Comparing the FujiFilm FinePix S4000 vs Fujifilm FinePix S8500: Expert Analysis for Informed Photographers

In this comparative review, we analyze two bridge-type superzoom cameras from Fujifilm’s earlier line-up: the FinePix S4000 (2011) and the FinePix S8500 (2013). Both target enthusiasts seeking versatile focal ranges with fixed lenses, compact DSLR-style ergonomics, and relatively affordable price points. Our evaluation dissects core photographic disciplines, mechanical and electronic design aspects, image quality metrics, and practical usability considerations for photographers demanding thorough knowledge before investing.

The intent is to provide an authoritative, hands-on insight drawn from extensive real-world testing methodologies and technical analysis to clarify when each device excels or shows limiting characteristics relative to its sibling. Let’s begin with their physical characteristics and continue through sensor technology, autofocus, performance in diverse photographic genres, video capabilities, and overall reliability.

Physical Dimensions and Handling: Ergonomics Matter in Long Shoots

The two models share the tried-and-true “SLR-like” bridge camera form factor but differ subtly in size, weight, and ergonomic details that impact comfort and stability across prolonged shooting sessions.

• Fujifilm S4000 measures 118 x 81 x 100 mm and weighs 540g, powered by 4 AA batteries. Its slightly more compact footprint makes it easier for extended hand-held use with reduced arm fatigue.
• Fujifilm S8500 ups dimensions to 123 x 87 x 116 mm, weighing 670g with the same battery configuration, reflecting the more complex zoom lens and robust construction.

In testing, the S8500 conveys a slightly more solid “pro-ish” feel, notably due to its larger lens barrel and grip area - conducive to wildlife or telephoto-intensive shooting that demands steadiness. Conversely, S4000’s lighter build benefits street or travel photography where portability and minimal burden are key.

Handling reassurance is context-dependent: users preferring a more compact, lightweight rig will favor the S4000; those requiring stability at extreme focal lengths lean toward the S8500.

Control Layout and Interface: Usability Insights for Fast-Paced Workflows

Touch control sophistication remains limited, but each camera’s button and dial placement impacts operational fluidity.

• The S4000 runs a simpler control scheme with fewer customizable buttons, leaning heavily on mode dials and basic exposure toggles, reflecting design trends of early-2010s bridge cameras.
• The S8500 introduces a more functional top layout, including enhanced shutter speed range (up to 1/7000s vs 1/2000s on the S4000) and higher continuous shooting rates (10 fps compared to 1 fps), aligning with faster action capture demands.

Neither offer touchscreen support, which by the release years was becoming more common on competing models, slightly impairing quick menu navigation. However, both provide live view and an electronic viewfinder (EVF):

• The S8500 features a higher resolution (200 pixels) EVF, contributing to more accurate framing and manual focus assistance over the less resolved S4000 finder.
• Rear LCD screens are identical in size (3”) and resolution (460k dots), both fixed and non-touch, confirmed in later sections.

For photographers prioritizing fast, accessible manual controls or burst photography, the S8500’s improved layout clearly supports more diverse shooting scenarios.

Imaging Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of Performance

Both cameras utilize 1/2.3-inch sensors - typical for superzooms but inherently limited vs larger APS-C or full-frame sensors in dynamic range and noise control.

• S4000 employs a 14MP CCD sensor. CCD technology, while adept at color rendition in its peak era, typically suffers in high-ISO noise and dynamic range compared to CMOS.
• S8500 shifts to a 16MP back-illuminated CMOS sensor (BSI). BSI designs offer improved light-gathering efficiency, lower noise, and better ISO latitude versus CCDs - confirmed in real-world low-light shooting.

Native ISO ranges differ as well: S4000 maxes at 1600 (boosted to 6400 with noise penalties), while S8500 extends natively to ISO 12800. Though high ISO usability remains limited on small sensors, S8500’s BSI-CMOS design reliably produces cleaner images at higher sensitivities.

Maximum resolutions stand at 4288x3216 for S4000 and 4608x3456 for S8500, equating to roughly 14MP and 16MP respectively, a slight edge for printing or cropping needs on the latter.

In solid lighting conditions, color accuracy and sharpness are commendable on both, but the S8500 provides finer detail retrieval and reduced chromatic aberrations, aided by more advanced image stabilization (optical versus sensor-shift on the S4000) and updated lens coatings.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Critical for Action and Wildlife Photography

Superzoom cameras appeal to wildlife and sports photography enthusiasts needing reliable autofocus (AF) and fast burst capabilities, though expectations should remain tempered by hardware constraints.

• S4000 features contrast-detect AF with face detection and tracking modes. Continuous AF and live view focus work well in ideal conditions but struggle in low contrast or rapidly changing scenes. Burst shooting caps at 1 fps, limiting sports or wildlife tracking.
• S8500 bizarrely omits autofocus continuous and face detection functions, relying on single AF with contrast detection only. While unusual for a newer model, it compensates with a significant leap in continuous frame rates (up to 10 fps), useful for capturing fast sequences if focus is locked in advance.

Neither camera supports phase-detection AF - a technology that improves speed and accuracy in mid-range and professional cameras - limiting performance particularly in challenging light or for fast-moving subjects.

In wildlife or sports shooting tests, the S8500 delivers superior frame rates for tracking action bursts but requires careful pre-focusing to avoid missed shots due to slower AF response. The S4000’s face and tracking AF facilitate easier shooting of moving human subjects but are hampered by slow shot-to-shot cadence.

Detailed Image Stabilization and Lens Range: Zoom Reach vs Optical Disturbances

This category defines the core usability and creative potential for these cameras, especially due to wide zoom ranges intended to replace multiple lenses.

• S4000 sports a 24-720mm equivalent (30x optical zoom) F3.1-5.9 lens with sensor-shift stabilization. While sensor-shift stabilization can reduce camera shake in certain orientations, its effectiveness diminishes at long focal lengths.
• S8500 significantly extends the zoom range to 24-1104 mm equivalent (46x optical zoom) with an F2.9-6.5 aperture lens, paired with optical image stabilization embedded in the lens assembly. This configuration generally offers superior shake correction, especially at extended telephoto ends.

The trade-off with extreme zooms is invariably image softness, lens distortion, and slower apertures impairing autofocus and depth of field control. S8500’s wider maximum aperture at the short end (f/2.9 vs f/3.1) benefits indoor or low-light wide-angle shots slightly.

Macro performance minimally differs: S4000 offers a superb close focusing distance of 2cm; the S8500 lacks a specified macro focus range but physically permits tight framing at its widest angles.

Displays, Viewfinders, and Interface Usability

Rear display and EVF resolution heavily influence composition ease and exposure accuracy when shooting handheld or outdoors.

• Both cameras feature 3” LCD panels with 460k dots; however, neither is articulating or touch-capable, limiting framing flexibility and menu navigation.
• The S8500’s higher resolution EVF (200 pixels) enhances manual focus confirmation. The S4000 provides an EVF with unspecified resolution, likely lower, contributing to a less precise preview experience.

These fixed screens restrict comfortable overhead or ground-level shooting, and shadowed use under bright sunlight challenges live view visibility. Neither offers touchscreen responsiveness, which is especially inconvenient when adjusting ISO or AF settings quickly.

Practical Shooting Scenarios: Performance Across Genres

Portrait Photography

• S4000 benefits from face detection and eye detection AF, delivering good skin tone accuracy courtesy of CCD sensors’ pleasing color science but limited bokeh control due to small sensor size and narrow apertures.
• S8500 lacks face or eye-detection AF but features better resolution for detail capture. Its more extended zoom enables standing portraits with increased subject-background separation but bokeh quality remains constrained.

Landscape Photography

• Both cameras feature limited dynamic range inherent to 1/2.3” sensors; however, S8500’s BSI-CMOS slightly edges the S4000 in highlight retention and shadow detail.
• Weather sealing is absent on both models, making them suboptimal for adverse conditions.
• Higher resolution and wider lens range of the S8500 are advantageous for detail-rich scenes.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

• S8500’s massive zoom reach and impressive 10 fps burst rate make it the stronger choice for distant wildlife or fast sports, despite its weaker AF system.
• S4000’s face tracking AF favors casual sports or family action shots at closer range but is limited by 1 fps shooting.

Street Photography

• S4000’s lighter size, simpler design, and lower weight lend itself better to street shooting where discretion and portability count.
• The S8500 is bulkier and heavier, less suited to long street shooting hours.

Macro Photography

• S4000’s 2cm focusing surpasses S8500 for macro enthusiasts seeking tight close-ups.
• Both lack advanced focus stacking or focus bracketing options.

Night and Astro Photography

• S8500’s expanded ISO range (up to 12800) and BSI CMOS sensor provide cleaner night images and greater flexibility with exposure settings.
• Neither supports long-exposure noise reduction features or bulb modes, limiting astrophotography potential.

Video Capabilities

• S4000 records at 1280x720 (HD) at 30 fps; S8500 steps up to 1920x1080 Full HD at 60 fps, with additional slow-motion modes at lower resolutions.
• Both lack microphone/headphone jacks, limiting audio capture quality; video codecs are Motion JPEG, restricting file compression efficiency.
• Optical stabilization on S8500 enables steadier video; the S4000 uses sensor-shift stabilization, less effective in video.

Travel Photography

• S4000’s lower weight and streamlined zoom range allows quicker transition between subjects with less fatigue.
• S8500 offers more creative freedom through extreme zoom reach and better image quality but at the cost of bulk.

Professional Work and Workflow Integration

• Neither supports RAW capture, constraining post-processing flexibility.
• File storage remains SD/SDHC on the S4000 and adds SDXC compatibility on S8500, future-proofing storage somewhat.
• Both have basic USB 2.0 and HDMI ports for file transfer and external viewing, no wireless connectivity or GPS.

Battery Life and Storage: Sustaining Extended Shoots

Both cameras leverage 4 AA batteries - a practical choice if no proprietary batteries are at hand, facilitating quick swaps and off-the-grid shooting support. Tests note roughly 300 shots per charge life on S4000; official data is missing for S8500, but increased electronics and faster shooting likely reduce longevity. Rechargeable NiMH AAs recommended for sustainability.

Both support a single SD card slot, with S8500’s compatibility extended to SDXC providing capacity benefits over S4000’s SD/SDHC limitation.

Price-to-Performance Ratio: What You Get for Your Money

• S4000 was priced in the $279 range at launch, appealing as an affordable superszoom bridge camera.
• S8500, with enhanced zoom, higher resolution sensor, and improved video options, commands roughly $500, nearly double the price.

Our testing suggests the S8500 justifies its premium primarily for telephoto reach, video quality, and burst shooting capabilities. For budget-conscious buyers focused on travel or casual portraits, S4000 remains a compelling, lightweight option.

Overall Performance Ratings

After extensive controlled and real-world testing across multiple scenarios, these summary performance scores assist objective comparison.

Key takeaways:

• S8500 ranks higher in versatility, image quality, and video features.
• S4000 scores better on portability and user friendliness for everyday casual use.
• Both are limited by their sensor sizes, autofocus technologies, and lack of RAW.

Genre-Specific Strengths and Weaknesses

We drilled down to photography-type scoring to highlight nuanced suitability.

• Portraits: S4000’s autofocus tracking is advantageous.
• Landscape: Slight edge to S8500 for detail and range.
• Wildlife/Sports: S8500 dominates due to zoom and burst.
• Street: S4000 preferred for size and discreetness.
• Macro: Marginal win for S4000’s close focus.
• Night/Astro: S8500 better due to sensor tech.
• Video: Clear win for S8500 with Full HD 60p and stabilization.
• Travel: S4000 for compactness; S8500 for power users.
• Professional Work: Neither fully satisfies pros’ needs.

Sample Image Gallery: Comparative Output Under Real Conditions

FujiFilm S4000 front FujiFilm S4000 screen back Fujifilm S8500 front Fujifilm S8500 screen back

Sample crops show the S8500’s improved fine detail at telephoto lengths and superior noise control in dim environments, whereas the S4000 exhibits slightly warmer colors and smoother skin tones in portrait captures.

Conclusion: Which Camera Fits Your Photography Style?

For photographers evaluating these Fujifilm superzoom bridge cameras today, consider:

• Choose the FujiFilm FinePix S4000 if:

  • You require a lightweight, affordable camera with a decent zoom.
  • You prioritize face detection autofocus and ease of use.
  • Macro and casual travel photography with minimal bulk suit your style.
  • You shoot stills at moderate focal lengths without rapid burst needs.

• Choose the Fujifilm FinePix S8500 if:

  • Extended zoom reach up to 1104mm is critical (birding, distant wildlife).
  • Higher resolution images and superior video capabilities matter.
  • You demand higher burst rates for action or sports photography.
  • You understand and accept the bulk and battery trade-offs.
  • Night and astro photography pursuits benefit from enhanced sensor.

Both cameras are legacy models lacking high-end user features like full RAW support, advanced autofocus wells, or weather sealing, but within their class and time frames, they remain viable options for enthusiasts seeking the convenience of ultra-zoom fixed-lens designs.

This detailed, experience-driven comparison equips you with an in-depth understanding to align your camera choice with your photographic intent and workflow requirements. Choosing between the S4000 and S8500 hinges on prioritizing zoom reach and shoot speed versus portability and autofocus sophistication.

For continued updates and hands-on reviews on similar cameras and equipment, follow our comprehensive testing archives and join our expert photography forums.