Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
![Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR15/Casio-EX-ZR15-front.jpg)
![Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-XZ-2-iHS/Olympus-XZ-2-iHS-front.jpg)
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Casio and Olympus. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the EX-ZR15 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") provide different sensor sizing.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The EX-ZR15 was revealed 11 months earlier than the XZ-2 iHS so they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-ZR15 scores vs the XZ-2 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
EX-ZR15 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Casio EX-ZR15
XZ-2 iHS | EX-ZR15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | ![]() | January 2012 | More recent by 11 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 461k | Sharper display (+459k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
EX-ZR15 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR15 features outside dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR15 and the XZ-2 iHS.
![Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR15-vs-Olympus-XZ-2-iHS-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR15 and XZ-2 iHS is 93 and 85 respectively.
![Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR15-vs-Olympus-XZ-2-iHS-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to imagine the difference between sensor measurements purely by going over specs. The photograph underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR15 and XZ-2 iHS.
All in all, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR15 using its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh tougher and the Casio EX-ZR15 will offer greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older EX-ZR15 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
![Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR15-vs-Olympus-XZ-2-iHS-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR15-vs-Olympus-XZ-2-iHS-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-01-09 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lbs) | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 shots | 340 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-110 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $249 | $450 |