Clicky

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung CL5

Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
55
Overall
46
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front
 
Samsung CL5 front
Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
14
Overall
24

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
  • Introduced August 2013
Samsung CL5
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
  • 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
  • Released February 2009
  • Also Known as PL10
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung CL5 Overview

Below is a complete analysis of the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung CL5, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and CL5 (9MP) and the EX-ZR800 (1/2.3") and CL5 (1/2.5") posses different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The EX-ZR800 was launched 4 years later than the CL5 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-ZR800 matches up against the CL5 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung CL5

 EX-ZR800 CL5 
ReleasedAugust 2013February 2009More recent by 55 months
Focus manually More accurate focusing
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution922k230kClearer display (+692k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Casio EX-ZR800

 CL5 EX-ZR800 

Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung CL5

 EX-ZR800 CL5 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison

When you are going to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR800 provides outer measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung CL5 has specifications of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung CL5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR800 against the CL5.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung CL5 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and CL5 is 91 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung CL5 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is hard to picture the contrast in sensor measurements simply by seeing specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR800 and CL5.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR800 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Casio EX-ZR800 will produce more detail utilizing its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR800 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung CL5 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung CL5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Portrait photography info
Samsung CL5 Portrait photography info
44
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
provides face detect focus
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
24
includes face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
does not have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Street photography with Samsung CL5
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (222g)
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
47
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
does not have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Sports photography with Samsung CL5
51
excellent zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
good battery pack (470 CIPA)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
16
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography advice
Samsung CL5 Travel photography advice
74
good battery pack (470 CIPA)
lighter than average in class (222g)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (25mm)
long zoom (450mm)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
51
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse function
sensor resolution low (9MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (38mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung CL5 as a Landscape photography camera
55
has manual focus
relatively wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
good battery pack (470 per charge)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
22
manual focus not available
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (38mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.5")
does not have RAW format
lack of Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Vlogging features
Samsung CL5 Vlogging features
34
relatively wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average in class (222g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
missing microphone port
25
includes face detect autofocus
wide angle not great (38mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of microphone support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung CL5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung CL5
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR800Samsung CL5
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 Samsung CL5
Also called - PL10
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Introduced 2013-08-07 2009-02-23
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip EXILIM Engine HS 3 -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.5"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 9 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 3456 x 2592
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-450mm (18.0x) 38-114mm (3.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.9 f/3.5-4.5
Macro focus distance 4cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 6.3
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 922 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 16 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.70 m 4.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 222 grams (0.49 lb) 141 grams (0.31 lb)
Physical dimensions 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 470 shots -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-130 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots One One
Price at launch $429 $391