Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB30F

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Samsung WB30F front
Portability
96
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Introduced August 2010
Samsung WB30F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
  • Introduced January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB30F Overview

In this write-up, we are looking at the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB30F, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the WB30F (16MP) is fairly well matched and they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The EX-S200 was released 3 years earlier than the WB30F and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB30F being a Compact camera.

Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the EX-S200 grades against the WB30F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung WB30F

 EX-S200 WB30F 
Focus manually More accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Casio EX-S200

 WB30F EX-S200 
IntroducedJanuary 2013August 2010Fresher by 29 months
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung WB30F

 EX-S200 WB30F 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly display No Touch friendly display

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-S200 enjoys outer measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Samsung WB30F has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).

Check out the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB30F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-S200 and the WB30F.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB30F size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and WB30F is 96 and 96 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading through specs. The photograph here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S200 and WB30F.

All in all, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Samsung WB30F to give extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The older EX-S200 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Portrait photography information
Samsung WB30F Portrait photography information
35
you can focus manually
good resolution (14MP)
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
35
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
features face detection focus
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Street photography information
Samsung WB30F Street photography information
57
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
64
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (128g)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Sports photography information
Samsung WB30F Sports photography information
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
45
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
features tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Travel photography info
Samsung WB30F Travel photography info
65
good resolution (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
decently wide (27mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
69
lighter than average in class (128 grams)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-S200
Landscape photography with Samsung WB30F
42
you can focus manually
decently wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
manual exposure not available
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
missing Time Lapse recording
43
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
manual mode not available
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
lack of Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-S200
Vlogging with Samsung WB30F
29
decently wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external mic port
33
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focus
lighter than average in class (128g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Samsung WB30F
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Samsung WB30F
General Information
Brand Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-S200 Samsung WB30F
Type Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2010-08-03 2013-01-07
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 4320 x 3240 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 50 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 27-108mm (4.0x) 24-240mm (10.0x)
Max aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/3.1-6.3
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech - QVGA TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction -
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 132 gr (0.29 lbs) 128 gr (0.28 lbs)
Dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-120 -
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch price $0 $180