Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon P7700
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
82 Imaging
37 Features
70 Overall
50
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon P7700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-4.0) lens
- 392g - 119 x 73 x 50mm
- Announced May 2013
- Succeeded the Nikon P7100
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon P7700 Overview
The following is a complete analysis of the Casio EX-ZR15 and Nikon P7700, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Casio and Nikon. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and P7700 (12MP) and the EX-ZR15 (1/2.3") and P7700 (1/1.7") provide different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-ZR15 was introduced 16 months earlier than the P7700 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-ZR15 matches up against the P7700 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon P7700 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Nikon Coolpix P7700. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Nikon P7700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Nikon P7700
EX-ZR15 | P7700 |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon P7700 over the Casio EX-ZR15
P7700 | EX-ZR15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2013 | January 2012 | Newer by 16 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 461k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Nikon P7700
EX-ZR15 | P7700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon P7700 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR15 features physical dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Nikon P7700 has proportions of 119mm x 73mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.9" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 392 grams (0.86 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR15 and Nikon P7700 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR15 and the P7700.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR15 and P7700 is 93 and 82 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon P7700 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions only by going through specifications. The image underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR15 and P7700.
To sum up, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR15 having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field trickier and the Casio EX-ZR15 will provide greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR15 will be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon P7700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon P7700 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Nikon Coolpix P7700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Nikon |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Nikon Coolpix P7700 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-01-09 | 2013-05-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 99 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.0 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m | 10.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (15, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 176g (0.39 pounds) | 392g (0.86 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 119 x 73 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.9" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 53 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 191 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 shots | 330 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-110 | EN-EL14 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $249 | $499 |