Clicky

FujiFilm JZ500 vs Panasonic ZS60

Portability
93
Imaging
36
Features
24
Overall
31
FujiFilm FinePix JZ500 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 front
Portability
88
Imaging
43
Features
63
Overall
51

FujiFilm JZ500 vs Panasonic ZS60 Key Specs

FujiFilm JZ500
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.3-5.6) lens
  • 168g - 97 x 57 x 29mm
  • Introduced June 2010
  • Also Known as FinePix JZ505
Panasonic ZS60
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
  • 282g - 112 x 64 x 38mm
  • Released January 2016
  • Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ80
  • Old Model is Panasonic ZS50
  • Updated by Panasonic ZS70
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

FujiFilm FinePix JZ500 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60: A Hands-On Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals

Choosing the right compact camera can be a challenge, especially when models come from different eras with distinct feature sets. Today, we’re diving deep into a direct comparison between two intriguing small-sensor compacts: the FujiFilm FinePix JZ500, launched in 2010, and the later, more advanced Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (a.k.a. Lumix TZ80), from 2016.

Both cameras target casual yet versatile photography, but they differ markedly in technology, handling, and capabilities. Over years of testing hundreds of cameras in various conditions, I’ve learned that understanding a camera’s strengths and limitations in real-world use, combined with clear technical insights, is crucial to help you make the best choice.

Let’s explore how these two stack up in size, sensor tech, image quality, autofocus, and suitability across photography genres like portraiture, landscapes, wildlife, and more. Whether you’re a budding enthusiast or a working professional considering a compact secondary, this detailed comparison will guide you to the best pick.

First Impressions: Size, Build, and Ergonomics

FujiFilm JZ500 vs Panasonic ZS60 size comparison

Right out of the gate, size and comfort impact your shooting experience significantly. The FujiFilm JZ500 is a classic compact with a lightweight, pocketable profile - measuring 97 x 57 x 29 mm and weighing just 168 grams. Its design is minimalist, with a fixed 2.7-inch screen and no electronic viewfinder (EVF), weighing favorably for travelers prioritizing minimal gear.

By contrast, the Panasonic ZS60 is larger and more substantial at 112 x 64 x 38 mm and 282 grams, reflecting its extended zoom capability and more complex feature set. It includes a 3-inch touchscreen and a high-resolution EVF, appealing if you appreciate framing through a viewfinder in bright daylight or want tactile control.

FujiFilm JZ500 vs Panasonic ZS60 top view buttons comparison

After handling both, the ZS60’s controls feel more advanced, housing physical dials for aperture and shutter priority modes alongside a well-placed joystick for AF point selection. The JZ500 adopts a simpler button array with fewer customization options - no manual exposure modes, no dedicated AF point selector - integrated into a pocket-friendly shell.

Takeaway: If portability and lightness come first, JZ500 is easy to carry and use casually. For more manual control and better handling, especially with bigger hands, ZS60 offers a more refined experience.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of Photography

FujiFilm JZ500 vs Panasonic ZS60 sensor size comparison

Both cameras employ the same sensor size class - 1/2.3 inch CMOS for Panasonic and CCD for FujiFilm - approximately 6.17 x 4.55 mm sensor area, equating to 28.07 mm². However, sensor tech evolution across six years makes a big difference:

  • The JZ500 has a 14MP CCD sensor, with a maximum ISO of 1600 (3200 boosted), typical for its era. Its CCD sensor prioritizes moderate color rendition but presents limitations in noise performance and dynamic range.
  • The ZS60 uses an 18MP CMOS sensor, native ISO range 80-3200 (boosted 6400), with improved noise handling and a broader dynamic range.

Measured by DxOMark (37 overall score for ZS60 vs untested for JZ500), the Panasonic’s sensor provides more flexibility in postproduction and cleaner images at low light.

In field tests, the ZS60 delivers clearer detail, sharper edges, and notably better high ISO performance. The JZ500 images show more noise starting at ISO 400, and highlights can clip earlier.

Pros of ZS60 Sensor:

  • Higher resolution for printing or cropping
  • Superior dynamic range capturing scene details
  • Better noise control under dim conditions

FujiFilm JZ500:

  • Serviceable for daylight and casual shots
  • Less versatile in shadows and highlight details

LCD Screen and Viewfinder Experience

FujiFilm JZ500 vs Panasonic ZS60 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The FujiFilm’s 2.7-inch, 230k-dot fixed LCD is basic, affecting focus accuracy and image review clarity. It lacks touchscreen capabilities, so navigating menus or changing settings is slower and less intuitive.

The Panasonic ZS60 shines here with a 3-inch, 1040k-dot touchscreen LCD, which allows tap-to-focus, swipes for browsing images, and faster menu navigation - a significant benefit when shooting on the go.

Additionally, ZS60 includes a high-res electronic viewfinder offering 100% coverage and 0.46x magnification. This proves invaluable in challenging lighting, avoiding screen glare and facilitating steady composition.

Summary:

  • ZS60’s viewfinder and touchscreen add flexible shooting scenarios, particularly outdoors and in rapid situations.
  • JZ500’s screen suffices for casual framing but feels outdated today.

Lens and Zoom Performance

The lens specs highlight a major divergence:

  • JZ500: 28-280mm equivalent; 10x zoom; max aperture f/3.3–5.6
  • ZS60: 24-720mm equivalent; 30x zoom; max aperture f/3.3–6.4

The ZS60’s 30x zoom is a clear winner for wildlife and sports photography, letting you reach distant subjects without compromising image quality drastically. Of course, the smaller aperture at long end (f/6.4) may require good lighting or higher ISO settings.

FujiFilm’s 10x zoom is more modest but sufficient for everyday shooting and travel photography, with better lens sharpness throughout the range compared to superzoom lenses - often a tradeoff in optical performance.

Macro Focus:

  • Both cameras offer close focus distances around 2-3 cm, which perform reasonably in casual macro shots, but neither excels in precision or magnification required by dedicated macro enthusiasts.

Autofocus: Speed, Accuracy, and System Features

The autofocus (AF) systems are fundamentally different.

  • FujiFilm JZ500: Contrast-detection AF only, single AF mode, no face detection or tracking, no continuous AF. This means slower AF acquisition, especially in low light, and less reliable subject tracking.

  • Panasonic ZS60: Advanced Contrast AF with 49 points plus face detection, continuous AF, touch AF on the screen, and subject tracking. While it lacks phase detection, the algorithms compensate well, yielding reliable focus performance.

In my hands-on testing, the ZS60 locks focus significantly faster, tracks moving subjects during burst shooting, and adjusts quickly in changing scenes. The JZ500 often hunts for focus under challenging conditions.

For sports or wildlife photography, autofocus responsiveness is critical; here, the ZS60 is far superior, although neither camera matches the speed of higher-end mirrorless systems.

Burst Shooting and Continuous Performance

Continuous shooting capabilities differ sharply:

  • JZ500: No continuous shooting mode available.
  • ZS60: Up to 10fps burst at full resolution with continuous AF.

For action or wildlife photographers needing to capture fleeting moments, the ZS60 clearly provides an advantage.

Image Stabilization

Both cameras include image stabilization crucial for handheld shooting, especially at telephoto:

  • JZ500: Sensor-shift stabilization, electronically controlled.
  • ZS60: Optical image stabilization, proven more effective in reducing motion blur, especially with longer focal lengths.

In field conditions, Panasonic’s optical IS offered noticeably steadier shots, especially useful in low-light handheld photography.

Video Capabilities

A huge leap separates these cameras in video:

  • FujiFilm JZ500: Limited to HD 720p at 24 fps, with motion JPEG compression – resulting in large, less efficient files.
  • Panasonic ZS60: 4K UHD recording at 30p and Full HD at 60p with modern codecs (MPEG-4, AVCHD), plus 4K photo mode for extracting high-resolution stills from video.

If video is a consideration, the ZS60’s capabilities open avenues for sharp, detailed footage and creative shooting modes. The JZ500’s video is basic and largely discouraged except for casual use.

Battery Life and Storage

  • JZ500: Uses NP-45A battery, with unspecified battery life figures. Older compact cameras tend to need frequent charging, especially with LCD usage.
  • ZS60: Rated for approximately 320 shots per charge, more in line with modern compact cameras, helping extended shooting sessions.

Both use SD/SDHC cards, but the ZS60 supports SDXC, allowing larger and faster memory cards optimal for 4K video and burst shooting.

Connectivity and Additional Features

  • JZ500: Lacks wireless features, HDMI output, GPS, or touchscreen.
  • ZS60: Incorporates built-in wireless for image transfer and remote control via phone, HDMI output for easy playback, and a flexible touchscreen interface.

These additions make the Panasonic ZS60 a more versatile tool in a modern workflow.

Performance Ratings and Genre-Specific Suitability

Using my rigorous lab tests and real-world shooting sessions, the Panasonic ZS60 consistently scored higher across image quality, autofocus, video, and overall user experience.

Here’s how these cameras measure up across popular photography types:

Portrait Photography

  • ZS60: Face detection autofocus improves eye sharpness; higher resolution sensor and raw support allow better skin tone rendition and detailed editing. Bokeh, while limited by small sensor, is satisfactory given zoom range.
  • JZ500: No face detection, fewer pixels, limited editing flexibility. Fixed zoom and aperture restrict bokeh creativity.

Landscape Photography

  • ZS60: Higher resolution, better dynamic range, and raw editing ability enable superior landscapes. Still limited by small sensor, but better than JZ500.
  • JZ500: Lower dynamic range and poorer ISO performance reduce landscape detail in shadows/highlights.

Wildlife Photography

  • ZS60: 30x zoom + fast AF + 10fps burst make it a modest wildlife shooter.
  • JZ500: Lacks burst, slow AF, and limited zoom hamper wildlife capture.

Sports Photography

  • ZS60: Continuous AF and fast burst suitable for entry-level sports use.
  • JZ500: Not designed for sports; no continuous shooting or tracking.

Street Photography

  • JZ500: Compact size and stealthy design suit candid shooting.
  • ZS60: Bulkier but still pocketable; touchscreen can be a distraction.

Macro Photography

  • Both cameras have close focus capabilities but lack advanced macro options; neither is specialist-grade.

Night/Astro Photography

  • ZS60: Superior high ISO and longer exposures possible.
  • JZ500: Limited by ISO and noise.

Video

  • Panasonic excels with 4K and advanced video features; FujiFilm is basic.

Travel Photography

  • Both compact enough, but ZS60’s versatility and connectivity edge ahead despite slightly larger size.

Professional Work

  • Neither replaces professional-grade cameras; however, ZS60’s RAW files and advanced controls make it more suitable as a secondary or backup.

Final Thoughts: Who Should Buy Which?

FujiFilm FinePix JZ500 - Choose if:

  • You want a lightweight, straightforward, budget-friendly compact.
  • Your needs are casual snapshots, daylight shooting, and travel where size matters.
  • You prefer ultra-simple controls without manual modes.
  • You are not concerned about video or advanced autofocus.

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 - Choose if:

  • You want a versatile superzoom for wide-ranging subjects from landscapes to distant wildlife.
  • You need fast, reliable autofocus with tracking.
  • You value 4K video, high-res LCD, and EVF.
  • You want manual exposure modes and RAW format for creative control.
  • You appreciate connectivity options for modern workflows.

Summary Table: FujiFilm JZ500 vs Panasonic ZS60

Feature FujiFilm JZ500 Panasonic Lumix ZS60
Launch Year 2010 2016
Sensor 14MP 1/2.3" CCD 18MP 1/2.3” CMOS
Max ISO 1600 (3200 boost) 3200 (6400 boost)
Lens zoom 28-280mm (10x) 24-720mm (30x)
Aperture Range f/3.3-f/5.6 f/3.3-f/6.4
Image Stabilization Sensor-shift Optical
Autofocus Contrast Detection (single) Contrast Detection (multi, face/tracking)
Continuous Shooting None 10fps
Video 720p @24fps Motion JPEG 4K @30fps, 1080p @60fps MPEG-4/AVCHD
Display 2.7" fixed, 230k dots 3" touchscreen, 1040k dots
Viewfinder None Electronic, 1166k dots
Battery Life Unknown ~320 shots
Connectivity None Built-in Wi-Fi, HDMI
Weight 168g 282g
Price (approx) $230 $250

Conclusion

While the FujiFilm FinePix JZ500 remains a charming, ultra-compact camera option for casual photographers wanting simplicity and portability, the Panasonic Lumix ZS60 clearly demonstrates how technology and features evolved between 2010 and 2016.

The ZS60 caters to photographers demanding more creative control, better image and video quality, and technological conveniences like rapid autofocus, longer zoom, and 4K video. Its expanded feature set and solid performance justify the slight size and weight increase and marginal price difference.

If your photography explores diverse styles such as wildlife, sports, landscapes, and casual portraits with flexible post-processing needs, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 is the better investment in terms of versatility and longevity.

I trust this detailed comparison, grounded in hands-on testing and extensive technical evaluation, gives you confidence to choose the camera that fits your photographic ambitions and budget best.

Happy shooting!

Sample Images from Both Cameras

Article and test data by a seasoned camera expert with 15+ years of hands-on experience across the photographic spectrum. This unbiased review reflects thorough testing methodology to bring you trustworthy insights.

FujiFilm JZ500 vs Panasonic ZS60 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for FujiFilm JZ500 and Panasonic ZS60
 FujiFilm FinePix JZ500Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Panasonic
Model type FujiFilm FinePix JZ500 Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60
Also called as FinePix JZ505 Lumix DMC-TZ80
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2010-06-16 2016-01-05
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - Venus Engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 18 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4320 x 3240 4896 x 3672
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Highest enhanced ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 49
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-280mm (10.0x) 24-720mm (30.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.3-5.6 f/3.3-6.4
Macro focusing distance 2cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dot 1,040k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,166k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.46x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Fastest silent shutter speed - 1/16000s
Continuous shutter speed - 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 2.60 m 5.60 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 3840x2160
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 168 gr (0.37 lb) 282 gr (0.62 lb)
Physical dimensions 97 x 57 x 29mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") 112 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 37
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 19.3
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.6
DXO Low light rating not tested 109
Other
Battery life - 320 shots
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-45A -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 3 shots / 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $230 $248