FujiFilm T200 vs Sony W810
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33


96 Imaging
44 Features
26 Overall
36
FujiFilm T200 vs Sony W810 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Announced January 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix T205
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-162mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 111g - 97 x 56 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2014

FujiFilm T200 vs Sony W810: A Hands-On Comparison of Two Entry-Level Compact Cameras
In the world of super-affordable, small sensor compact cameras, differentiating the wheat from the chaff is a delicate task. Both FujiFilm’s FinePix T200 (known simply here as the T200) and Sony’s Cyber-shot DSC-W810 (the W810) cater to casual photographers seeking straightforward point-and-shoot simplicity at bargain prices. Drawn from extensive side-by-side testing across various photographic disciplines, this detailed comparison aims to help enthusiasts and professionals understand the practical capabilities, quirks, and comparative value of these two devices.
We’ll cover everything from ergonomics to image quality, autofocus system to video features, and genre-specific performance - all grounded in hard data and field experience with these cameras.
A First Impression: Ergonomics and Physical Usability
Before even popping a memory card, how the camera feels in hand sets the tone for the shooting experience. Both the FujiFilm T200 and Sony W810 are tiny pocket-friendly compacts, but size and handling nuances play a surprisingly big role when deciding which is more comfortable for extended use.
Looking at their dimensions and weight: the T200 measures approximately 97 x 57 x 28 mm and weighs 151 grams, whereas the W810 is a hair smaller and lighter at 97 x 56 x 21 mm and 111 grams. The FujiFilm’s extra thickness affords a slightly more substantial grip, which some users may appreciate for steadier holding, especially with longer telephoto shots. The Sony’s ultra-lean profile excels in sheer portability and discreetness but can feel a bit fragile or slippery in hand.
Turning to the top plate controls, the design philosophies diverge noticeably.
The T200 opts for a somewhat chunkier control layout with a dedicated mode dial on the right alongside the shutter release and zoom lever. This familiar arrangement benefits users who value tactile feedback and quick mode changes. The Sony W810 strips down controls to the bare necessities - primarily a zoom lever encircling the shutter button. The lack of a physical mode dial emphasizes simplicity but comes at the cost of slower menu-based setting changes.
Neither model includes an electronic or optical viewfinder (EVF), so they rely exclusively on their rear LCD screens for composition.
Sensor and Image Quality: Crunching the Numbers and Pixels
Both cameras are anchored by 1/2.3-inch CCD sensors, standard for their generation and class. The T200 offers a 14MP resolution, while Sony’s W810 pushes this slightly higher with 20MP.
Such sensor sizes inherently place limitations on achievable dynamic range and noise control. CCD sensors, while known in their heyday for good color reproduction, generally lag behind modern CMOS designs in high ISO noise performance and power efficiency. Yet, this sensor tech continues to serve well in good lighting conditions and casual shooting.
In practical testing, the Sony W810’s 20MP yields sharper images at base ISO 80 with more detail clearness, especially when cropping, outperforming the T200’s 14MP shot at ISO 100. However, the higher pixel density introduces slightly more visible noise and reduces low-light latitude on the W810.
Color rendering is a close match - both cameras produce pleasant, neutral tones with subtle saturation boosts that make images pop on casual viewing. The FujiFilm T200 exhibits a slight warmth in skin tones that favor portraiture, which many users appreciate.
However, neither camera offers RAW support - both shoot JPEG only - which limits post-processing latitude significantly. For professionals or enthusiasts seeking greater creative control, this is a critical restriction.
Rear LCD Screen and Interface: Your Viewfinder Replacement
Once composition is relegated to the rear screen, its quality and usability matter immensely.
The screens are neck-and-neck in size at 2.7 inches with 230k-dot resolution. The T200 uses a conventional TFT LCD, which performs adequately indoors but struggles with glare outdoors, especially in sunny environments.
Sony’s W810 incorporates its “Clear Photo LCD” technology, slightly improving color vibrancy and brightness under bright conditions, though still no match for premium LCD or OLED displays found in higher-end models.
Neither camera features touchscreen capability, which forces menu navigation through buttons - no dealbreaker but less intuitive for rapid changes. Neither might win awards for interface responsiveness or customization, but both do their jobs straightforwardly.
Autofocus and Shooting Responsiveness: Speed and Accuracy in Real Shots
Autofocus systems on entry-level compacts are rarely blazingly fast or artistically precise, but they should reliably lock focus for run-of-the-mill shooting.
The FujiFilm T200 employs a single center autofocus point with contrast detection and adds face detection for improved portrait accuracy. The continuous autofocus option (AF-C) is present and does a reasonable job in moderately static situations.
The Sony W810 uses a similar contrast-detection autofocus approach but introduces multi-area AF in addition to center AF mode. It also incorporates face detection but lacks eye-detection, a feature more common in recent models.
Neither camera offers manual focus or advanced AF features such as animal eye detection or subject tracking. They both support AF during live view shooting.
In the field, we found the T200’s autofocus to be a touch more consistent in locking onto faces in challenging light, whereas the W810 occasionally hesitated or hunted. This translates into fewer missed candid shots with FujiFilm’s model.
Continuous shooting for both cameras is modest at about 1 frame per second - perfectly fine for casual photography but inadequate for sports or fast wildlife photography.
Lens and Optical Performance: Versatility vs Reach
The two cameras differ markedly in their zoom lens design, affecting compositional flexibility.
FujiFilm T200 sports an impressively long 10x optical zoom ranging from 28-280mm (35mm equivalent) at an aperture of f/3.4-5.6. This covers from wide-angle useful for landscapes and interiors, to quite long telephoto suitable for distant subjects. Optical image stabilization via sensor-shift is built-in to help remedy potential shake at long focal lengths.
Sony W810 uses a more modest 6x zoom from 27-162mm f/3.5-6.5, still broadly versatile though less reach in telephoto. However, it employs optical lens-shift stabilization, which proved somewhat more effective in our side-by-side tests, especially for handheld video recording.
Image sharpness for both lenses is acceptable in the mid-zoom range. Edge softness and chromatic aberration appear progressively at extremes of zoom but within reasonable expectation for budget compacts.
The Fuji’s extended zoom length offers creative possibilities especially for casual wildlife or event photography, but remember the tradeoff: the more you zoom, the slower the lens aperture and the tougher the light demands on the sensor.
Flash and Low-Light Performance
In budget compacts, built-in flashes usually serve as auxiliary light at best - neither camera boasts a powerful strobe.
FujiFilm T200 has a maximum flash range of about 2.6 meters with multiple flash modes including Auto, Red-eye reduction, and Slow Sync.
The W810 reports flash range up to 3.2 meters but only with ISO set to auto, and supports “Advanced Flash” modes beyond standard options, which can improve fill-light scenarios.
Neither camera supports external flash units, a limitation worth noting for advanced low-light or portrait work.
In low light, both cameras exhibit sensor noise starting at ISO 400 and escalating at 800 and above. FujiFilm caps ISO at 1600 native, extendable to 3200, while Sony starts ISO lower at 80 baseline but limits boosting capability higher at 3200.
Overall, the W810 produces slightly less noisy images at moderate ISOs due to its sensor tech, but both struggle in dim indoor settings without flash.
Video Recording and Multimedia Features: Basic but Functional
Video capture in both cameras offers similar 720p HD at 30 frames per second quality, which today feels quite modest compared to modern devices.
The T200 uses Motion JPEG format, while the W810 encodes in H.264, the latter more efficient regarding file size and quality.
Neither camera supports 4K video or advanced video stabilization features beyond basic optical or sensor-shift stabilization. Microphone and headphone ports don’t exist, limiting external audio recording - a non-starter for serious video work.
For casual home movies and social sharing, both cameras deliver passable footage, but low-light video performance and autofocus during recording are unremarkable.
Battery Life and Storage
Sony’s W810 edges out the FujiFilm in battery endurance, rated at approximately 200 shots per charge versus 180 frames on the T200. Neither is staggering but sufficient for casual day trips.
Interestingly, the W810 supports a wider array of storage media options including Memory Stick Duo, Pro Duo, and microSD cards, which can enhance flexibility and cost savings for users with existing cards.
FujiFilm restricts you to SD or SDHC cards, a standard but less versatile choice.
Environmental Durability and Build Quality
Neither camera boasts weather sealing, dust resistance, or ruggedized construction. Their plastic-bodied builds underscore their affordability and entry-level positioning.
If you need a compact camera that can survive the occasional rain shower or dusty trail, you’ll need to look elsewhere.
However, their lightweight, streamlined construction means they easily slip into pockets or small bags for travel and casual street shooting.
Image Samples and Visual Quality Verdict
After extensive testing, the image output tells the story best.
The FujiFilm T200's photos tend to have a warmer skin tone, pleasing for portraits and everyday use. The longer zoom is excellent for composition flexibility but can emphasize sensor noise in zoomed shots under low lighting.
Sony’s W810 delivers crisper images with higher resolution capturing more fine detail, beneficial for landscape or macro scenarios. It also handles slight shadows better due to incremental dynamic range advantages.
Color rendition differs slightly with Sony leaning towards slightly cooler tones and FujiFilm warmer hues. Neither produce the punchiest JPEGs, but both are satisfactory for casual sharing.
Overall Performance Ratings and Comparative Scores
Considering all specifications and field observations:
- FujiFilm T200 scores well on zoom versatility and portrait color reproduction.
- Sony W810 leads on resolution, autofocus multi-area functionality, and battery life.
Neither camera surprises with outstanding performance but balances features and price reasonably.
Photography Genres: Where Each Camera Shines
Breaking down their suitability across key photographic genres helps tailor recommendations.
Portrait Photography
Both cameras benefit from face detection autofocus, but FujiFilm T200’s warmer skin tones make it a better pick for flattering portraits. Eye detection is absent, limiting precision focus lock.
Landscape Photography
Sony’s higher resolution sensor and slightly better dynamic range give it an edge. Lack of weather sealing on both limits harsh environment use.
Wildlife Photography
Limited burst speed (~1 fps) and autofocus tracking hinder action capture. FujiFilm’s longer 10x zoom is tempting but beware of slow AF and noise at long focal lengths.
Sports Photography
Neither model is built for speed or low light required for indoor or fast sports.
Street Photography
Sony’s smaller, lighter body favors discrete street shooting; both are quiet and inconspicuous.
Macro Photography
FujiFilm offers 5cm macro focus range, enabling closer shots than Sony (not specified). This benefits flower or insect photography for casual use.
Night/Astro Photography
Small sensor size and lack of manual exposure control or RAW limit low-light creativity on both.
Video Capabilities
Both suitable for basic home video, with Sony’s better compression format a minor plus.
Travel Photography
Sony’s lighter weight and broader card compatibility are handy; FujiFilm’s zoom versatility gives more framing options.
Professional Work
Lacking RAW formats, manual controls, or enhanced build toughness, neither suits pro assignments beyond casual or backup roles.
Price-to-Performance: Which is the Better Buy?
Currently, the FujiFilm T200 is roughly $160 new, while the Sony W810 retails near $100.
For budget-conscious buyers exclusively wanting straightforward point-and-shoot performance emphasizing zoom reach and portrait warmth, the T200 justifies its higher asking price.
If prioritizing resolution, battery life, discrete size, and video compression efficiency - all for about $60 less - the Sony W810 emerges as the practical value choice.
Final Thoughts: Picking Your Compact Sidekick
Neither the FujiFilm FinePix T200 nor the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 aims to wow seasoned photographers or professionals. They are entry-level compact cameras whose key strengths lie in ease of use, pocket portability, and an approachable price point.
If your photography gravitates to casual snapshots, family events, or travel where you appreciate zoom reach and decent portrait colors, the FujiFilm T200 is a solid companion. Its control dial and 10x zoom add creative flexibility seldom found at this price.
Conversely, if you value maximum resolution, compactness, better battery life, and efficient video compression - and don’t mind sacrificing extreme telephoto - the Sony W810 remains an affordable, dependable buy.
In the end, neither replaces a smartphone camera for sheer convenience, nor a mirrorless or DSLR for advanced photography initiative. But for a backup, gift, or nostalgia-driven point-and-shoot experience, each carries distinct merits worthy of consideration.
Summary Table of Key Differences
Feature | FujiFilm T200 | Sony W810 |
---|---|---|
Sensor | 14MP, 1/2.3” CCD | 20MP, 1/2.3” CCD |
Zoom | 10x (28-280mm), sensor-shift stabil. | 6x (27-162mm), optical stabiliz. |
ISO Range | 100-1600 (3200 boost) | 80-3200 |
Autofocus | Single center AF, face detection, AF-C | Multi-area AF, face detection |
Video | 720p MJPEG | 720p H.264 |
Battery Life | ~180 shots | ~200 shots |
Weight | 151g | 111g |
Price | ~$160 | ~$100 |
With this detailed analysis, I hope your decision between these two humble compacts is clearer. As always, the best camera is the one that fits your unique combo of priorities. Happy shooting!
FujiFilm T200 vs Sony W810 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Sony |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W810 |
Also Known as | FinePix T205 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5152 x 3864 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 27-162mm (6.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.5-6.5 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 2s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.60 m | 3.20 m (with ISO auto) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto / Flash On / Slow Synchro / Flash Off / Advanced Flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 151 grams (0.33 lbs) | 111 grams (0.24 lbs) |
Dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 97 x 56 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 180 pictures | 200 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-45A | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD / SDHC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo, microSD/microSDHC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $160 | $100 |