FujiFilm JV200 vs Samsung WB35F
96 Imaging
37 Features
18 Overall
29
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
FujiFilm JV200 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 125g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Released January 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix JV205
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm JV200 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
The following is a extended analysis of the FujiFilm JV200 versus Samsung WB35F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the JV200 (14MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is pretty comparable and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe JV200 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the WB35F which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the JV200 grades versus the WB35F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm JV200 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix JV200 and Samsung WB35F. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm JV200 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm JV200 over the Samsung WB35F
| JV200 | WB35F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the FujiFilm JV200
| WB35F | JV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 36 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the FujiFilm JV200 and Samsung WB35F
| JV200 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
FujiFilm JV200 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera often, you should factor its weight and volume. The FujiFilm JV200 has got physical dimensions of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the FujiFilm JV200 versus Samsung WB35F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the JV200 and the WB35F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the JV200 and WB35F is 96 and 93 respectively.
FujiFilm JV200 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to envision the gap in sensor dimensions merely by going through a spec sheet. The picture here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the JV200 and WB35F.
Clearly, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Samsung WB35F to produce greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged JV200 will be behind in sensor tech.
FujiFilm JV200 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
FujiFilm JV200 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Samsung WB35F |
| Also called | FinePix JV205 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 pounds) | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | - |
| Battery format | AA | - |
| Battery ID | - | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD / SDHC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $49 | $130 |
