Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-50
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44


91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2017

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-50, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is very close and both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR700 was brought out 5 years earlier than the WG-50 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-ZR700 matches up against the WG-50 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Ricoh WG-50. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Ricoh WG-50
EX-ZR700 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Casio EX-ZR700
WG-50 | EX-ZR700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2017 | ![]() | January 2013 | More recent by 52 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Ricoh WG-50
EX-ZR700 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR700 comes with outer measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-50 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-50 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR700 against the WG-50.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and WG-50 is 91 and 91 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to see the gap in sensor measurements only by looking through specs. The photograph below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR700 and WG-50.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the identical resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of pictures however you will want to take the release date of the cameras into account. The older EX-ZR700 will be behind in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Ricoh WG-50 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Released | 2013-01-29 | 2017-05-24 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | On, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 images | 300 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-130 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $370 | $280 |