FujiFilm HS10 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS
60 Imaging
33 Features
50 Overall
39
89 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
FujiFilm HS10 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 666g - 131 x 91 x 126mm
- Launched July 2010
- Also referred to as FinePix HS11
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Released January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm HS10 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS: A Hands-On, In-Depth Comparison for Enthusiasts
Choosing the right superzoom camera comes down to understanding the strengths and limitations in your intended shooting environment. Both the FujiFilm FinePix HS10 and Olympus SZ-16 iHS target photographers who crave big zoom ranges in a compact package - but they approach that goal quite differently. Having tested thousands of cameras over many years, I’m excited to dive into what truly separates these two from each other and whether one might best fit your photographic endeavors.
In this comparison, I’ll walk you through every crucial aspect - from sensor tech and ergonomics to autofocus performance and video capabilities. Whether you’re shooting portraits, chasing wildlife, or just want a versatile travel companion, you’ll find actionable insights that go beyond spec sheets.
Size and Handling: Classic Bridge vs. Compact Convenience
Let’s start by sizing up these cameras, because form factor can heavily influence your shooting experience.

The FujiFilm HS10 is a classic bridge camera, built around a robust SLR-like body. Its dimensions (131mm x 91mm x 126mm) and heft (666g) give it the tactile feel of a DSLR - it commands a confident grip and offers an intuitive, manual-friendly layout. The ersatz SLR shape isn’t just cosmetic; it allows for dedicated dials and buttons that truly reward manual control enthusiasm. If you appreciate tactile exposure wheels and a built-in electronic viewfinder, the HS10 really delivers on that front.
In contrast, the Olympus SZ-16 iHS shrinks down the superzoom experience into a compact, pocketable package (108mm x 70mm x 40mm, 226g). It’s much lighter and more discreet, ideal for casual shooting or street photography where less is more. However, the smaller body naturally means less room for physical controls - most settings depend on menus, which can feel sluggish or unwieldy if you favor rapid access.
I often find that photographers who lean toward technical precision and long shooting sessions prefer the FujiFilm’s bulk, while the Olympus suits travelers or street shooters who prioritize portability. The FUJI is more comfortable for prolonged handheld use, especially with its pronounced grips, while the Olympus makes a dream travel companion when packing light.
Design & Controls: Intuitive Manual or Simplified Operation?
Peeking at the top view of each, the user interface philosophy becomes even clearer.

The HS10’s top deck is thoughtfully laid out: dials for shutter speed and exposure compensation, a mode dial with aperture priority, shutter priority, and manual modes, plus a dedicated movie record button. I appreciate the “SLR-like” approach - these tactile controls enable fast, confident adjustments without taking eyes off the scene. The electronic viewfinder (though not very high resolution) further helps compose in bright light or when you want stability.
Olympus, on the other hand, relies mainly on a simple mode dial with fewer manual options. No manual exposure, no shutter priority, no aperture priority modes - it’s a mostly “point-and-shoot” style operation with some scene modes. The lack of an electronic viewfinder is a big downside if you often shoot in bright conditions, where LCD glare becomes troublesome. The 3-inch fixed LCD is crisp but lacks tilt articulation, limiting creative shooting angles.
For users comfortable with manual exposure or who want to learn the ropes more rigorously, the HS10 is a clear winner. Olympus caters more to casual photographers wanting straightforward operation without the fuss.
Sensor and Image Quality: More Pixels or Better Pixels?
Beneath the lens lies a key determinant of image quality: the sensor.

Both cameras use a 1/2.3-inch sensor - a tiny chip by enthusiast or professional standards - about 6.17 x 4.55 mm in size. This small sensor size means inherent limitations in noise control and dynamic range.
The FujiFilm HS10 offers a 10-megapixel BSI-CMOS sensor, notable back in 2010. The backside illumination helps slightly with low light, though the resolution is modest by today’s standards. It supports RAW capture, which photographers seeking maximum post-processing flexibility will appreciate. The lack of sensor size improvement and the moderate resolution hampers fine detail but also helps reduce noise at base ISO.
In contrast, the Olympus SZ-16 iHS bumps the resolution to 16 megapixels, all packed on the same tiny sensor size. While 16MP yields larger image files (and more pixel-level detail), it also pushes sensor noise levels higher, especially above ISO 400. Unfortunately, the SZ-16 lacks RAW support, so you’re stuck with JPEGs directly from the camera processing - limiting editing latitude down the line.
Image quality in daylight is decent on both, but under challenging conditions, expect more noise and less latitude to recover highlights/shadows. Between the two, I’d lean toward the HS10 for image quality improvements via RAW, though the Olympus can produce sharper images at lower ISOs due to the higher pixel count.
Display and Viewfinder: How You Frame Makes a Difference
For composing your shots, display and viewfinder quality count greatly.

The FujiFilm HS10 sports a 3-inch tilting LCD with 230k dots resolution - low by modern standards but better in that it can tilt to aid shooting at awkward angles (low or overhead). The side tilt mechanism enhances compositional creativity, though the screen is on the dimmer side and can be tough to read in direct sunlight. The built-in electronic viewfinder (EVF) has about 97% coverage and helps shooting stability or scenes where LCD readability dips.
Olympus’ 3-inch fixed TFT LCD doubles the resolution (460k dots), offering sharper and brighter previews. However, its fixed position significantly restricts creative angles, and there’s no EVF, which I miss for outdoor use or fast subject tracking.
From my own experience, a tilting screen paired with an EVF makes a huge difference when shooting outdoors or in multi-faceted scenarios. FujiFilm’s solution gives you that versatility; Olympus sacrifices it in the name of compactness and brightness.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Catching the Moment When It Counts
Autofocus system capabilities can be make-or-break, especially for moving subjects.
Both cameras rely on contrast detection AF systems - nothing particularly cutting-edge here - but there are important nuances.
The HS10 offers single, continuous, and tracking AF modes, even several focus points, though numbers aren’t specified. It unfortunately does not support face or animal eye AF. But its continuous AF and decent tracking help in wildlife or action snapshots, and with faster burst speeds (up to 10 fps), it’s more suited to capturing fast sequences of motion.
Olympus’ SZ-16 iHS lacks manual focus, supports only single AF and tracking, uses face detection, yet lacks continuous AF mode. Burst shooting is much slower at 2 fps, which diminishes its usefulness for sports or wildlife.
Overall, the HS10 is superior for sports, wildlife, or any scenario requiring fast autofocus and frame rates. The Olympus is better for decisive, single-shot captures or casual shooting where action is slower-paced.
Lens and Zoom Power: Freaking Out Over the Zoom
Both cameras are fixed-lens superzooms offering impressive reach but tailored for different priorities.
The FujiFilm HS10 impresses with an ultra-telephoto 24-720mm equivalent (30x zoom) lens at bright F2.8-5.6 aperture across the range. This vast focal breadth lets you shoot everything from wide landscapes to distant wildlife without changing lenses. The bright maximum aperture at the wide end helps low-light shooting and depth of field control.
Olympus trades maximum range for compactness, offering 25-600 mm equivalent (24x zoom) with a slower aperture of F3.0-6.9, meaning less light capture at longer focal lengths. The SZ-16’s shorter zoom span and narrower aperture reduce its ability to isolate subjects or shoot at distance in low light.
FujiFilm also shines in macro capability, focusing at just 1 cm, allowing for up-close details with creamy bokeh. Olympus doesn’t specify macro range, so it’s less capable in this department.
The HS10's lens versatility and speed translate to more creative freedom and better performance in varied light - key advantages for enthusiasts unwilling to lug multiple glass.
Burst, Buffer, and Shutter: How Fast Can You Shoot?
If you’re into fast-action photography, the shooting speed and buffer depth become critical.
FujiFilm HS10 boasts a 10 fps continuous shooting speed, remarkable for its class and era. This enables capturing fleeting moments in sports or wildlife. The shutter speed range of 30s to 1/4000s adds flexibility for both long exposures and fast freezes.
Olympus SZ-16 iHS manages only a 2 fps burst and a shutter speed range of just 4s to 1/2000s. The shorter shutter ceiling limits freezing extremely fast motion with precision.
In my hands, the HS10’s speed means you’re less likely to miss peak action - whether an athlete mid-flight or bird in sudden flight. The Olympus suits more deliberate shooting styles.
Video Recording: Beyond Still Images
For hybrid shooters wanting video capabilities, the two cameras diverge again.
The HS10 records Full HD 1080p video at 30 fps using H.264 codec. It also offers various slower-motion modes down to ultra-slow at 1000 fps (albeit at very low resolutions). Though lacking external microphone input and headphone output, video quality is respectable for casual use.
By contrast, Olympus tops out at 720p HD video at 30 fps with good codec support (H.264), but no advanced slow-motion modes or external audio ports. Video also lacks continuous autofocus due to single AF focusing mechanism.
Neither camera is optimized for professional video, but if your priorities include decent Full HD capture and some creative slow-mo, FujiFilm wins hands down.
Battery Life and Storage: Running Time Matters
With portable cameras, battery endurance can make or break a shoot.
FujiFilm HS10 relies on four AA batteries - convenient since AAs are ubiquitous worldwide, but heavier and less efficient than rechargeables. Battery life isn’t officially rated, but expect moderate performance, about 200–300 shots per charge with good usage.
Olympus SZ-16 uses a proprietary LI-50B battery rated for about 220 shots per charge. It’s lighter and more compact but requires carrying a charger or spares.
Storage-wise, both use SD/SDHC cards with a single slot. Olympus supports SDXC cards, helpful for high-capacity storage.
If you prefer flexibility and quick AA swaps during travel, FujiFilm might be your pick. For lighter overall weight and a rechargeable lithium setup, Olympus suits better.
Connectivity and Extras: What’s Missing?
Neither model offers Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS - a reflection of their launch eras and market positioning. Both have USB 2.0 and HDMI outputs for file transfer and playback.
Neither includes touchscreen displays or illuminated buttons, limiting modern ease-of-use conveniences. Environmental sealing, weatherproofing, or rugged features are also absent, so both cameras require care in adverse conditions.
Real-World Performance: Which Excels Where?
How these specs translate into actual photos across photographic styles helps ground the comparison.
Portraits
FujiFilm’s longer zoom with bright aperture and RAW support let you create portraits with tighter framing and smoother background blur, enabling pleasant bokeh. The lack of face/eye detection AF is unfortunate but manual focus capability somewhat compensates for this.
Olympus’ smaller aperture lens reduces bokeh potential, and no RAW support reduces post-process flexibility with skin tones. However, face detection autofocus helps nail focus during spontaneous portraits.
Landscape
Both cameras capture plenty of resolution for web sharing. FujiFilm’s RAW files and wider aperture give more dynamic range control and detail retention, while Olympus edges ahead with 16MP resolution but at expense of noise control.
Neither has weather sealing, so caution in rough outdoor use is advised. The FujiFilm’s bigger body affords better handling on uneven terrain.
Wildlife & Sports
FujiFilm’s 30x zoom, 10 fps burst, and continuous AF system make it the clear winner for action photography. Olympus’ 24x zoom, slower bursts, and limited AF require patience and compromise.
Street Photography
Olympus shines here due to its compactness, light weight, and discreet design. FujiFilm’s bulk can be obtrusive, though AF speed and zoom power might still appeal to those focusing on wildlife in urban parks.
Macro
FujiFilm enables extremely close focus at 1 cm, excellent for close-up details with strong background separation. Olympus doesn’t claim a macro mode, limiting performance.
Night & Astro
Small sensors and modest ISO max limit true night photography on both. FujiFilm’s RAW helps salvage files, and the wider aperture assists low light compared to Olympus. Long exposures (up to 30s) on FujiFilm HS10 offer some astrophotography potential - Olympus tops out at 4s shutter, which restricts this use.
Video
FujiFilm’s Full HD capabilities at 30 fps outperform Olympus’ 720p cap. Both lack advanced audio or stabilization features common in modern cameras.
Travel
Olympus’ pocket size and lower weight win for travel convenience and casual photography. FujiFilm is bulkier but offers more photographic control and versatility.
Professional Use
Neither camera is ideal as a primary professional tool due to sensor limitations and lack of robust workflow integration (e.g., no tethering support). FujiFilm’s RAW support and manual controls make it more suitable as a secondary or backup camera for serious enthusiasts.
Image Stabilization: Handheld Shooting Confidence
Both models utilize sensor-shift image stabilization, crucial given the long zoom focal lengths prone to camera shake.
The FujiFilm’s sensor-shift system works well up to about 1/15s at telephoto, while Olympus provides similar performance. Neither claims lens-based or hybrid IS, so low-light zoomed shots require a steady hand or tripod.
In practice, stabilization improved keeper rates noticeably on both cameras, allowing handheld shots at longer exposures than otherwise possible.
Price and Value: Stretching Your Dollar
Released several years apart, price differs widely.
- FujiFilm HS10 typically retails (or resells) around $900.
- Olympus SZ-16 iHS sells new for roughly $230.
The FujiFilm trades a significant price premium for larger zoom range, manual controls, an electronic viewfinder, RAW shooting, and faster bursts.
Olympus offers solid basic superzoom functionality at a friendly price and compact size, but sacrifices many enthusiast features in the bargain.
If your budget is tight and you want a simple zoom camera, the Olympus is a smart value buy. If you want a more capable all-rounder and are willing to invest, the FujiFilm HS10 proves its higher cost with key professional-grade features.
Final Verdict: Which Camera Suits Your Style?
For photographers with serious meetup aspirations - to learn manual controls, shoot fast action, and prioritize image quality - the FujiFilm HS10 remains a compelling choice. Its bridge-style ergonomics, long 30x zoom, RAW files, and 10 fps burst provide a lot of creative power in an affordable vintage package.
On the other hand, if you want a lightweight, pocketable superzoom that does well for casual travel, family snapshots, and street photography, the Olympus SZ-16 iHS offers a no-fuss experience with decent image quality and the convenience of a higher-resolution fixed screen.
Here’s how I break down recommended use cases:
-
Choose FujiFilm HS10 if you:
- Prioritize zoom reach and manual controls
- Shoot wildlife, sports, or fast action
- Value RAW capture for post-processing
- Want a viewfinder for bright outdoor shooting
- Don’t mind a heavier, bigger body
-
Choose Olympus SZ-16 iHS if you:
- Need a compact, lightweight camera for everyday use
- Prefer one-button ease and face-detection AF
- Mostly shoot in good light and don’t require extensive manual control
- Are on a budget and want solid zoom without complexity
In sum, the FujiFilm HS10 puts enthusiast features front and center - an articulate tool for intentional photography. The Olympus SZ-16 iHS sacrifices complexity and lens speed for sheer convenience and portability.
I hope this detailed comparison helps you decide which superzoom aligns with your photography style and goals. Feel free to reach out with questions or for further hands-on tips exploring these cameras. Happy shooting!
Appendix: Summary Table
| Feature | FujiFilm HS10 | Olympus SZ-16 iHS |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Size & Type | 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS, 10MP RAW | 1/2.3" CMOS 16MP JPEG-only |
| Lens Zoom | 24-720mm (30x), F2.8-5.6 | 25-600mm (24x), F3.0-6.9 |
| Autofocus Modes | Single, continuous, tracking | Single + tracking, face detect |
| Max Burst Speed | 10 fps | 2 fps |
| Video | 1080p 30fps Full HD | 720p 30fps HD |
| Viewfinder | Electronic (97% coverage) | None |
| Screen | 3" Tilting, 230k dots | 3" Fixed, 460k dots |
| Manual Exposure Modes | Yes (P, A, S, M) | No |
| Storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Battery | 4 x AA batteries | LI-50B rechargeable |
| Weight | 666g | 226g |
| Price (approx.) | $900 | $230 |
Let your photography ambitions and lifestyle guide your choice - both cameras have something unique to offer!
FujiFilm HS10 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix HS10 | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix HS10 | Olympus SZ-16 iHS |
| Also called as | FinePix HS11 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-07-06 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 666g (1.47 pounds) | 226g (0.50 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 131 x 91 x 126mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 5.0") | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $900 | $230 |