Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB30F
Portability
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
90 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Portability
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR1000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Announced September 2012
Samsung WB30F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
The following is a extended assessment of the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Samsung WB30F, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the WB30F (16MP) is very comparable and they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-ZR1000 was announced 3 months before the WB30F which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the EX-ZR1000 scores vs the WB30F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 & Samsung WB30F. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery & Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Samsung WB30F
| EX-ZR1000 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Casio EX-ZR1000
| WB30F | EX-ZR1000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Samsung WB30F
| EX-ZR1000 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2012 |  | January 2013 | Same age |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR1000 enjoys outside dimensions of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) while the Samsung WB30F has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Samsung WB30F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR1000 against the WB30F.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR1000 and WB30F is 90 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions simply by checking out specifications. The pic here will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR1000 and WB30F.
To sum up, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of files but you should always factor the launch date of the cameras into account.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-ZR1000
Portrait photography with Samsung WB30F
focusing manually
decent megapixels (16MP)
offers face detection focus
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB30F as a Street photography camera
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (255g)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (128g)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sports photography with Casio EX-ZR1000
Sports photography with Samsung WB30F
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
great battery power (470 per charge)
max fps very slow (3.0 fps)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB30F as a Travel photography camera
great battery power (470 CIPA)
lighter than others (255g)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
lighter than competitors in class (128g)
resolution is good (16MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (24mm)
missing Timelapse recording
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB30F as a Landscape photography camera
focusing manually
really wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
great battery power (470 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Time Lapse mode
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
no manual mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
missing Timelapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB30F as a Vlogging camera
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others (255 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
lack of external mic socket
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection autofocus
lighter than competitors in class (128 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external microphone support
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung WB30F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung WB30F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-09-25 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 255g (0.56 pounds) | 128g (0.28 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $572 | $180 |