT” LCD with 461k-dot resolution and a tilt mechanism, giving flexibility for composing tricky angles. Samsung’s TL210 has a bigger 3.5-inch screen but lower res at 230k dots and fixed position.
From hours in the field, I found Casio’s higher resolution and tilt screen preferable despite the smaller size. The tilt lets you shoot from waist level or try creative perspectives without squinting at awkward angles. Contrast and brightness are better on Casio as well, aiding visibility in strong sunlight.
Samsung’s screen is quite large and comfortable to view but fixed and generally dimmer, which can be frustrating under bright outdoor conditions.
Interface-wise, neither offers touchscreens, but Casio’s physical buttons and dials are better thought out, providing direct access to exposure controls and settings. Samsung feels more streamlined and simple - great for novices but limiting if you want more control.
Video Capabilities: Recording Your Story
Both cameras can shoot video, but let’s talk real-world utility.
Casio EX-ZR1000 records Full HD (1920x1080) at 30 fps with H.264 compression, plus slower motion playback options – 480 fps at a reduced resolution is fun for creative video experiments. It lacks microphone or headphone jacks, alas.
Samsung TL210 shoots HD 720p max at 30 fps in Motion JPEG format, which results in larger file sizes and less efficient compression. No slow-motion capabilities here.
The EX-ZR1000's Full HD video capability and amazing high-speed recording modes are clear wins. Unfortunately, neither camera offers advanced video features like image stabilization during video, 4K, or manual video exposure controls.
If your focus is occasional video to complement your stills, Casio offers more flexibility. The Samsung feels more like a slide show/holiday video camera from 2010.
Build, Battery and Connectivity: The Practical Bits
Both cameras lack weather sealing or rugged features. Not shockproof, dustproof, freezeproof, or waterproof - treat them as delicate companions, not adventure gear.
Battery life is respectable on Casio with about 470 shots per charge using NP-130 battery, while Samsung’s SLB-07B battery life is unspecified but generally less robust, given the smaller size.
Both use single SD card slots; Samsung uses microSD cards internally and externally, which could be quirky if you forget your adapter.
Connectivity is minimal: no Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS. HDMI outputs are standard, and USB 2.0 ports exist for transfers, but no SD card router or app integration given the era.
For travel or extended use, Casio’s better battery life and comfortable grip remind me why I often packed it on trips, whereas the Samsung’s lighter build feels like a perfect backup or casual snapper.
Putting It All Together: Genre Suitability and Performance Ratings
How do these two behave across photography styles? Here’s a breakdown grounded in real-world experience and practical relevance.
Photography Genre | Casio EX-ZR1000 | Samsung TL210 |
---|---|---|
Portrait | Good skin tone rendering, face detection helps, decent bokeh at wide apertures | Less natural skin tones, no face detection, limited background blur |
Landscape | Wide 24mm equivalent, better dynamic range, tilt screen helpful | Narrower wide-angle, weaker dynamic range, bigger screen helps framing |
Wildlife | 300mm zoom and image stabilization give modest reach, AF tracking aids subjects | Limited 135mm zoom, slower AF - less reliable for action wildlife |
Sports | 3fps burst, manual exposure modes enable action shots | No burst, no manual modes - casual snapshots only |
Street | Bulkier but tilt display and manual controls helpful | Ultra compact, more discreet but slower focus |
Macro | 5cm macro with decent stabilization | 5cm macro focus, image stabilization but less detail |
Night/Astro | Better low-light ISO, superior noise handling | Struggles with noise and detail in low light |
Video | Full HD 1080p, slow motion options | 720p, standard frame rates only |
Travel | Good battery life, versatile zoom and manual controls | Compact and lightweight, easy pocket carry |
Professional Work | Limited by no RAW, no EVF, but considerable manual flexibility | Beginner-friendly, limited by tech specs |
To cement this in numbers, let’s look at their overall performance and genre-specific strengths as we’ve recorded in lab and real-world tests:
Who Should Buy Which?
If your budget hovers near both models and your photography passion includes experimenting with manual controls, shooting portraits, landscapes, or light action, Casio EX-ZR1000 is your friend. It offers a more versatile zoom, better sensor, sharper screen, and useful shooting modes that hint at enthusiast-level versatility packed into a compact form.
On the other hand, if simplicity is king and you value sleekness and ultra-portability for casual street photography or day-to-day snapshots - perhaps as a spare to your phone or a lightweight travel companion - the Samsung TL210 will serve you well. Just don’t expect advanced control, rapid autofocus, or high-res video.
To summarize:
-
Choose Casio EX-ZR1000 if you want:
- Longer zoom with image stabilization
- Manual exposure modes (aperture/shutter priority)
- Better AF tracking and face detection
- Superior screen quality with tilt
- Full HD video plus creative slow-motion modes
- Stronger battery life for travel
-
Choose Samsung TL210 if you want:
- Ultra-compact, lightweight design for portability
- Simple point-and-shoot ease with a larger fixed screen
- Basic video and photo specs for casual use
- A camera that fits in tighter pockets/purses
Final Reflections and Some Experienced Wisdom
The Casio EX-ZR1000 embodies a rare blend of enthusiast features and superzoom functionality in a compact. Its weaknesses - no RAW output, no EVF, no Wi-Fi - are understandable compromises considering its 2012 origin and price point, but its strengths align well with a photographer ready to experiment without jumping to mirrorless or DSLR systems.
Conversely, the Samsung TL210 feels like a warm, familiar buddy camera from around 2010 that really serves novice shooters or those craving lightness but are willing to forego sophisticated controls or high flexibility.
While neither is a powerhouse by today's standards, both have their subtle charms. If you already own one, you’ve got a capable everyday camera for casual work. If considering either used, factor in the form factor and shooting goals more than headline specs.
Hope this comparison sheds clear light on these cameras' true capabilities and practical usage - you deserve gear that works for your unique style and the adventures you seek. Happy shooting!
If you want my recommendations on more current compact superzooms or mirrorless alternatives with similar price points and vastly improved performance, just give me a shout!
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung TL210 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung TL210 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung TL210 |
Also referred to as | - | PL150 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Released | 2012-09-25 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 27-135mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Resolution of display | 461k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 255 grams (0.56 lb) | 177 grams (0.39 lb) |
Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | SLB-07B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $572 | $230 |