Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST65
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
Photography Glossary Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST65 Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Samsung ST65, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is relatively similar and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR400 was brought out 2 years after the ST65 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR400 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-ZR400 grades versus the ST65 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 and Samsung ST65. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery and Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Samsung ST65
| EX-ZR400 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 25 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| ST65 | EX-ZR400 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Samsung ST65
| EX-ZR400 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR400 offers external measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST65 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-ZR400 versus Samsung ST65 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR400 compared to the ST65.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and ST65 is 92 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading specs. The image underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR400 and ST65.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Casio EX-ZR400 to offer more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR400 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung ST65 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Samsung ST65 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2011-01-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | - |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | () |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 30.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) | - |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $130 |
