Casio TRYX vs Olympus FE-3010
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
97 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Casio TRYX vs Olympus FE-3010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 108g - 93 x 56 x 18mm
- Introduced January 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio TRYX vs Olympus FE-3010 Overview
The following is a in-depth analysis of the Casio TRYX versus Olympus FE-3010, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the TRYX (12MP) and the FE-3010 (12MP) is pretty similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TRYX was released 2 years after the FE-3010 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the TRYX matches up vs the FE-3010 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio TRYX vs Olympus FE-3010 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim TRYX & Olympus FE-3010. The complete galleries are available at Casio TRYX Gallery & Olympus FE-3010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Olympus FE-3010
| TRYX | FE-3010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 25 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-3010 over the Casio TRYX
| FE-3010 | TRYX |
|---|
Common features in the Casio TRYX and Olympus FE-3010
| TRYX | FE-3010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Casio TRYX vs Olympus FE-3010 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio TRYX has got physical measurements of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Olympus FE-3010 has measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 108 grams (0.24 lbs).
Check out the Casio TRYX versus Olympus FE-3010 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select during that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the TRYX vs the FE-3010.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TRYX and FE-3010 is 99 and 97 respectively.
Casio TRYX vs Olympus FE-3010 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing technical specs. The pic underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TRYX and FE-3010.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical MP and you can expect similar quality of pictures though you will need to consider the age of the products into consideration. The more modern TRYX is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio TRYX vs Olympus FE-3010 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio TRYX vs Olympus FE-3010 Specifications
| Casio Exilim TRYX | Olympus FE-3010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim TRYX | Olympus FE-3010 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2009-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21mm (1x) | 36-108mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/8 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 108 grams (0.24 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 93 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $689 | $140 |