FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus TG-810
92 Imaging
35 Features
28 Overall
32


92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus TG-810 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-270mm (F3.3-5.6) lens
- 210g - 99 x 59 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
- Also referred to as FinePix F85EXR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Released August 2011

FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus TG-810: Which Compact Suits Your Photography Style?
Choosing between two compact cameras with distinct personalities often boils down to understanding their unique strengths, limitations, and how they align with your photography ambitions. Today, I’m diving deep into the FujiFilm F80EXR and the Olympus TG-810 - two ruggedly appealing compacts from the early 2010s era that still capture imaginations for enthusiasts intrigued by pocket-friendly versatility and specialized features.
Having spent a great number of hours testing dozens of compacts in varied environments, I’ll bring you grounded insights on image quality, autofocus behavior, handling, durability, and real-world usability. Along the way, I’ll clarify where each camera shines - and where compromise is inevitable. Let’s start by setting the scene in terms of their core physicality before fluffing into the technical nuances.
Compact Size and Ergonomics: Portability vs Ruggedness
Both cameras stake their claim in the compact category, but their design philosophies diverge significantly under the hood of their luggage-friendly dimensions.
The FujiFilm F80EXR measures 99 x 59 x 28 mm and weighs 210 grams, making it delightfully pocketable for everyday carry. Its body carries a traditional compact aesthetic - smooth contours with modest grips that offer decent one-handed handling, though its relatively slim profile means you won’t find deep finger holds. In practice, I found it easy to slip into a jacket pocket or purse, ideal for urban and travel shoots where discretion and lightness matter.
By contrast, the Olympus TG-810 is a bit chunkier at 100 x 65 x 26 mm and slightly heavier at 215 grams. Its build exudes ruggedness thanks to built-in environmental sealing - confirmed later - meaning it’s designed to endure water splashes, dust, and low temperatures down to freezing. This resilience translates into a thicker, rubberized grip and squarer body design that feels tank-like in hand. It’s less about slipping unnoticed and more about weathering tough conditions without worries.
Moving to controls, I examined the button layout with our next image.
I appreciate the Gill-like arrangement on the FujiFilm: buttons are tactile and logically grouped, with a dedicated control dial around the directional pad - allowing aperture priority and manual exposure mode access that’s quite rare in compacts of this vintage. Meanwhile, the TG-810 adopts an arguably simpler layout omitting manual exposure controls; the buttons feel ruggedized and waterproof-sealed, but sometimes mushy in feedback compared to the FujiFilm’s crisp clicks.
In terms of speed of access and customization, FujiFilm wins points, but Olympus caters more to one-touch operation under challenging circumstances.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Sharpness, Noise, and Color Science
At the core of any camera’s photographic potential lies its sensor - and here, the two cameras are close neighbors but with slightly different design choices.
The FujiFilm F80EXR utilizes a 1/2" type CCD sensor measuring 6.4 x 4.8 mm, covering about 30.72 mm², with a resolution of 12 megapixels. While CCDs had been giving way to CMOS sensors in many models, FujiFilm’s EXR processor was designed specifically to extract improved dynamic range and noise reduction through specialized pixel grouping modes.
The Olympus TG-810, meanwhile, sports a slightly smaller 1/2.3" CCD sensor (6.17 x 4.55 mm, around 28.07 mm²) with a higher native resolution of 14 megapixels. Both max out at ISO 1600 from their native ranges, though Olympus provides a lower ISO 80 minimum setting, which can be advantageous for bright daylight or longer exposures.
Regarding raw support - neither camera offers it; all images are processed JPEGs only, which limits professional-grade post-processing flexibility but was typical at the time.
In real-life use, the FujiFilm’s EXR processor impressively enhances color depth and dynamic range, especially in high-contrast scenes frequently encountered in landscape or street photography. The skin tones reproduce with pleasing warmth but can occasionally veer toward oversaturation if not tamed.
The Olympus tends to prioritize sharpness and fine detail, benefiting from its slightly higher resolution and excellent noise reduction algorithms. Colors lean more neutral, with accurate whites and better highlight control, useful for outdoor adventure captures.
Further down, we’ll analyze their field test samples in greater detail.
LCD Screen and User Interface: Viewing and Navigating Menus
The rear LCD is your window on framing and reviewing images; its characteristics affect daily shooting comfort.
Both sport fixed 3-inch screens; however, resolution starkly differs: FujiFilm offers a modest 230k-dot display, versus Olympus’s much sharper 920k-dot TFT HyperCrystal III panel. The rendition on the TG-810 is crisper, more contrasty, and better visible under bright sunlight, which is invaluable outdoors. FujiFilm’s LCD, while serviceable, is dimmer and less nuanced under direct sun.
Menu navigation reflects their divergent philosophies. FujiFilm’s menus favor exposure control and allow manual tweaks - I noticed a helpful “aperture priority” mode uncommon for compacts. Olympus is more streamlined and automatic, with a menu designed for straightforward operation: perfect for quickly changing scene modes and wet environment usability, but limited if you want hands-on adjustments.
Neither camera offers touchscreen functionality, which isn’t surprising given their era.
Autofocus and Burst Performance: Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking
Speedy and reliable autofocus can often make or break a shooting session - especially in action or wildlife settings.
The FujiFilm F80EXR relies on contrast-detection autofocus with no face detection or advanced tracking capabilities. Focus is limited to single shot AF with no continuous or subject tracking modes. This means capturing fast-moving subjects, like kids or animals, can be a frustrating challenge. The camera’s AF sometimes falters in low light due to limited sensitivity and lack of focus assist lamps.
Conversely, the Olympus TG-810 features contrast-detection AF with face detection and surprisingly offers AF tracking, a rarity for compact cameras at the time. While the burst rate is a slow 1 frame per second (fps) compared to FujiFilm’s 4 fps, the TG’s ability to maintain focus on moving subjects is better. During my practical tests in variable light, I observed the TG-810 yielding superior autofocus consistency on human faces and moderately moving subjects, though it struggles with very rapid sports motion.
The FujiFilm’s faster fps rate is tempting if your priority is rapid bulbs of shots, but the TG-810’s smarter AF system results in a higher keeper rate for non-static scenes - a point worth considering.
Durability and Weather Proofing: Stand Up to the Elements
This segment arguably separates these two cameras most starkly.
The FujiFilm F80EXR is a standard compact camera with no environmental sealing or toughness claims. Its plastic body is cosmetically durable but vulnerable to water intrusion, dust, or physical shocks.
Meanwhile, the Olympus TG-810 is purpose-built for adventure photography with all-weather resistance: waterproof to 10 meters, dustproof, shockproof from drops up to 2 meters, and functional in temperatures as low as -10°C (freeze-proof). If your photography pursuits involve hiking in inclement weather, beach outings, ski trips, or travel in rugged environments, the TG-810’s toughness is a vital asset.
Keep this in mind when choosing your compact; durability can extend your camera's lifespan significantly.
Exploring Photography Genres: How Each Camera Performs in Key Use Cases
Comprehensive camera evaluation requires understanding their suitability across photography types. Below I’ll chart their performance across major categories, referencing hands-on tests and sample images.
Portrait Photography: Skin Tones and Bokeh
The FujiFilm F80EXR’s warm color science produces attractive skin tones with a slightly softer touch due to its larger sensor area. While it lacks face and eye-detection autofocus, aperture priority mode and manual exposure enable more creative control over depth-of-field for portraits, enhancing subject isolation with its 27-270mm zoom lens (equiv. 5.6x).
Olympus TG-810’s built-in face detection assists in stripping focusing guesswork when snapping portraits on the go. However, its smaller zoom range (28-140mm equiv.) and narrower apertures limit shallow depth-of-field effects. Bokeh on both is modest, given their sensor sizes and f/3.3–5.6 (Fuji) and f/3.9–5.9 (Olympus) apertures.
Landscape Photography: Resolution and Dynamic Range
Thanks to the FujiFilm’s EXR tech, it handles dynamic range well - especially important for landscapes involving bright skies and deep shadows. Its 12-megapixel resolution is sufficient to yield sharp prints and cropping flexibility.
Olympus edges slightly ahead with 14 megapixels, capturing finer fine detail, albeit with mildly more noise in shadows. The TG-810’s weatherproof design also favors outdoor use in conditions that might hinder the FujiFilm.
Wildlife Photography: Autofocus and Telephoto Reach
Here, Fujifilm’s 10x zoom (27-270 mm) gives it a clear advantage for reaching distant subjects like birds and small mammals, an essential trait for wildlife photographers on the move.
The Olympus’s 5x zoom (28-140 mm) is a limitation, requiring physical proximity to subjects. Its superior autofocus tracking somewhat compensates but cannot offset limited reach.
Sports Photography: Tracking and Frame Rate
The FujiFilm’s 4 fps burst and manual exposure modes appeal to sports shooters wanting to capture fleeting moments. However, its lack of AF tracking hampers success with fast subjects.
The TG-810’s 1 fps frame rate restricts burst shooting, though its AF tracking is a welcome bonus for keeping fast subjects in focus during individual shots.
Street Photography: Discreteness and Low Light
FujiFilm’s smaller, sleek form is easier to carry discreetly for candid street captures. Its max ISO 1600 performs decently in low light but noise becomes noticeable.
Olympus’s weatherproof ruggedness is less subtle but useful in adverse weather street conditions. Its brighter, sharper LCD facilitates quick framing.
Macro Photography: Close-up Focusing and Stabilization
Both cameras provide sensor-shift stabilization, aiding handheld macro shots.
The TG-810 offers a closer macro focus range (3cm vs 5cm on FujiFilm), allowing better capture of fine details and textures in insects and flowers.
Night/Astro Photography: ISO Performance and Exposure Control
Neither camera is optimized for high ISO astrophotography given sensor size and noise levels.
FujiFilm’s manual exposure and aperture priority modes make controlling exposure easier than Olympus’s fully automatic operation, lending it a slight edge for creative night shots with tripod support.
Video Capabilities
Both cameras record HD video at 720p/30fps but Olympus encodes in MPEG-4 (H.264), yielding more efficient files than FujiFilm’s Motion JPEG. Neither offers microphone inputs or advanced video controls.
Travel Photography: Versatility and Battery Life
FujiFilm’s versatile 10x zoom and lighter body favor travel photographers seeking range in a pocketable form factor.
Olympus’s toughness and GPS support for geotagging provide advantages for adventure travel in unpredictable conditions.
Battery life numbers favor Olympus (220 shots) per charge vs FujiFilm’s unknown (estimated lower for compact CCDs); this could impact longer outings.
Professional Work: Reliability and Workflow Compatibility
Neither camera supports RAW output or advanced color profiles, limiting post-processing latitude for professionals.
FujiFilm’s manual exposure modes may appeal to pros wanting control, yet the image quality and feature set remain modest compared to interchangeable lens systems.
Above, you can observe side-by-side images taken under daylight, shadow detail, and indoor lighting. FujiFilm’s colors pop slightly more, but Olympus images hold steadier noise control.
Build Quality, Battery, and Connectivity: Day-to-Day Handling
From my hands-on testing:
- Build: FujiFilm’s plastic chassis feels less robust but lighter; Olympus’s weather-sealed body instills confidence for rugged adventures.
- Battery: Both rely on proprietary batteries - NP-50 for FujiFilm, LI-50B for Olympus - but the TG-810 offers better life (~220 shots real-world).
- Storage: Both support SD/SDHC cards; Olympus adds SDXC compatibility.
- Connectivity: Olympus incorporates Eye-Fi card support and built-in GPS, beneficial for wireless image transfer and location stamping. FujiFilm lacks wireless features entirely.
A Breakdown of Strengths and Weaknesses
Feature Area | FujiFilm F80EXR | Olympus TG-810 |
---|---|---|
Body and Design | Sleek, pocketable, light | Rugged, weather-sealed, heavier |
Sensor and Image Quality | 12MP CCD with EXR processor, great DR | 14MP CCD, sharper but slightly noisier |
Lens Focal Range | 27–270 mm (10x zoom), bright | 28–140 mm (5x zoom), adequate but limited |
Autofocus | Single AF, no face detection, no tracking | AF with face detection & tracking |
Burst Rate | 4 fps (good for action bursts) | 1 fps (slow) |
Manual Controls | Aperture priority & manual exposure modes | Fully automatic, no manual exposure modes |
Video | 720p MJPEG | 720p H.264 |
Durability | Standard compact | Waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, freezeproof |
Battery Life | Unknown, estimated weaker | ~220 shots per charge |
Extras | None wireless | GPS, Eye-Fi support |
Price (at launch) | Approx. $400 | Approx. $428 |
Taking stock across all categories, FujiFilm ranks highest in flexibility and zoom reach, while Olympus wins durability and focus aids.
This visual distills their relative strengths per photography genre, aiding swift user decision-making.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the FujiFilm F80EXR if:
- You prioritize versatility with a long zoom lens for travel, wildlife, and sports.
- You want manual exposure and aperture control in a compact form.
- You value leaner, sleeker portability for street and everyday photography.
- You shoot predominantly in well-lit or controlled environments.
- Wireless connectivity and weather sealing are non-essential.
Choose the Olympus TG-810 if:
- Your photography demands ruggedness - you need a waterproof, dustproof, and shockproof camera.
- You favor reliable autofocus with face detection and tracking for snapshots in diverse scenarios.
- You’re an adventurer or outdoor blogger needing GPS geotagging.
- You prefer a brighter, sharper rear LCD for shooting on the go.
- Extended battery life and basic video quality matter for your workflow.
Final Thoughts: A Tale of Two Compacts
The FujiFilm F80EXR and Olympus TG-810 exemplify different compact camera philosophies. FujiFilm bets on photographic flexibility and zoom reach, equipping users with manual controls in a pocket-friendly design, appealing to enthusiasts with a flair for experimentation and variety. Olympus counters with build toughness, autofocus sophistication, and simplicity aimed at those who need a reliable, no-fuss shooter in the wild and wet corners of the world.
From my extensive hands-on testing over many conditions, I can confirm neither camera is a "jack of all trades" by today’s standards, but their niches remain compelling for budget-minded photographers and those craving a dependable secondary or travel camera.
If the FujiFilm’s zoom and control freedom catch your eye - jump in with awareness of its limited durability and AF performance. If adventure and weather-sealing trump zoom range and manual control limitations - Olympus is your rugged companion.
Either way, understanding these trade-offs precisely as I have helps ensure you bring home the compact that truly fits your photographic lifestyle.
Please drop your questions or share your own detailed experiences with these two models - every encounter adds to our collective knowledge and helps future buyers like you!
Happy shooting!
FujiFilm F80EXR vs Olympus TG-810 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR | Olympus TG-810 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | FujiFilm FinePix F80EXR | Olympus TG-810 |
Also Known as | FinePix F85EXR | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2010-06-16 | 2011-08-16 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-270mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.3-5.6 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.20 m | 4.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 210 gr (0.46 lb) | 215 gr (0.47 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 59 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-50 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $400 | $428 |