Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung CL5
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Released February 2009
- Also Known as PL10
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung CL5 Overview
Below is a complete analysis of the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung CL5, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and CL5 (9MP) and the EX-ZR800 (1/2.3") and CL5 (1/2.5") posses different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-ZR800 was launched 4 years later than the CL5 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-ZR800 matches up against the CL5 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung CL5 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Samsung CL5. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Samsung CL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung CL5
EX-ZR800 | CL5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2013 | February 2009 | More recent by 55 months | |
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Casio EX-ZR800
CL5 | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung CL5
EX-ZR800 | CL5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR800 provides outer measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung CL5 has specifications of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung CL5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR800 against the CL5.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and CL5 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to picture the contrast in sensor measurements simply by seeing specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR800 and CL5.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR800 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Casio EX-ZR800 will produce more detail utilizing its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR800 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung CL5 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung CL5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung CL5 |
Also called | - | PL10 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2013-08-07 | 2009-02-23 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-4.5 |
Macro focus distance | 4cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lb) | 141 grams (0.31 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $429 | $391 |