Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST93
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
97 Imaging
39 Features
20 Overall
31
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced August 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced April 2011
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST93 Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung ST93, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the ST93 (16MP) is fairly well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR800 was released 2 years after the ST93 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST93 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the EX-ZR800 matches up against the ST93 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST93 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Samsung ST93. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery and Samsung ST93 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Samsung ST93
EX-ZR800 | ST93 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2013 | April 2011 | Newer by 28 months | |
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Display resolution | 922k | 460k | Crisper display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Casio EX-ZR800
ST93 | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung ST93
EX-ZR800 | ST93 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST93 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR800 features outside dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Samsung ST93 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR800 and Samsung ST93 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR800 and the ST93.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and ST93 is 91 and 97 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST93 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions just by checking technical specs. The picture here may provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and ST93.
As you can tell, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution and you should expect similar quality of images though you should always factor the production date of the products into consideration. The newer EX-ZR800 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST93 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Samsung ST93 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung ST93 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Samsung ST93 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2013-08-07 | 2011-04-20 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | () |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 4cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 922k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222g (0.49 pounds) | 110g (0.24 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $429 | - |