FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus 6000
94 Imaging
37 Features
16 Overall
28
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus 6000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Additionally Known as FinePix AV205
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus 6000 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus 6000, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the AV200 (14MP) and 6000 (10MP) but they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe AV200 was launched 19 months after the 6000 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the AV200 scores against the 6000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus 6000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix AV200 and Olympus Stylus Tough 6000. The complete galleries are provided at FujiFilm AV200 Gallery and Olympus 6000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Olympus 6000
| AV200 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the FujiFilm AV200
| 6000 | AV200 |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm AV200 and Olympus 6000
| AV200 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus 6000 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm AV200 has physical dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) whilst the Olympus 6000 has dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Take a look at the FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus 6000 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the AV200 and the 6000.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the AV200 and 6000 is 94 and 94 respectively.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus 6000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes purely by looking at a spec sheet. The image here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the AV200 and 6000.
Clearly, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should count on the FujiFilm AV200 to resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher AV200 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus 6000 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 |
| Also called | FinePix AV205 | mju Tough 6000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2009-07-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 50 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.9-5.2 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 1/4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 168 gr (0.37 lb) | 179 gr (0.39 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 images | - |
| Type of battery | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $0 | $259 |