Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 6000
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9387/c9387039ab5c223fcc36ca8de7fbd3b8f5516027" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 front"
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 6000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Launched September 2006
- Updated by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 6000 Overview
Following is a in depth overview of the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 6000, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are offered by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the 6000 (10MP) is pretty comparable but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and 6000 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-400 was unveiled 3 years earlier than the 6000 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus 6000 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-400 scores versus the 6000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 6000 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-400 & Olympus Stylus Tough 6000. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Olympus 6000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus 6000
E-400 | 6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Olympus E-400
6000 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2009 | ![]() | September 2006 | More modern by 34 months |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Sharper screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus 6000
E-400 | 6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 6000 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-400 offers exterior measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus 6000 has dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 6000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-400 against the 6000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70dd4/70dd4426743fa31c528683f8364128c69db886a4" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 6000 size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 6000 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and 6000 is 77 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad7fe/ad7fed60989b9e75443c2b61172b435d5077ebab" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 6000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 6000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 6000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to see the gap in sensor sizes only by seeing specifications. The picture here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and 6000.
Plainly, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact megapixel count albeit not the same sensor sizes. The E-400 has got the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallow DOF less difficult. The more aged E-400 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/100ef/100efa468fe69f17e9b108b67444ddd8541c96bc" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 6000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 6000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3b82/c3b820843722a068240329b0d0bd8a496d771b3b" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus 6000 Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 |
Also Known as | - | mju Tough 6000 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2006-09-14 | 2009-07-01 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus range | - | 2cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 215k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435g (0.96 lbs) | 179g (0.39 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $599 | $259 |