FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Samsung WB35F
58 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7652/e76529f3a33205b9e271789bf2d53f2ea01ca4ff" alt="FujiFilm FinePix HS20 EXR front FujiFilm FinePix HS20 EXR front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f91/52f9140fa7006285dc43ba7d1f1fb45d41f5684b" alt="Samsung WB35F front Samsung WB35F front"
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 730g - 131 x 91 x 126mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Also Known as FinePix HS22 EXR
- Renewed by Fujifilm HS30EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Following is a extensive analysis of the FujiFilm HS20 EXR and Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the HS20 EXR (16MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is relatively comparable but the HS20 EXR (1/2") and WB35F (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The HS20 EXR was introduced 4 years prior to the WB35F which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the FujiFilm HS20 EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the HS20 EXR matches up vs the WB35F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix HS20 EXR & Samsung WB35F. The whole galleries are available at FujiFilm HS20 EXR Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm HS20 EXR over the Samsung WB35F
HS20 EXR | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the FujiFilm HS20 EXR
WB35F | HS20 EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 36 months |
Common features in the FujiFilm HS20 EXR and Samsung WB35F
HS20 EXR | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm HS20 EXR features external dimensions of 131mm x 91mm x 126mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 5.0") having a weight of 730 grams (1.61 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has proportions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the FujiFilm HS20 EXR and Samsung WB35F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the HS20 EXR compared to the WB35F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae592/ae592327e55f566373c1487ad25aab5bff246488" alt="FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Samsung WB35F size comparison FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Samsung WB35F size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the HS20 EXR and WB35F is 58 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33884/33884b3621b91bdfac0820225c5b867dc4ca7286" alt="FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison"
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes purely by going through specs. The image here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the HS20 EXR and WB35F.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide the same megapixel count albeit different sensor sizes. The HS20 EXR includes the bigger sensor which should make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult. The more aged HS20 EXR will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5492/b5492bd5582ee00083f7f55675d4fd7d556ec7cd" alt="FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison"
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a026/2a0269d2708dc4adfd27b68faf4160d49984b98b" alt="FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
FujiFilm HS20 EXR vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix HS20 EXR | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix HS20 EXR | Samsung WB35F |
Also referred to as | FinePix HS22 EXR | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXR | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 80 fps), 320 x 112 (320 fps), 320 x 240 (160 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 730 grams (1.61 pounds) | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 131 x 91 x 126mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 5.0") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | 4 x AA | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $600 | $130 |