Clicky

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Sony W290

Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
53
Overall
44
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 front
Portability
94
Imaging
34
Features
28
Overall
31

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Sony W290 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR700
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
  • Introduced January 2013
Sony W290
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 57 x 23mm
  • Launched February 2009
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Sony DSC-W290: A Compact Camera Showdown for Your Creative Journey

Choosing the right compact camera for your photography needs can feel overwhelming, especially with diverse options spanning different features, sensor technologies, and handling characteristics. Today, we put two compact cameras head-to-head to help you navigate which model better suits your style and requirements.

We’ll dive deep into the Casio EX-ZR700 (announced 2013) and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 (from 2009), exploring everything from sensor quality and autofocus to real-world versatility across photography genres. Both sit in the small sensor compact category but bring distinct strengths to the table.

Whether you’re capturing family moments, landscapes, or dabbling in creative macro work, this comprehensive comparison guides you through the technicalities and practicalities. Our insights come from extensive hands-on testing experience with thousands of cameras, so you get an authoritative perspective that focuses on your photographic goals.

Unpacking the Physical Experience: Size, Ergonomics, and Controls

First impressions often come from how a camera feels in your hands and how intuitive its controls are. This impacts how naturally and comfortably you interact with your gear - a big deal for street photography and on-the-go shooting.

Feature Casio EX-ZR700 Sony DSC-W290
Dimensions (W x H x D) 108 x 60 x 31 mm 98 x 57 x 23 mm
Weight 222 g 167 g
Grip and Handling Moderate grip, compact Very compact, pocketable
Control Layout Manual exposure modes, numerous direct buttons Limited manual controls, simplified button layout
Top Display Screen No No
Screen Type and Size 3" fixed Super Clear TFT LCD, 922k dots 3” fixed LCD, 230k dots

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Sony W290 size comparison

At a glance, the Sony W290 is smaller and lighter, making it discreet for street and travel photography. It easily slips into a pocket without fuss. Conversely, the Casio EX-ZR700, while still compact, is chunkier with more presence in hand - lending confidence for deliberate shooting.

The Casio’s controls reflect its ambition towards more advanced users. It offers shutter priority, aperture priority, and full manual modes - rare for compact cameras of this class and era. You’ll find direct access buttons for exposure tweaks and a traditional dial layout, giving you tactile engagement.

Sony’s W290 keeps things simple, focusing on auto and scene modes that favor snapshots over manual intervention. For beginners or casual shooters, this simplicity is attractive, though those eager for creative control may find it limiting.

From an interface design point of view:

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Sony W290 top view buttons comparison

The Casio’s extra heft supports a more confident button layout, while the Sony prioritizes portability above all.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality Deep Dive

Image quality hinges critically on sensor performance combined with lens quality and image processing. Both these cameras use the standard 1/2.3-inch sensor size but differ in sensor type, resolution, and processing engines.

Specification Casio EX-ZR700 Sony DSC-W290
Sensor Type CMOS CCD
Sensor Dimensions (mm) 6.17 x 4.55 6.17 x 4.55
Sensor Area (mm²) 28.07 28.07
Resolution (MP) 16 12
Max ISO 3200 3200
Image Processor EXILIM Engine HS 3 Not specified (proprietary)
Anti-Aliasing Filter Yes Yes
Raw Format Support No No
Aspect Ratios 4:3, 3:2, 16:9 4:3, 3:2, 16:9

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Sony W290 sensor size comparison

Though sharing the sensor size, the EX-ZR700’s CMOS sensor elevates image quality potential, especially in lower noise and better dynamic range. CMOS sensors generally have faster readout speeds and superior performance in challenging lighting compared to CCD sensors like Sony’s W290.

Our tests confirm the Casio produces sharper images with more natural color rendition and less noise at ISO 800 and above. Detail preservation in shadows and highlights is notably improved, making it preferable for landscape and portrait photography where dynamic range matters.

Sony’s CCD sensor is no slouch but displays higher noise levels beyond ISO 400, limiting usability in dim environments or indoor shooting. It maintains a pleasant color palette suitable for casual snaps but lacks the refinement you might expect for professional work or creative exploration.

Both cameras feature anti-aliasing filters which smooth fine detail but can slightly reduce sharpness. None support shooting RAW, so image manipulation relies heavily on in-camera JPEG processing and post-processing software.

Lens and Zoom Versatility for Different Scenes

Your lens focal range influences the kind of scenes you can capture - from wide vistas to distant wildlife or close-up details.

Specification Casio EX-ZR700 Sony DSC-W290
Lens Type Fixed zoom Fixed zoom
Focal Length (35mm equiv.) 25-450 mm (18x zoom) 28-140 mm (5x zoom)
Max Aperture f/3.5 – 5.9 f/3.3 – 5.2
Macro Focus Range 5 cm 10 cm
Image Stabilization Sensor-shift (sensor-shift) Optical

The Casio’s significantly longer zoom range (18x) dominates here. At 25-450 mm equivalent, you go from reasonably wide-angle to telephoto stretch suitable for casual wildlife or sports shooting. The extended reach combined with sensor-shift stabilization helps steady handheld shots across the zoom range.

Sony’s 5x zoom covers general everyday use - ideal for street and travel photography but falls short if you want more reach. Its optical stabilization complements the zoom but with less buffer against camera shake at telephoto.

Macro shooters will appreciate the Casio’s closer 5 cm minimum focusing distance compared to Sony’s 10 cm, allowing you more versatility for flower or insect shots.

Autofocus Systems and Shooting Speed in Action

Fast, accurate autofocus is paramount across many photography disciplines, particularly sports and wildlife. Let’s compare:

Feature Casio EX-ZR700 Sony DSC-W290
AF System Contrast detection, face detection, center-weighted Contrast detection, multi-area, center
Number of AF Points Unknown, supports face detection 9 AF points
AF Modes Face detection, center-weighted, AF tracking Single AF only
Continuous Shooting (fps) 3 fps 2 fps

Casio’s autofocus excels with reliable face detection and tracking functionality, useful for portraits and casual event shooting. However, its continuous autofocus during shooting is limited given no full AF-C mode in continuous shooting.

Sony has a simpler AF approach with single-shot focus only and 9 focus points laid out in a center-weighted arrangement. This is adequate for static and slow-moving subjects but not designed for fast-paced or unpredictable action.

Burst speeds modestly favor Casio’s 3 fps over Sony’s 2 fps, though both will lag behind advanced cameras whose frames-per-second rates surpass 10 fps for sports. For casual family photos and travel, these rates are generally sufficient, but neither camera targets professional action shooters.

Your Window: LCD Screens and Viewfinders

Since neither camera has an electronic viewfinder, rear LCDs are your main window for framing and reviewing.

Specification Casio EX-ZR700 Sony DSC-W290
LCD Size 3.0" 3.0"
Resolution (pixels) 922k 230k
Touchscreen No No
Viewfinder None None

Casio’s bright and detailed Super Clear TFT LCD at 922k resolution is a joy to use outdoors and delivers clear image review and menu navigation. Sony’s 230k screen is noticeably lower in resolution, which can hamper focus confirmation and image evaluation.

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Sony W290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The more refined Casio LCD combined with a better interface enhances user experience, particularly when manually adjusting exposure or focus. Sony’s simpler screen suits casual snapshots but can leave you guessing in harsh lighting.

Video Capabilities for Storytellers

Video has become a key creative outlet for many photographers, whether for vlogging or documenting events.

Feature Casio EX-ZR700 Sony DSC-W290
Max Resolution 1920 x 1080 (Full HD, 30 fps) 1280 x 720 (HD, 30 fps)
Frame Rates Up to 1000 fps in low res modes for slow motion 30 fps
Video Formats MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4
Microphone Port No No
Stabilization Sensor-shift compensates video shake Optical stabilization

The Casio clearly leads for video enthusiasts. It supports Full HD 1080p recording at 30 fps, smooth and high quality for casual clips. Plus, the camera incorporates unique ultra-high frame rate modes (up to 1000 fps) for creative super-slow-motion shots - a fun add-on for experimental video.

Sony’s video specs max out at 720p HD, reflecting its earlier release and focus on stills photography. No microphone input on either camera limits audio quality control, and neither offers advanced video features like 4K or external inputs.

Battery Life and Storage: Keep Shooting Longer

Battery endurance influences how much shoot-time you get before recharging, crucial for travel and day-long events.

Specification Casio EX-ZR700 Sony DSC-W290
Battery Type Rechargeable NP-130 Battery Pack Not specified
Approx. Battery Life 470 shots per charge Not specified
Storage Media SD/SDHC/SDXC Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal Memory

Casio provides a solid battery life estimate of 470 shots per charge, which holds well for compact super-zoom cameras. Sony’s specification is missing, but typically compact CCD cameras like the W290 range lower, around 200-300 shots.

Casio’s use of common SD card formats aids flexibility and future-proofing, whereas Sony’s reliance on proprietary Memory Sticks is a drawback, given their higher cost and lower availability.

Durability and Build: Handling the Elements

Neither camera is designed for rugged conditions:

  • No weather sealing on either model means you should avoid heavy rain or dusty environments.
  • No shock, crush, or freeze-proof ratings.
  • Both cameras should be handled with care during travel.

Price and Value: What Does Your Budget Get You?

Model Launch Price (USD) Current Price (USD approx.)
Casio EX-ZR700 $370.16 Check current retailers
Sony DSC-W290 $229.99 Check current retailers

On initial cost, the Sony is more budget-friendly, reflecting its simpler feature set and older design. Casio’s higher price parallels its advanced controls, longer zoom, and improved sensor technology.

While not flagship-level, the Casio EX-ZR700 delivers greater creative flexibility and better image quality - worthy of the price if you want more than basic snapshots.

Genre-Specific Performance: How Do They Stack Up?

Here’s a breakdown of how each camera performs across common photography types:

Genre Casio EX-ZR700 Sony DSC-W290
Portrait Good skin tone rendering, face detection AF, moderate bokeh due to sensor size Average skin tone, no face detection
Landscape Decent dynamic range, high resolution Limited dynamic range and resolution
Wildlife Telephoto reach aids distance shooting, moderate AF tracking Limited zoom, slow AF
Sports Slow burst and AF limit utility Not suited due to slow AF and burst
Street Bulkier but manageable, less discreet Small, portable, ideal for candid shots
Macro Good close focusing (5 cm), helpful stabilization Decent macro but larger minimum focusing distance
Night/Astro Better low-light ISO performance, limited by sensor size Noisy images at high ISO
Video Full HD, slow motion options HD only, basic video
Travel Versatile zoom, good battery life Compact, lighter, less versatile zoom
Professional Work Limited by lack of RAW and advanced connectivity Likewise limited

Performance Ratings Summary

Here are consolidated scores based on our multi-factor evaluations covering image quality, handling, speed, and versatility:

Sample Images: Real-World Shooting Results

To illustrate typical output quality differences, here are representative shots from both cameras - note the finer detail and color depth in the Casio’s images, especially at longer focal lengths and in low light.

Final Thoughts: Which Camera Fits Your Vision?

Choosing between the Casio EX-ZR700 and Sony DSC-W290 boils down to your priorities:

Choose the Casio EX-ZR700 if:

  • You want more creative tools like manual exposure modes.
  • You need a long zoom range for flexibility in wildlife, sports, or travel photography.
  • You value better image quality supported by CMOS sensor technology.
  • You’re interested in full HD video and creative slow-motion features.
  • You don’t mind slightly larger body size and a higher price point.

Opt for the Sony DSC-W290 if:

  • Your needs are casual snapshots and travel-friendly portability.
  • Budget is tight and you prefer a lighter, simpler camera.
  • You primarily shoot in good light and don’t require extensive zoom or manual controls.
  • You prefer minimal fuss and straightforward operation.

Getting the Most from Your Compact Camera

Regardless of your choice, here are some tips to maximize your compact camera’s potential:

  • Use a tripod or stable surface for landscapes and night shots to overcome sensor limitations.
  • Experiment with manual modes on the Casio to better control exposure and creative effects.
  • Pair your camera with appropriate accessories - extra batteries, SD cards, and lens cleaning kits improve reliability.
  • Explore post-processing software to refine JPEG images, especially since no RAW shooting is available.
  • Regularly update your camera firmware to access improvements and bug fixes.

Encouragement to Explore and Experiment

Compact cameras like the Casio EX-ZR700 and Sony W290 offer approachable ways to hone your skills and capture moments without the bulk of larger systems. Each has a place on your creative journey whether as a primary camera or a versatile backup.

We recommend visiting a camera store to hold both models if possible - handling and feel are just as important as specs. And if you decide to buy online, look for deals bundling accessories or warranty extensions for peace of mind.

With thoughtful choice and practice, either of these cameras can unlock memorable stories captured through your unique lens.

Your next step? Dive into hands-on shooting with the model that fits your budget and creative aspirations. Check out compatible accessories, read user manuals, and start framing your world with fresh eyes. We’re sure this trusted guide has brought clarity and confidence to your camera buying decision.

Happy shooting!

Casio EX-ZR700 vs Sony W290 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR700 and Sony W290
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR700Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290
General Information
Brand Name Casio Sony
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2013-01-29 2009-02-17
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip EXILIM Engine HS 3 -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-450mm (18.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.9 f/3.3-5.2
Macro focusing distance 5cm 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 922k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs 2 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.70 m 3.90 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 222 gr (0.49 lb) 167 gr (0.37 lb)
Physical dimensions 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") 98 x 57 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 470 photos -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-130 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch price $370 $230