Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm XQ2
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
92 Imaging
39 Features
57 Overall
46
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm XQ2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed January 2015
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm XQ1
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm XQ2 Overview
Below is a complete review of the Casio TRYX and Fujifilm XQ2, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the Fujifilm XQ2 (12MP) is very close but the TRYX (1/2.3") and Fujifilm XQ2 (2/3") use different sensor measurements.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe TRYX was released 5 years prior to the Fujifilm XQ2 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the TRYX grades against the Fujifilm XQ2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm XQ2 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim TRYX & Fujifilm XQ2. The complete galleries are provided at Casio TRYX Gallery & Fujifilm XQ2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Fujifilm XQ2
| TRYX | Fujifilm XQ2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ2 over the Casio TRYX
| Fujifilm XQ2 | TRYX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2015 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 49 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Clearer display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Fujifilm XQ2
| TRYX | Fujifilm XQ2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm XQ2 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio TRYX comes with external dimensions of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm XQ2 has measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Casio TRYX and Fujifilm XQ2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the TRYX against the Fujifilm XQ2.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the TRYX and Fujifilm XQ2 is 99 and 92 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm XQ2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements just by looking through technical specs. The graphic here might give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the TRYX and Fujifilm XQ2.
As you have seen, the two cameras offer the same exact resolution but different sensor measurements. The TRYX includes the smaller sensor which will make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult. The older TRYX will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm XQ2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio TRYX vs Fujifilm XQ2 Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | Fujifilm XQ2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim TRYX | Fujifilm XQ2 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2015-01-14 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | EXR Processor II |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS X-TRANS II |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 2/3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.8 x 6.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 58.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21mm (1x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/1.8-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 12.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, on, off, slow syncho |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-48 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $689 | $299 |
