Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-3
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40


90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Renewed by Olympus TG-4

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-3, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the TG-3 (16MP) is relatively comparable and they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR15 was revealed 3 years before the TG-3 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple view of how the EX-ZR15 scores against the TG-3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 and Olympus Tough TG-3. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery and Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Olympus TG-3
EX-ZR15 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Casio EX-ZR15
TG-3 | EX-ZR15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2014 | ![]() | January 2012 | More modern by 27 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus TG-3
EX-ZR15 | TG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR15 features exterior dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Olympus TG-3 has measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR15 versus the TG-3.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR15 and TG-3 is 93 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes purely by seeing specifications. The pic here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR15 and TG-3.
To sum up, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact megapixels so you should expect comparable quality of images although you may want to factor the production date of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-ZR15 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2012-01-09 | 2014-03-31 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 461k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT-LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 176 gr (0.39 lbs) | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 photographs | 330 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-110 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $249 | $350 |