Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB30F
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2013
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
In this write-up, we are looking at the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB30F, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the WB30F (16MP) is fairly well matched and they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-S200 was released 3 years earlier than the WB30F and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB30F being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the EX-S200 grades against the WB30F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Samsung WB30F. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung WB30F
EX-S200 | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Casio EX-S200
WB30F | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | August 2010 | Fresher by 29 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung WB30F
EX-S200 | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S200 enjoys outer measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Samsung WB30F has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB30F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-S200 and the WB30F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and WB30F is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading through specs. The photograph here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S200 and WB30F.
All in all, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Samsung WB30F to give extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The older EX-S200 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung WB30F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung WB30F |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-08-03 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lbs) | 128 gr (0.28 lbs) |
Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-120 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $0 | $180 |