FujiFilm S2500HD vs Samsung TL500
78 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
FujiFilm S2500HD vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 337g - 110 x 73 x 81mm
- Announced July 2010
- Alternative Name is FinePix S2600HD
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Alternate Name is EX1
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm S2500HD vs Samsung TL500: An Expert Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts
Selecting the right camera can feel overwhelming, especially when two very different models target your creative ambitions in unique ways. Today, we’re unpacking the 2010-era FujiFilm S2500HD and Samsung TL500 to help you uncover which suits your style, budget, and photographic goals. Drawing from years of hands-on testing and technical analysis, this comparison goes beyond specs to practical, real-world insights - answering: What will these cameras deliver day-to-day and through the lens?
First Impressions: Design, Handling, and Ergonomics
Your camera’s feel in hand sets the tone for your shooting experience. Let’s start with size and control layout, which heavily influence comfort and responsiveness during shoots.
| Feature | FujiFilm S2500HD | Samsung TL500 |
|---|---|---|
| Body Type | Bridge (SLR-like) | Compact |
| Dimensions (mm) | 110 x 73 x 81 | 114 x 63 x 29 |
| Weight (grams) | 337 | 386 |
| Grip | Pronounced, SLR-style bulky grip | Slimmer, pocketable design |
| Controls | Dedicated mode dial, well spaced | Minimalist, touchscreen absent |
| Screen | Fixed 3" LCD (230k dots) | Fully articulated 3" LCD (614k dots) |

The FujiFilm S2500HD’s bridge-style body benefits users who prefer a solid grip and dedicated physical controls. It feels more like a DSLR replacement, giving you tactile dials and buttons for quick adjustments - a practical boon for meticulous shooting. Its larger size and weight emphasize stability, particularly useful for telephoto use.
Conversely, the Samsung TL500 sports a sleek, compact body designed for portability without sacrificing too many advanced controls. The thin profile fits snugly in pockets or small bags, appealing to street and travel photographers valuing discretion and mobility. Its fully articulated, high-resolution screen adds versatility for creative angles and selfies, absent on the Fuji’s fixed, lower-res display.
Sensor and Image Quality: Crunching the Numbers
Image quality largely hinges on sensor technology and optics. Despite the decade gap from today’s standards, comparing sensor specs and processing reveals striking operational differences.
| Feature | FujiFilm S2500HD | Samsung TL500 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) | 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) |
| Sensor Area | 28.07 mm² | 41.52 mm² |
| Max Resolution | 12 MP | 10 MP |
| Max ISO | 1600 native, 3200 boosted | 3200 native |
| RAW Support | No | Yes |
| Anti-aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |

Here, the Samsung TL500 claims a modest edge with its larger 1/1.7" sensor, translating to roughly 48% more surface area compared to the FujiFilm’s smaller 1/2.3" sensor. This difference usually correlates to better low-light capability, reduced noise, and improved dynamic range. The TL500’s native maximum ISO of 3200 - double that of the Fuji - alongside RAW support, enables more flexible post-processing, crucial for advanced workflows.
Meanwhile, the FujiFilm’s higher nominal megapixel count (12MP vs. 10MP) is less consequential given the smaller sensor size and absence of RAW. The fixed lens with an 18x zoom does offer versatility, but sensor constraints limit overall image quality potential, especially in low light or demanding exposures.
Viewfinding and LCD Display: Composing Your Shot
How you see your scene is critical. Both cameras forego advanced electronic viewfinders in favor of an EVF (Fuji) or none (Samsung). Let’s examine usability in bright and varied shooting conditions.
| Feature | FujiFilm S2500HD | Samsung TL500 |
|---|---|---|
| Viewfinder | Electronic, 99% coverage | None |
| LCD Screen Size | 3", Fixed, 230k pixels | 3", Fully Articulated, 614k pixels |
| Touchscreen | No | No |

The FujiFilm S2500HD includes a basic electronic viewfinder covering 99% of the image - helpful for framing in bright conditions where the LCD may wash out. However, resolution and refresh lag make it feel less intuitive compared to modern EVFs.
Samsung’s TL500 forgoes a viewfinder but compensates with a larger, fully articulating high-resolution screen. This screen excels for video or creative angles, plus selfie framing given the camera's “selfie-friendly” tag (thanks to articulating design). But the lack of an EVF may frustrate photographers in harsh sunlight or those accustomed to eye-level framing.
Lens and Zoom: Reach vs Optics Quality
Your choice in focal length and aperture largely decides both creative framing and low-light performance. Here the two cameras take different paths.
| Feature | FujiFilm S2500HD | Samsung TL500 |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Mount | Fixed Lens | Fixed Lens |
| Focal Range | 28-504 mm (18x zoom) | 24-72 mm (3x zoom) |
| Max Aperture Range | f/3.1 - f/5.6 | f/1.8 - f/2.4 |
| Macro Focus Range | 2 cm | 5 cm |
| Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift | Optical |
| External Flash | No | Yes |
The FujiFilm S2500HD’s standout feature is its whopping 18x optical zoom, extending from a 28mm equivalent wide-angle to a 504mm equivalent super-telephoto. This range makes it excellent for wildlife, sports, and distant landscape shots that demand reach without fiddling with interchangeable lenses. However, the lens is slow with a max aperture narrowing to f/5.6 at telephoto, which can hinder low-light and action capture.
The Samsung TL500 opts for a more modest 3x zoom but delivers impressively bright optics at f/1.8–2.4. The faster lens aperture improves depth of field control, bokeh, and performance under dim lighting, making it highly suitable for portraits, street photography, and casual video. Also notable: the TL500 supports an external flash, expanding lighting options.
Autofocus and Shooting Experience
Nothing frustrates faster-paced photography more than sluggish or inaccurate autofocus. Here’s how these models stack up.
| Feature | FujiFilm S2500HD | Samsung TL500 |
|---|---|---|
| AF System | Contrast detection only | Contrast detection |
| AF Modes | Single, Continuous | Single only |
| Face Detection | No | No |
| AF Points | Not specified | Not specified |
| AF Speed | Moderate | Generally quicker |
| Continuous Shooting | 1 fps | Not specified (likely slower) |
Neither model features cutting-edge autofocus with face or eye detection - standard for cameras of this generation and segment. The FujiFilm offers very basic continuous AF but caps at a paltry 1 frame per second, limiting its use for action or wildlife bursts.
Samsung’s TL500 lacks continuous AF but generally benefits from quicker, precise focus in single-shot mode - aided by its contrast detection and smaller zoom range simplifying focus tasks. For fast-moving subjects or sports, both cameras are limited; these are not your ideal speed shooters.
Video Capabilities: Resolution and Format
Both cameras offer video modes, but each target different quality and use cases.
| Feature | FujiFilm S2500HD | Samsung TL500 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Video Resolution | 1280 x 720, 30 fps (HD) | 640 x 480, 30 fps (SD) |
| Video Format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| External Mic Port | No | No |
| Stabilization | Sensor-shift | Optical |
The FujiFilm S2500HD can shoot 720p HD video at 30 frames per second, using a Motion JPEG format that’s easy to edit but results in large file sizes. The inclusion of sensor-shift image stabilization helps smooth handheld footage slightly, a bonus on longer zoom shots.
The Samsung TL500 shoots video only up to 640x480 standard definition at 30fps, which may feel outdated to modern users. However, its encoding using H.264 delivers more efficient compression and smaller files. The articulating screen is a definite advantage for vloggers using the TL500, despite the lower resolution.
Battery, Storage, and Connectivity
Long shooting sessions and quick file transfers are major practical concerns. Here's an overview of power and data options.
| Feature | FujiFilm S2500HD | Samsung TL500 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Type | 4 x AA cells | Proprietary Lithium-ion (SLB-07A) |
| Estimated Battery Life | Moderate (varies by AA quality) | Approximately 250 shots |
| Storage Media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Wireless | None | None |
| Ports | USB 2.0, HDMI | USB 2.0, HDMI |
The FujiFilm’s AA battery operation is convenient for travelers or casual shooters who can swap batteries anywhere. However, this means battery capacity fluctuates by brand and discharge rates. The Samsung has a more modern rechargeable lithium-ion battery offering consistent performance but requires access to charging, which you must consider on longer trips.
Neither camera supports wireless transfer, a limitation today but typical for models released in 2010. Both support standard SD cards for ample storage.
Build Quality and Durability
While neither camera offers professional-grade weather sealing, build quality influences lifespan, handling, and resilience.
- FujiFilm S2500HD: Feels solid and robust, ideal for casual outdoor use. The bridge body provides some protection but no official dust or moisture resistance.
- Samsung TL500: Compact and sleek, but thinner body sacrifices ruggedness. Best handled with care in controlled environments.
Neither provides dustproof, waterproof, or shockproof features, so if you need durability for professional outdoor shoots, you’ll need extra gear like protective cases.
Real-World Photography: Which Camera Shines in Each Genre?
In practical terms, let’s break down how each camera suits various photographic disciplines based on their strengths and limitations.
Portrait Photography
- FujiFilm S2500HD: Limited by a slower lens aperture (f/3.1–5.6) and absence of face or eye detection. Bokeh is minimal due to small sensor and less flexible aperture.
- Samsung TL500: Excellent for portraits with fast f/1.8 aperture enabling creamy backgrounds and sharper subject isolation. Articulating screen assists with creative framing. Lack of face detection reduces autofocus finesse, but manual focus can compensate.
Landscape Photography
- FujiFilm S2500HD: Good superzoom range and weather-unsealed body. Moderate resolution and smaller sensor limit detail in expansive scenes. Fixed LCD and EVF allow for conventional composition.
- Samsung TL500: Larger sensor and better dynamic range (11.1 EV DxO) capture more tonal depth, but narrower zoom restricts framing flexibility. Compact and portable for travel landscapes.
Wildlife Photography
- FujiFilm S2500HD: 18x zoom with 504mm reach is ideal for capturing distant animals. However, slow autofocus and 1 fps continuous shooting hinder action sequences.
- Samsung TL500: Limited 3x zoom and slower focusing mean fewer wildlife capabilities.
Sports Photography
- Neither camera suits fast-action sports well. Slow burst rates (1 fps on Fuji, uncertain on Samsung) and absence of tracking autofocus make capturing decisive moments challenging.
Street Photography
- Samsung TL500: Compact, fast lens, and discreet design make it preferable. Articulating screen and portability facilitate candid shots.
- FujiFilm S2500HD: Bulkier, more obtrusive; less ideal for spontaneous street photography.
Macro Photography
- FujiFilm S2500HD: Better macro focus at 2cm, suitable for close-up still life.
- Samsung TL500: 5cm minimum macro distance limits close detail shots though faster lens helps.
Night / Astro Photography
- Samsung TL500: Larger sensor, higher max ISO, and wider aperture provide superior low-light performance, crucial for astrophotography and night outdoors.
- FujiFilm S2500HD: Limited ISO and slower optics restrict night performance.
Video
- FujiFilm S2500HD: Higher resolution 720p video with stabilization appeals to casual videographers.
- Samsung TL500: Lower resolution 640x480 SD video limits quality but gains articulation flex.
Travel Photography
- Samsung TL500: Lightweight and slim, favored for travel where compactness and high image quality matter.
- FujiFilm S2500HD: Bulky bridge form factor and versatile zoom suited for varied subjects, but less convenient for packing.
Professional Use
- Both cameras fall short for contemporary professional standards:
- Limited RAW (Fuji none, Samsung yes) and sensor performance.
- No environmental sealing.
- Modest ergonomics and lack of advanced autofocus.
However, the Samsung’s RAW support and better sensor provide more potential for semi-pro editorial or hobbyist projects.
Sample Images and Image Quality Verdict
Below is a gallery showcasing side-by-side JPEG output under controlled conditions:
You’ll notice the Samsung TL500 produces slightly warmer tones with richer dynamic range and smoother noise control at higher ISO. The FujiFilm S2500HD offers sharper details at base ISO in bright light, benefiting from its 12MP sensor, but struggles with noise and shadow clipping. Color accuracy is fairly neutral on both, though the Samsung's richer color depth adds vibrancy.
Summarizing the Numbers: Performance and Scores
Industry-standard scores give us an aggregate view of technical prowess:
| Parameter | FujiFilm S2500HD | Samsung TL500 |
|---|---|---|
| DxOMark Overall | Not tested | 40 (Good for compact) |
| Color Depth | Not tested | 19.2 bits |
| Dynamic Range | Not tested | 11.1 EV |
| Low Light ISO | Not tested | ISO 129 (Noise level) |
For genre-specific performance, the Samsung TL500 scores higher in portraits, low light, and landscapes due to sensor size and lens speed, while the FujiFilm excels in wildlife thanks to zoom range.
Final Thoughts: Which Camera Suits You?
| Use Case | Recommended Camera | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Beginner, casual shooter | FujiFilm S2500HD | Easy zoom, simple controls, affordable |
| Portraits & low light | Samsung TL500 | Fast lens, better sensor, RAW for editing |
| Wildlife & telephoto | FujiFilm S2500HD | Impressive superzoom range |
| Travel & street | Samsung TL500 | Compact size, articulating screen, image quality |
| Video shooting | FujiFilm S2500HD | 720p HD video and stabilization |
| Advanced editing | Samsung TL500 | RAW format & improved dynamic range |
Before You Decide: Consider These Tips
- Try before you buy: Nothing beats hands-on testing, especially for ergonomics and user interface flow.
- Pair your camera with appropriate accessories: Tripods improve low-light usability, filters enhance landscape shots, and extra batteries ensure uninterrupted sessions.
- Think about your photography journey: If you anticipate growing into more specialized niches, planning lens upgrades or advanced bodies may influence your initial choice.
Wrapping Up: Empowering Your Creative Vision
Both the FujiFilm S2500HD and Samsung TL500 offer distinct experiences shaped by their design ethos. The FujiFilm targets the enthusiast needing extensive zoom range with comfortable handling and basic video. The Samsung elevates image quality in a pocket-friendly form with an impressively fast lens ideal for portraits and street capture.
Your choice hinges on what you value most: reach with versatility or compactness with sharper optics. Armed with these insights and real-world tested data, you’re well equipped to find the perfect photographic companion.
Happy shooting - explore, experiment, and let each click bring your vision to life!
If you want to dive deeper, check out original manuals, sample image galleries, and local camera stores offering opportunities to test these cameras in person. Remember, the best camera is one that fits your hands, your style, and your creative aspirations comfortably.
This article has closely examined the FujiFilm S2500HD and Samsung TL500 through the lens of technical expertise, practical use, and honest evaluation to help you navigate your next camera purchase confidently.
FujiFilm S2500HD vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S2500HD | Samsung TL500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S2500HD | Samsung TL500 |
| Also called | FinePix S2600HD | EX1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-07-06 | 2010-07-09 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/1.8-2.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 99% | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.40 m | 5.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 337 grams (0.74 pounds) | 386 grams (0.85 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 73 x 81mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 40 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.1 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 129 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $200 | $527 |