FujiFilm S200EXR vs Ricoh CX4
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Announced July 2009
- Also referred to as FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched August 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm S200EXR vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
The following is a extensive analysis of the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Ricoh CX4, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the S200EXR (12MP) and the CX4 (10MP) is pretty well matched but the S200EXR (1/1.6") and CX4 (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S200EXR was unveiled 13 months before the CX4 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the S200EXR scores versus the CX4 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm S200EXR vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR & Ricoh CX4. The full galleries are available at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery & Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Ricoh CX4
| S200EXR | CX4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| CX4 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2010 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 13 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Ricoh CX4
| S200EXR | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm S200EXR has got external measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") and a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) and the Ricoh CX4 has measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Ricoh CX4 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the S200EXR against the CX4.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the S200EXR and CX4 is 54 and 92 respectively.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading through technical specs. The image below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the S200EXR and CX4.
As you have seen, both of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The S200EXR having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the FujiFilm S200EXR will resolve more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged S200EXR is going to be behind in sensor technology.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Ricoh CX4 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix S205EXR | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2010-08-19 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXR | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.20 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 865 gr (1.91 lb) | 205 gr (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-140 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $500 | $211 |