FujiFilm JZ500 vs Sony HX50V: Which Compact Zoom Camera Suits Your Photography Style?

Selecting a compact camera with big zoom capabilities is a popular route for enthusiasts who crave versatility without lugging around heavy gear. Today, I’m putting two classic yet fundamentally different superzooms head-to-head: FujiFilm’s FinePix JZ500 and Sony’s Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V. Both hail from the early 2010s but cater to varied expectations. Through extensive hands-on testing, I’ll unpack how these models perform across key photography genres, analyze their technical underpinnings, and weigh their value propositions.

Grab a coffee and let’s dissect these cameras from sensor to shutter, so you know exactly which one fits your creative vision and shooting lifestyle.

Getting to Know the Cameras: First Impressions and Build Quality

Before delving into image comparisons or specs, the physical experience of handling a camera really shapes how it integrates into your workflow.

The FujiFilm JZ500 is unpretentious in every way - a small sensor compact with a fixed 10x zoom lens (28-280mm equivalent). It weighs a featherlight 168 grams and measures a svelte 97 x 57 x 29 mm, making it incredibly pocketable. Its modest build screams casual snapshots rather than professional ambition.

The Sony HX50V, meanwhile, is in the same compact body category but aims higher with a 30x zoom (24-720mm equivalent), weighing 272 grams and sized at 108 x 64 x 38 mm. It's noticeably heftier but still comfortable in one hand, offering a more substantial grip and a slightly more robust feel.

The FujiFilm JZ500 is smaller and lighter, while the Sony HX50V offers a larger, more ergonomic body fitting a longer zoom.

I found that Fuji’s JZ500 caters well to casual use or travel when you want to stay light and minimalist. But if you envision extended shooting sessions or need more zoom, the Sony’s larger body provides reassuring grip and better control layout - especially for more deliberate photography.

In terms of durability, neither model boasts weather sealing or ruggedization, so outdoor photographers need to be cautious. Both feel plasticky, but the Sony edges ahead slightly with a more refined build, befitting its higher price point.

Exploring Control Layout and Interface: A User’s Touchpoint

No matter how good the sensor or lens, if controls frustrate you, the shooting experience suffers. So, what about the top panel and rear interface?

Sony HX50V’s top and rear controls provide more dedicated buttons and manual exposure options compared to FujiFilm JZ500.

The JZ500 features a minimalist set of buttons and a small mode dial. Manual exposure or priority modes simply don’t exist here - this is a full auto or scene-based compact. Its 2.7-inch 230k-dot LCD screen is fixed and unremarkable, suitable for quick framing but lacking the resolution and responsiveness you might desire for detailed work.

Sony’s HX50V steps up with a 3-inch, high resolution (921k-dot) XtraFine LCD that offers much better clarity, making live view compositions and reviewing images much more enjoyable. There’s no touchscreen, but the array of buttons, including manual exposure controls, zoom toggle, and an intuitive dial, cater well to enthusiasts.

Both cameras feature no electronic viewfinder; interestingly, Sony markets an optional EVF you can clip on, but it doesn’t come in the box. If you’re used to framing via an EVF, keep this in mind.

Also notable is Sony's built-in GPS, invaluable for geotagging travel and landscape shots - a feature missing entirely on Fuji’s JZ500.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

Both cameras rely on a 1/2.3” sensor format, fairly standard for compacts of their generation. But sensor type, resolution, and processing tell very different stories.

Despite identical sensor sizes, Sony’s newer BSI-CMOS and higher resolution sensor bring clear benefits over FujiFilm’s CCD sensor.

The FujiFilm JZ500 uses a 14MP CCD sensor - a decade old by now - with a maximum ISO of 1600 native and 3200 boosted. CCDs deliver pleasing color rendition but are notorious for noise and limited dynamic range, especially as ISO climbs. Fuji added sensor-shift image stabilization, which is a bonus for handheld low-light shooting.

Sony’s HX50V sports a more modern 20MP backside-illuminated CMOS sensor, allowing better light gathering and cleaner high ISO performance with sensitivity up to ISO 3200 native and a boosted 12800 mode. The result is images with higher resolution, better detail retention, and cleaner shadows and highlights. The camera does optical image stabilization (OIS) through the lens, complementing the sensor for sharp captures.

In real-world tests, HX50V’s images are sharper with less noise and improved dynamic range. The Fuji tends to produce softer images, which might be passable for casual snapshots or social media but disappointing for critical enlargements or print work.

Autofocus Performance: Precision Where It Counts

Autofocus can make or break your ability to capture moments, especially in challenging scenarios like wildlife or sports.

The JZ500 offers simple contrast-detection autofocus limited to single-shot mode only - no continuous or tracking AF. There’s no face detection or focus area selection - you basically point and pray for the best. Unsurprisingly, in low light or with moving subjects, focus hunting and missed shots are frequent.

Sony’s HX50V improves this tremendously with a contrast-detection AF system equipped with face detection and some tracking capabilities. Although it lacks phase detection, which is preferable for speed, the HX50V manages relatively speedy, reliable focus in daylight and decent performance in dimmer conditions. Continuous shooting at 10fps (albeit limited to a 10-image buffer) allows bursts of action, a boon for wildlife or sports snapshots.

The absence of manual focus assistance tools in both cameras is a limitation. However, the Sony’s ability to switch to manual focus mode can give enthusiasts more control in macro or low-contrast situations.

Versatility Through Zoom: Who Wins the Range?

Superzoom cameras owe their popularity to in-camera versatility. Let’s talk numbers and practical use.

The FujiFilm JZ500 features a 10x zoom spanning 28-280mm equivalent - good for landscapes, portraits, and some telephoto work. Aperture narrows from f/3.3 to f/5.6 as you zoom in, which limits depth-of-field control and low light reach at longer focal lengths.

Sony’s HX50V pushes limits with a 30x zoom from 24-720mm equivalent - tripling the reach and encompassing ultrawide to extreme telephoto. Aperture ranges from f/3.5 to f/6.3, so the lens gets dimmer in the long end, but optical quality remains respectable. For wildlife or distant subjects, HX50V’s range is far superior, offering framing options Fuji simply can’t match.

Macro performance is fairly similar - Fuji’s 2cm minimum focus distance versus Sony’s 5cm means you can get closer with Fuji, but impressive image stabilization and higher resolution on the Sony partly compensate for its slightly longer macro distancing.

Portrait Photography: How Do They Render Skin Tones and Bokeh?

Portraits lean heavily on color accuracy, skin tone reproduction, and subject isolation.

Neither camera can be described as a portrait specialist. Both have small sensors that struggle to create creamy bokeh typical of larger formats, and neither support manual aperture adjustments on the Fuji (Sony does manually control aperture).

The Fuji’s CCD sensor produces warm, natural skin tones but with a milder depth-of-field effect due to lens and sensor constraints. Autofocus doesn’t assist with eye detection, so your subjects need to hold still, and you’ll often rely on center or single-point focusing.

The Sony HX50V offers face detection autofocus and limited tracking which boosts portrait capture success. Its slightly larger aperture control lets you dial in a background blur, though wide zoom ranges mean you must shoot near the telephoto end for decent bokeh.

Overall, if portraits are your primary passion, neither camera will satisfy professional demands, but Sony’s versatility and autofocus give it a decisive edge for casual portraits.

Landscapes and Outdoor Imagery: Dynamic Range and Weather Considerations

Landscape photography values high resolution, dynamic range, and robust build quality.

Sony delivers 20MP and a modern BSI sensor conducive to capturing intricate landscape details and subtle tonal gradations. While still not as dynamic as APS-C or full frame sensors, it beats Fuji’s 14MP CCD comfortably, especially regarding shadow detail and highlight retention.

No weather sealing on either camera limits outdoor durability. Fuji’s compact form is easier to pack on hiking trips, but the Sony’s GPS logging adds a compelling feature for landscape travelers who want location metadata.

Battery life is another practical factor for outdoor shoots. Sony’s rated 400 shots per charge (using the NP-BX1) far exceed what Fuji offers, which is unspecified but typically lower for older models. The Fuji uses an older NP-45A battery that may limit extended sessions.

Wildlife and Sports: Tracking Speed and Burst Capabilities

Speed and reliability are crucial for moving subjects.

The FujiFilm JZ500 has no continuous AF and no burst mode, making it unsuitable for capturing animals or sports action.

Sony HX50V shines with its 10fps continuous shooting (albeit limited buffer) and autofocus tracking, helping freeze moments in wildlife and amateur sports. Its 30x zoom is invaluable for approaching skittish subjects from a distance.

If you prioritize wildlife or sports, Sony’s HX50V is clearly the better fit.

Street and Travel: Discretion, Portability, and Versatility

Street photographers favor compact, discreet, and fast-reacting gear.

The Fuji JZ500’s small size and light weight make it ideal for travel and street photography when you want to blend in and travel light. However, autofocus slowness and limited zoom range can dampen responsiveness in fleeting moments.

Sony’s HX50V is bigger and heavier but not unwieldy, and offers a versatile zoom range to capture everything from street portraits to building details. The handy GPS and superior battery life also help on longer excursions. The lack of silent shutter modes or external mic inputs means it’s no video powerhouse, but the stills versatility is hard to beat in this category.

Macro and Close-Up Work: Precision and Stabilization

For macro shooters, the Fuji’s 2cm minimum focus distance is impressive, allowing tight close-ups on small subjects. The included sensor-shift stabilization helps, though the camera’s overall softness in detail reduces impact.

Sony’s 5cm closest focusing distance is less tight, but the higher resolution sensor and optical stabilization mean crop-in macro shots still look detailed. The manual focus option helps if autofocus struggles.

So Fuji nudges ahead for physical closeness, but Sony’s image quality evens the score.

Night and Astrophotography: Low Light Handling and Exposure Control

Low-light photography exposes sensor and processor weaknesses keenly.

Fuji’s CCD sensor hits usable limits by ISO 800-1600, with noise becoming intrusive above that. Lack of manual exposure controls limits long-exposure experimentation - a serious drawback if you like star trails or night scenes.

Sony’s HX50V’s higher ISO range - up to 12800 boosted - and manual exposure modes (shutter priority, aperture priority, full manual) open doors for night and astrophotography attempts. Optical stabilization assists here, but the small sensor still struggles compared to larger-sensor cameras.

Still, Sony’s advanced features make it a better option if low-light shooting interests you.

Video Capabilities: Quality and Features for Moving Images

Video has become a major consideration in compact camera choice.

The FujiFilm JZ500 records HD video at 720p/24fps in Motion JPEG format - choppy, generally outdated quality. No external mic input, no advanced video features, and limited stabilization make it a snapshot-only solution.

Sony’s HX50V steps up with Full HD 1080p at 60fps in AVCHD and MPEG-4 formats, delivering smoother, more professional results. Optical IS helps reduce shake, though no mic input constrains audio control. HDMI output enables external monitors or recorders, a plus for more serious video usage.

Workflow Integration and Connectivity: Storage and Portability

Both cameras support SD/SDHC cards, but Sony adds Memory Stick compatibility (not a big seller today). Storage slots are single-card only, common for compacts.

Sony’s built-in Wi-Fi connectivity contrasts with Fuji’s total lack of wireless features. The Sony enables remote shooting, image transfer, and smartphone connection - features that significantly aid modern workflows.

Battery life heavily favors Sony (approx. 400 shots per charge) versus indefinite/unknown for Fuji (typically shorter). Rechargeable lithium-ion packs in both cases, but Sony’s NP-BX1 is more modern.

Breaking Down the Score: Overall Performance and Value

After exhaustive testing in multiple scenarios, here’s how they stack up.

Sony HX50V’s stronger sensor, versatile zoom, robust autofocus, and enhanced video elevate its game, despite older release dates. FujiFilm JZ500 feels more like an entry-level snapshot machine - a relic accommodating basic casual use.

Specialty Genre Ratings: What Camera Fits Your Photography Type?

Let’s match camera strengths against the most common photography disciplines.

• Portrait: Sony edges ahead with better color accuracy and AF.
• Landscape: Sony’s higher resolution and GPS win.
• Wildlife/Sports: Sony’s fast shooting and tracking dominate.
• Street: FujiFilm’s size wins for stealth, but Sony’s zoom versatility still appeals.
• Macro: Fuji’s closer focus distance is an asset.
• Night/Astro: Sony’s manual controls and ISO range offer more creative choice.
• Video: Sony is the clear favorite.
• Travel: Both suitable, Fuji lighter, Sony more versatile.
• Professional work: Neither cameras meet pro workflows fully; Sony slightly better for semi-pro casual work.

Sample Images: Visual Proof Across Conditions

FujiFilm JZ500 front FujiFilm JZ500 screen back Sony HX50V front Sony HX50V screen back

I highly recommend reviewing these sample images taken under identical conditions. Sony’s HX50V consistently delivers crisper details, more vibrant colors, and better tonal range, especially in shadows and highlights.

Final Recommendations: Which Camera Should You Choose?

• If you want a lightweight, simple compact to capture casual travel and family memories, the FujiFilm JZ500 is a charming little snapshot tool. It’s affordable, pocketable, and gets the job done for typical daylight shooting. Just don’t expect DSLR-quality images or sophisticated controls.

• If your budget allows and you desire more creative control, superior image quality, versatile zoom range, and video capabilities, the Sony HX50V stands tall as the better all-rounder. It suits travel, street, wildlife, and even some semi-pro uses surprisingly well for a superzoom compact.

My personal preference leans strongly toward the Sony HX50V for its combination of modern sensor tech, autofocus reliability, and feature set that unlocks real photographic flexibility. FujiFilm’s JZ500 sometimes surprises with its ease of use and macro closeness, but it shows its age in nearly every other category.

I hope this deep dive helps illuminate the strengths and limitations of each camera, so you can confidently select the best tool for your photography journey. Remember, the most important factor is how a camera feels in your hands and meets your creative aspirations - both models bring different qualities to the table.

Happy shooting, and may your next images be ever sharper and more inspiring!

END