Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ25W
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
70 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Alternative Name is WB5000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ25W, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and HZ25W (12MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe WG-4 was unveiled 3 years after the HZ25W which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the WG-4 matches up versus the HZ25W for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung HZ25W. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery and Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Samsung HZ25W
| WG-4 | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | July 2010 | Newer by 44 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Ricoh WG-4
| HZ25W | WG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung HZ25W
| WG-4 | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-4 comes with external measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ25W has proportions of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") having a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ25W in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the WG-4 vs the HZ25W.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 and HZ25W is 90 and 70 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specs. The picture below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 and HZ25W.
All in all, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 to show more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The newer WG-4 provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung HZ25W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung HZ25W |
| Also referred to as | - | WB5000 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2014-02-05 | 2010-07-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 5.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 428g (0.94 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $330 | $350 |