Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 300g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Launched February 2013
- Other Name is Wi-Fi
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the Galaxy Camera (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR15 was introduced 13 months before the Galaxy Camera which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-ZR15 grades versus the Galaxy Camera in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Samsung Galaxy Camera. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Samsung Galaxy Camera Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera
EX-ZR15 | Galaxy Camera |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera over the Casio EX-ZR15
Galaxy Camera | EX-ZR15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2013 | January 2012 | Newer by 13 months | |
Screen dimensions | 4.8" | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 461k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung Galaxy Camera
EX-ZR15 | Galaxy Camera | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR15 features external measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Samsung Galaxy Camera has sizing of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") with a weight of 300 grams (0.66 lbs).
See the Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR15 vs the Galaxy Camera.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR15 and Galaxy Camera is 93 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions just by seeing technical specs. The image here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR15 and Galaxy Camera.
As you have seen, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the exact same MP so you can expect comparable quality of files but you need to take the age of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-ZR15 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung Galaxy Camera | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung Galaxy Camera |
Otherwise known as | - | Wi-Fi |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-01-09 | 2013-02-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 4.8" |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.20 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 176 grams (0.39 lb) | 300 grams (0.66 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-110 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $249 | $450 |