Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FP1
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
95 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FP1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Revealed August 2017
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Announced January 2010
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FP1 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic FP1, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and FP1 (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and FP1 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M10 III was revealed 7 years after the FP1 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FP1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-M10 III scores versus the FP1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FP1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Panasonic FP1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Panasonic FP1
E-M10 III | FP1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2017 | January 2010 | More modern by 94 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP1 over the Olympus E-M10 III
FP1 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic FP1
E-M10 III | FP1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FP1 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 III comes with outside dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Panasonic FP1 has proportions of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic FP1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 III compared to the FP1.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and FP1 is 80 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FP1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading through technical specs. The picture here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and FP1.
As you have seen, both the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 III with its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-M10 III will give you more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 III will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FP1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FP1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2017-08-31 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.6 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 4.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410g (0.90 pounds) | 151g (0.33 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $650 | $153 |