FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung ST150F
91 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b5a1/3b5a14ce54a2ad60b75d3d81e4794c486a2f61b4" alt="FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR front FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2b34/d2b34be0402f7c9fe3c7c9ed4462bc8843f628b6" alt="Samsung ST150F front Samsung ST150F front"
96 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung ST150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 215g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Alternative Name is FinePix F305EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Released January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung ST150F Overview
Following is a in-depth assessment of the FujiFilm F300EXR versus Samsung ST150F, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the F300EXR (12MP) and ST150F (16MP) and the F300EXR (1/2") and ST150F (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The F300EXR was released 3 years earlier than the ST150F which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short view of how the F300EXR scores versus the ST150F for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung ST150F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR & Samsung ST150F. The complete galleries are viewable at FujiFilm F300EXR Gallery & Samsung ST150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F300EXR over the Samsung ST150F
F300EXR | ST150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the FujiFilm F300EXR
ST150F | F300EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2010 | More modern by 30 months |
Common features in the FujiFilm F300EXR and Samsung ST150F
F300EXR | ST150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung ST150F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The FujiFilm F300EXR offers external dimensions of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Samsung ST150F has sizing of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs).
Contrast the FujiFilm F300EXR versus Samsung ST150F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the F300EXR against the ST150F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98f27/98f27bf73a7fa9702f0dd03b3476b25aa415c9bd" alt="FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung ST150F size comparison FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung ST150F size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the F300EXR and ST150F is 91 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a035/8a035304b2020aa0fdec2026bf4f3c1c80e425bf" alt="FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung ST150F top view buttons comparison FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung ST150F top view buttons comparison"
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung ST150F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reviewing technical specs. The image underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the F300EXR and ST150F.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The F300EXR because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Samsung ST150F will offer extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged F300EXR is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de16d/de16d9a022fed63ecf33558916c9b39b2944769f" alt="FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung ST150F sensor size comparison FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung ST150F sensor size comparison"
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung ST150F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b1b9/2b1b98a3f6291f82a8d17ac5b023e48f38d193a4" alt="FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung ST150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung ST150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Samsung ST150F Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | Samsung ST150F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | Samsung ST150F |
Also Known as | FinePix F305EXR | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-07-21 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXR | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/2.5-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 1s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 215g (0.47 lbs) | 114g (0.25 lbs) |
Dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $280 | $300 |