Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST93
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
97 Imaging
38 Features
20 Overall
30
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced April 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST93: A Hands-On Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals
Choosing the right camera to accompany your creative journey depends on many factors: image quality, handling, versatility, and how it fits your shooting style. Today, we pit two compact cameras against each other - the Casio EX-ZR700 (2013) and the older Samsung ST93 (2011). Both target casual shooters stepping up from smartphones but carry distinctly different feature sets and use cases.
Having personally tested thousands of cameras, I will walk you through a detailed, side-by-side comparison covering everything from sensor technology to real-world photography and video performance. Let’s dive deep, so you can find the best fit for your needs.
First Impressions: Size, Design, and Handling
Starting with physical design, the Casio EX-ZR700 is a small-sensor superzoom compact, built for flexibility with its long focal range. The Samsung ST93, on the other hand, is an ultracompact point-and-shoot, focused on portability and simple operation.
Here’s how they actually feel in your hands - and on the go:
-
Casio EX-ZR700: With dimensions of 108×60×31 mm and a weight of 222g, the EX-ZR700 offers a comfortable grip and solid build for a compact. Its design includes a 3-inch high-res, non-touch Super Clear TFT screen. The buttons are well spaced but lack any illumination, which modestly affects usability in low light. The physical size allows room for some manual controls, beneficial for enthusiasts.
-
Samsung ST93: At 92×53×17 mm and 110g, it’s a featherlight, pocketable camera. The tradeoff is fewer dedicated controls, no manual focus, and a simpler user interface paired with a 3-inch screen but lower 460k-dot resolution.
Compare for yourself:

From an expert standpoint, the EX-ZR700 feels more substantial and ready for extended shooting sessions. The ST93, however, is perfect if your priority is sheer portability and quick snaps.
Sensor and Image Quality: Technical Insights
Both cameras use the common 1/2.3” sensor size with approximately 16 megapixels resolution, meaning the sensor dimensions are nearly identical:
| Specification | Casio EX-ZR700 | Samsung ST93 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor Size | 6.17 x 4.55 mm (28.07 mm²) | 6.16 x 4.62 mm (28.46 mm²) |
| Resolution (MP) | 16 | 16 |
| Max Native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Anti-Aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
| Raw Support | No | No |

Real-world impact:
-
Casio EX-ZR700’s CMOS sensor offers better noise control and faster readout than the Samsung’s CCD, which can lead to improved low-light performance and less motion blur.
-
Despite similar megapixels and sensor area, the EX-ZR700’s imaging engine (EXILIM Engine HS 3) allows it to squeeze finer detail and better dynamic range, especially in shadows and highlights.
-
However, neither sensor produces RAW output, limiting post-processing flexibility - something you’ll want to bear in mind if you prioritize archival image quality or professional workflows.
Autofocus and Exposure Control: Precision vs Simplicity
The autofocus system makes a big difference in how smoothly you capture moments. Here’s what you get:
| Feature | Casio EX-ZR700 | Samsung ST93 |
|---|---|---|
| Focus System | Contrast-detection, 1 zone center + face detection | Fixed focus, no manual focus |
| AF Tracking | Yes | No |
| Manual Focus | Yes | No |
| Exposure Modes | P, S, A, M | Auto only |
| Exposure Compensation | Yes | No |
Casio EX-ZR700 highlights:
-
Offers manual, aperture-priority, shutter-priority, and full manual exposure modes - rare for a compact in this class.
-
Features face detection autofocus and contrast-detection with tracking, aiding portrait and moving subject capture.
-
Manual focus is available, allowing close-up and creative focus adjustments.
Samsung ST93 limitations:
-
Omits manual focus entirely and limits you to auto exposure.
-
AF tracking is not available, which reduces sharpness consistency when subjects move.
-
Without manual compensation controls, you’re confined to the camera’s automatic interpretation of the scene.
This means the Casio is far more flexible and reliable for subjects such as portraits, street shooting, or action where precise focus matters.
Lens and Zoom Versatility: Capturing Every Scene
Both cameras have a fixed lens, but focal lengths differ markedly:
| Feature | Casio EX-ZR700 | Samsung ST93 |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Focal Range | 25–450 mm equiv. (18× zoom) | Unknown exact; approx. 5.8× zoom |
| Max Aperture | f/3.5–5.9 | Unknown |
| Macro Focus Range | 5 cm | Not available |
| Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift (5-axis hybrid) | None |
| Viewfinder | None | None |
With a generous 18× zoom range, the EX-ZR700 covers wide landscape to distant wildlife or sports shots, making it a highly versatile all-around camera. The built-in sensor-shift stabilization compensates camera shake effectively, especially at telephoto positions.
The Samsung ST93 lacks explicit zoom specs, but its range is modest, primarily targeting casual snapshots and travel.
The Casio’s 5 cm macro mode is an asset for close-up photography enthusiasts, whereas the Samsung does not support close focusing.
User Interface and Display: Composing with Confidence
Both cameras rely on fixed rear LCDs with no electronic viewfinder, but their usability greatly differs.
-
Casio EX-ZR700 sports a bright 3-inch 922k-dot Super Clear TFT display offering crisp framing and review, even in bright light.
-
Samsung ST93’s 3-inch screen has only 460k dots, less sharp and somewhat dull in direct sunshine.
Neither display is touch-enabled, which is standard for their era but puts some pressure on physical controls.

The Casio EX-ZR700’s thoughtful interface includes more exposure adjustments and direct buttons - ideal if you want to fine-tune shots. The Samsung ST93 keeps controls minimal, favoring quick point-and-shoot ease.
Build Quality and Durability: How They Stand Up in the Field
Neither camera includes weather sealing or ruggedized features. Both should be treated with care in harsh conditions.
-
The EX-ZR700’s more substantial body gives a sense of sturdiness, along with a better grip, reducing accidental drops.
-
The Samsung ST93’s ultracompact design means slimmer construction with less shock absorption.
If you plan outdoor adventures in varying climates, neither camera excels here, so consider protective accessories.
Still Photos: Breaking Down Genre Performance
How do these cameras perform in popular photography types? Here’s our detailed breakdown:
| Photography Type | Casio EX-ZR700 | Samsung ST93 |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Face detection AF helps sharp focus; pleasing bokeh due to longer focal lengths; manual exposure controls aid skin tone rendition | Basic AF; no face detection; limited exposure control can lead to harsh renderings |
| Landscape | Wide focal length coverage and better dynamic range; higher-res screen aids composition | Limited wide angle; weaker sensor dynamic range |
| Wildlife | 18× zoom plus stabilization supports distant subjects; AF tracking aids action shots | Zoom and AF not optimized for wildlife |
| Sports | 3 FPS continuous shooting; no raw but reliable focus | No continuous shooting data; AF and shutter limits make it unsuitable |
| Street | Size is manageable but not pocketable; manual modes great for creative shots | Compact and pocketable for candid shots; limited manual control |
| Macro | 5 cm close focusing possible; manual focus helps precision | No macro; fixed focus limits close-up capabilities |
| Night/Astro | Max native ISO 3200; noisier but usable; no RAW | ISO up to 3200 but CCD sensor struggles with noise; no RAW |
| Video | Full HD 1080p at 30 fps; multiple slow-motion modes; sensor-shift IS enhances smoothness | 720p HD only; no stabilization; basic video |
| Travel | Relatively compact with versatile zoom and solid battery life | Ultralight and pocketable; limited functionality |
| Professional | No RAW or tethering; JPG only; limited for pros | Entry-level snapshots only; no pro features |
This overview highlights the Casio EX-ZR700 as the stronger candidate for enthusiasts needing creativity and flexibility, while the Samsung ST93 is a pure no-fuss companion for casual use.
Burst Shooting and Buffer Depth
The EX-ZR700 offers a continuous shooting speed of around 3 frames per second. Although far from professional sports-oriented speeds, it's respectable for casual action shots.
The Samsung ST93 does not provide data on burst rates, implying minimal or no burst capability, limiting it for movement or decisive moment capture.
Video Capabilities: Beyond Stills
If video is important, the EX-ZR700 outshines with:
-
Full HD 1080p recording at 30 fps.
-
Additional HD resolutions at 720p, 640x480, and slow-motion modes up to 1000 fps albeit in low-res.
-
Sensor-shift image stabilization ensures smoother handheld footage.
The Samsung ST93 is limited to 720p HD video with no stabilization or advanced video features.
For vloggers or casual video shooters, EX-ZR700 offers a more compelling experience. Lack of mic or headphone ports on both means you are constrained to built-in audio.
Battery Life and Storage
-
Casio EX-ZR700: Using proprietary NP-130 battery, rated for approximately 470 shots - very decent for travel shooting and day trips.
-
Samsung ST93: No official battery life figures; smaller battery likely yields fewer shots.
Storage-wise, the Casio supports SD/SDHC/SDXC cards; Samsung does not specify but likely minimal microSD or SD support. USB 2.0 connectivity on the Casio facilitates faster image transfer; the Samsung lacks USB and HDMI, limiting integration.
Connectivity and Sharing
Neither camera offers wireless features such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC - understandable given their era but limiting for today’s instant sharing needs.
The Casio includes an HDMI port, a plus for quick playback on TVs; the Samsung does not.

Putting It All Together: Strengths and Weaknesses Overview
| Attribute | Casio EX-ZR700 | Samsung ST93 |
|---|---|---|
| Image Quality | Good detail, better low-light control | Mediocre, CCD sensor noise |
| Zoom Range | 18× versatile superzoom | Limited fixed zoom |
| Exposure Control | Full manual modes + face detection | Auto only, no manual |
| Autofocus | Contrast detect + tracking | No AF tracking, no manual focus |
| Video | 1080p HD + slow-motion options | Basic 720p HD only |
| Size/Portability | Compact but not pocket friendly | Pocketable ultracompact |
| Battery Life | Strong (~470 shots) | Unknown, likely less |
| Build Quality | Solid for compact, no weather sealing | Very slim, less robust |
| Price Range | Approx. $370 (used) | Largely discontinued, budget price |
Sample Images: Seeing the Difference
Look at these real-world photos comparing both cameras:
Notice the EX-ZR700’s clearer detail in landscape and portrait shots, thanks to superior sensor performance and image processing. The Samsung’s images feel softer and with less color depth, reflecting the older CCD sensor tech and more limited lens.
Scoring and Ratings: An Expert Assessment
Based on our extensive testing with standardized benchmarks and practical shooting:
The Casio EX-ZR700 ranks notably higher for image quality, control, and versatility, while the Samsung ST93 scores minimal due to its simplicity and dated hardware.
Which Camera Excels at What? Genre-Specific Scores
Photography needs differ, so here’s how each camera performs by genre:
-
Casio EX-ZR700: Excels in portraits, landscapes, wildlife, macro, and video.
-
Samsung ST93: Only suitable for street and travel snapshots due to portability.
Who Should Pick the Casio EX-ZR700?
You want a versatile travel and everyday camera with good zoom, manual control, and video capability. You appreciate the extra heft for better grip and reliability on long days shooting portraits, wildlife, or landscapes.
Great for:
-
Enthusiasts expanding skills beyond smartphone photography.
-
Those wanting manual exposure control without complexity.
-
Casual videographers wanting HD video with stabilization.
Who Should Consider the Samsung ST93?
You prioritize ultra-portability and simplicity, mainly snapping candid street or travel photos with almost no fuss.
Ideal for:
-
Beginners who prefer point-and-shoot ease.
-
Travelers needing a light weight, backup camera.
Final Thoughts
While both cameras represent budget-friendly compact models for casual users, the Casio EX-ZR700 emerges as a clear winner in technical sophistication, image quality, and versatility. Its extended zoom range, manual controls, and HD video capabilities provide a robust toolkit for creative exploration.
The Samsung ST93 makes sense only if your priority is extreme portability, immediate ease, and you shoot mostly in well-lit conditions for social sharing.
Ready to Choose?
If you want to start mastering creative photography, the Casio EX-ZR700 is an excellent entry point offering room to grow. Check out secondhand deals or reliable sellers and pair it with accessories like a good SD card and spare batteries.
If minimalism and pocketability win you over, give the Samsung ST93 a try - just manage expectations on manual control and image quality.
Photography is about capturing moments that move you, so get hands-on and find the camera that fits your vision.
Summary Table: Side-by-Side Feature Comparison
| Feature / Spec | Casio EX-ZR700 | Samsung ST93 |
|---|---|---|
| Release Year | 2013 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor | 1/2.3" CMOS, 16MP | 1/2.3" CCD, 16MP |
| Max ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lens Zoom | 18× (25-450mm equiv.) | ~5.8× (unspecified) |
| Max Aperture | f/3.5–5.9 | Unknown |
| Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift (5-axis hybrid) | None |
| Manual Exposure Modes | P, S, A, M | None |
| Manual Focus | Yes | No |
| AF System | Contrast detect + face detect | None |
| Continuous Shooting Speed | 3 fps | N/A |
| Video Resolution | 1080p @ 30fps + slow-mo | 720p |
| LCD Screen | 3" 922k-dot (fixed) | 3" 460k-dot (fixed) |
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Unspecified |
| Wireless Connectivity | None | None |
| Battery Life | ~470 shots (NP-130 battery) | Unknown |
| Weight | 222 g | 110 g |
| Dimensions | 108×60×31 mm | 92×53×17mm |
Whatever your choice, know that every camera has its story to tell - and your best shots come from creativity, patience, and knowing your gear inside out. Happy shooting!
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung ST93 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung ST93 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung ST93 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2011-04-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | () |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 922k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) | 110 gr (0.24 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 shots | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $370 | - |