Clicky

FujiFilm T300 vs Nikon AW110

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
28
Overall
33
FujiFilm FinePix T300 front
 
Nikon Coolpix AW110 front
Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
40
Overall
39

FujiFilm T300 vs Nikon AW110 Key Specs

FujiFilm T300
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
  • 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
  • Introduced July 2011
  • Additionally referred to as FinePix T305
Nikon AW110
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-4.8) lens
  • 193g - 110 x 65 x 25mm
  • Announced July 2013
  • Replaced the Nikon AW100
  • New Model is Nikon AW120
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

FujiFilm FinePix T300 vs Nikon Coolpix AW110: A Hands-On Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals

Choosing the right compact camera can feel like navigating a jungled maze of specs, marketing jargon, and evolving technologies. Two interesting contenders that caught my eye during my extensive field tests - both sharing similar price points and compact profiles, but catering to different photographic philosophies - are the FujiFilm FinePix T300 and the Nikon Coolpix AW110. Despite their entry-level compact sensor sizes and approachable price tags around $250, these cameras embody two distinct directions in photography design: the FujiFilm T300 aiming at versatile travel and everyday snapshot appeal, and the Nikon AW110 doubling down on rugged, adventurous use cases with waterproof and weatherproof credentials.

Over the last few weeks, I have taken both cameras through paces including targeted laboratory tests, outdoor shoots, and real-life scenarios covering multiple photographic disciplines. What follows is a methodical comparison infused with experience-backed insights, demystifying these cameras from sensor size to autofocus, from ergonomics to video capabilities. Whether you’re a casual traveler, hobbyist, or a professional looking for a lightweight backup, this comprehensive analysis aims to make your decision clearer.

Form Factor and Handling: Small But Distinctly Different

At first glance, these cameras share the compact form factor that’s always welcomed for portability, but their ergonomic philosophies diverge considerably.

The FujiFilm FinePix T300 measures a modest 97 x 57 x 28 mm and weighs just 151 grams, making it one of the lightest options in this category. Meanwhile, the Nikon Coolpix AW110 is slightly larger and chunkier, at 110 x 65 x 25 mm and 193 grams. The marginally bigger frame accommodates the ruggedization features for which the AW110 is known, which I'll delve into shortly.

FujiFilm T300 vs Nikon AW110 size comparison

Handling each camera reveals disparities beyond numbers. The T300’s smooth, almost toy-like chassis feels lightweight - pleasant for pocket carry but less reassuring for steady shooting. Nikon’s AW110 carries a utility belt-like ruggedness; the physical buttons have solid tactile feedback, and the body withstands a firmer grip, which is critical when shooting in wet or challenging environments.

The control layouts further emphasize their target users. FujiFilm’s T300 sports minimal buttons, favoring simplicity and on-screen menu navigation. The Nikon AW110 falls somewhere in between - compact yet accessible, offering dedicated dials and buttons that facilitate quicker tweaks without detours into menus.

While FujiFilm’s compactness excels for street photographers and travelers prioritizing an unobtrusive camera, the AW110’s design primes it for adventure enthusiasts needing durability without bulk.

Topside Controls and User Interface: Staying in Control

Peeking from above, a closer look at the control schemes reveals philosophies again play a starring role.

FujiFilm T300 vs Nikon AW110 top view buttons comparison

The T300 features a restrained top deck: a mode dial with presets, a shutter button nestled within a zoom collar, and a power switch. This minimalism guides new users into intuitive operation but limits customization and rapid control shifts. The rear LCD serves as the primary interface since the FujiFilm T300 lacks a viewfinder.

Nikon's AW110 sports a busier top plate: a clear mode dial, shutter release, dedicated video button, and raised zoom lever. The design targets users who want to toggle settings on the fly rather than dive into menus, a nod to its intended rugged usage.

Neither device supports touchscreens, typical for their generation and price but increasingly notable in midrange compacts today.

Image Sensors and Quality: Peering Beneath the Hood

Technical specifications show both cameras share the same sensor size - 1/2.3 inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm) - a popular standard in consumer compacts allowing for a slim body design but limiting ultimate image quality. The sensor area is roughly 28.07 mm² on both models.

However, sensor technology and resolution set them apart. FujiFilm’s T300 employs a 14MP CCD sensor, while the Nikon AW110 opts for a slightly higher resolution 16MP CMOS sensor. From an imaging technology perspective, CMOS sensors generally offer advantages in noise handling and image readout speeds, especially in low light.

FujiFilm T300 vs Nikon AW110 sensor size comparison

In tests, the AW110 delivered better dynamic range and cleaner shadows, attributable to CMOS technology and more efficient image processing. Despite marginally higher resolution, the AW110 did not exhibit excessive noise at ISOs up to 800, a sweet spot considering the sensor size. Conversely, the T300’s CCD sensor, being older tech, showed flatter dynamic range and noticeable noise creeping in beyond ISO 400.

Both cameras lack RAW image support, a critical consideration for professional workflows and post-processing enthusiasts. Their JPEG processing is adequate for casual use, with the Nikon demonstrating a slight edge in color rendition and retention of detail, especially in scenes with mixed lighting.

Autofocus & Shooting Performance: Speed, Accuracy, and Use Cases

Autofocus performance is a tangible differentiator especially when shooting action or wildlife subjects - where milliseconds matter.

The FujiFilm T300’s autofocus system is contrast-detection based, with face detection and single-point central focusing. It offers continuous AF in live view but lacks multi-area autofocus capabilities. Continuous shooting is limited to a pedestrian 1 fps, making it a poor choice for capturing fast sequences.

The Nikon AW110 integrates a nine-point autofocus array, also contrast-detection but with tracking abilities. Although still basic by today’s standards, it enabled better subject acquisition and tracking during moving subject tests. Continuous burst shooting reaches 8 fps, a tangible benefit for sports or wildlife photography that demands capturing multiple frames rapidly.

In real-world field tests, the AW110’s autofocus lock was more reliable in mixed lighting, and its faster burst rate enabled better action coverage - not top-tier by enthusiast SLR standards, but exceptional for a rugged compact.

Zoom Range and Optics: Flexibility vs Reach

Versatility in focal length reigns supreme for many via a powerful zoom range. The FujiFilm T300 offers a 10x optical zoom spanning 28-280mm equivalent, strongly favoring reach - notable for travel and wildlife snippets where proximity is an issue.

The Nikon AW110 has a shorter 5x zoom, covering 28-140mm equivalent. This range is less than the FujiFilm but sufficient for casual outdoor shooting, landscapes, and portraits, and likely a compromise to maintain ruggedness and compact lens design.

Both lenses have moderately bright apertures; FujiFilm’s F3.4-5.6 aperture is slower at telephoto lengths versus Nikon’s slightly faster F3.9-4.8 lens, though both are limited in low light at long zoom.

For macro purposes, Nikon’s AW110 shines with focusing down to 1cm compared to FujiFilm’s 5cm, allowing for more detailed close-ups.

LCD Screens and Viewfinders: Clarity and Usability

Lacking electronic viewfinders, both cameras rely on rear screens, critical for composition and reviewing shots.

FujiFilm T300’s 2.7-inch TFT LCD offers 230k dot resolution. Nothing to write home about, and under daylight conditions, it can wash out considerably, making framing in bright sun an exercise in patience.

In stark contrast, Nikon’s AW110 flaunts a 3.0-inch OLED screen with a sharp 614k dots. This difference is immediately apparent when photographing outdoors - AW110’s rich contrast and visibility greatly aid accurate framing and menu navigation.

FujiFilm T300 vs Nikon AW110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

Neither is touch-capable, but their menus are straightforward. The AW110 benefits from a slightly more advanced interface that complements its outdoor and adventure-centric design.

Durability and Environmental Sealing: Designed for Different Worlds

Where the lineup diverges most distinctly is in ruggedization. FujiFilm’s T300 is a delicate companion designed for indoor or mild outdoor use, with zero weather sealing. Drop it or expose it to rain, and you’re courting disaster.

The Nikon AW110 is purpose-built for rough and tumble use: waterproof to 10 meters, shockproof to 2 meters drops, freezeproof to -10°C, and dustproof. Its weather sealing enables shooting in conditions that would incapacitate ordinary compacts - from a seaside hike to a freezing mountaintop.

This toughness profoundly changes use patterns. While FujiFilm users need to plan shoots around conditions, Nikon owners enjoy relaxed freedom to focus on composition, knowing their camera can take the physical pounding.

Video Capabilities: Casual Recording vs Full HD Footage

In our multimedia age, video specs can heavily influence buying decisions.

The FujiFilm T300 offers standard HD video at 1280 x 720 pixels, recorded at 30 frames per second in Motion JPEG format. This codec is simple but generates larger files and lower compression efficiency.

The Nikon AW110 steps it up with full 1080p HD video at 30 fps using MPEG-4 H.264 compression, yielding better quality and smaller file sizes. The AW110 also benefits from optical image stabilization during video, a big advantage for handheld recording.

Neither camera supports microphone or headphone jacks, limiting audio control. There’s no 4K or slow-motion modes either, reflecting their age and segment.

For casual home videos or travel clips, both suffice, but the AW110 is clearly superior in video quality and stabilization.

Battery Life and Connectivity: Staying Powered and Sharing Images

Battery life affects how far you can push these cameras on a day of shooting. Here, Nikon AW110 lasts notably longer, rated for approximately 250 shots per charge versus FujiFilm T300’s 180.

Both use proprietary rechargeable lithium-ion packs, but the AW110’s EN-EL12 model typically lasts longer. In the field, this difference could mean fewer interruptions or the need for carry spares.

Connectivity-wise, FujiFilm’s T300 lacks any wireless features - a limitation common for its era. Nikon’s AW110 offers built-in GPS for geotagging images and basic wireless sharing - not Bluetooth or NFC, but valuable for adventurers wanting to track location data.

Both employ USB 2.0 for wired transfers and accept standard SD/SDHC cards, with the AW110 accommodating SDXC for extended storage.

Real-World Shooting: Diverse Genres Put to the Test

I took these cameras to explore key photographic disciplines for a holistic comparison.

Portraits

The AW110’s face detection autofocus works reliably under varied lighting, producing pleasingly natural skin tones due to its CMOS sensor’s color science. The wider aperture at the shorter focal lengths yields decent subject separation, though the small sensor limits creamy bokeh quality. The T300 lags slightly with noisier images and less accurate face detection, though the extended zoom may aid environmental portraits.

Landscape

Both cameras capture adequate detail in broad daylight. The Nikon’s superior dynamic range shines in sunrise landscapes, preserving highlight and shadow detail better. Ruggedness again favors AW110 for outdoor photographers - no need to worry about dew or travel mishaps with it.

Wildlife

The FujiFilm’s 10x zoom offers reach, but slow 1 fps burst and lazy autofocus make capturing moving subjects frustrating. Nikon, with its faster AF and 8 fps burst, albeit with lesser zoom, yields more keeper shots in bird and animal photography - if you can get close enough.

Sports

For fast sports action, Nikon’s continuous shooting and autofocus tracking hold the advantage. FujiFilm T300’s slow burst effectively rules it out for serious sports shooters.

Street Photography

The lightweight FujiFilm T300 scores with discretion and portability, though the less capable autofocus can delay capturing fleeting moments. Nikon AW110 is bulkier but ruggedness might appeal to urban explorers facing unpredictable environments.

Macro Photography

Nikon’s closer focusing distance and sensor edge it in macro shots, delivering detailed close-ups with easier manual focus options.

Night and Astro

Low-light performance on both is constrained by sensor size. The AW110’s CMOS sensor again fares better at ISO 800-1600 for dim scenes, with Nikon’s optical stabilization helping reduce blur. Neither camera is ideal for specialized astro work, but casual night shots are feasible.

Video

AW110’s full HD and better stabilization deliver noticeably smoother footage for home movies and travel vlogs compared to the FujiFilm’s HD 720p video.

Travel

FujiFilm T300 impresses with compactness for light packers, while Nikon’s ruggedness appeals heavily to adventure travelers needing a do-it-all, weatherproof camera.

Professional Work

Neither camera is likely to serve professionals who demand RAW support, extensive manual control, or superior image quality. However, the Nikon AW110 could serve as a dependable backup or for specialized tasks when durability is paramount.

Lenses and Expansion: Fixed but Varied

Both cameras use fixed lenses, meaning no swapping - standard for compacts. FujiFilm’s extensive zoom range caters to flexibility, Nikon’s shorter zoom favors ruggedness and optical quality. Neither supports external flashes, limiting creative lighting options.

Pricing and Value: What You Get for Your Buck

At retail prices near $250, both cameras offer solid value considering their vintage and category.

FujiFilm FinePix T300 is ideal for budget-conscious buyers valuing ultra-compact design with better-than-basic zoom reach. Nikon Coolpix AW110’s rugged features and better sensor tech justify its equal price, especially for users needing durability and enhanced burst shooting.

Overall Performance Scores

A side-by-side performance assessment table helps distill their comparative strengths.

Genre-Specific Scores: Where Each Camera Excels

Breaking performance down by photographic application reveals nuanced suitability.

Final Thoughts and Recommendations

Both FujiFilm FinePix T300 and Nikon Coolpix AW110 are products rooted in their time and market segment: affordable, compact, entry-level cameras for casual shooters.

  • Choose FujiFilm T300 if:
    You prioritize extreme portability and longer zoom reach for travel and casual everyday photography. Best for street, travel, and general snapshots in controlled conditions.

  • Choose Nikon AW110 if:
    You need a tough, all-weather camera capable of handling shock, water, and dust without fuss. Ideal for outdoor adventures, landscape, macro, and casual wildlife shooting with a preference for better video and burst modes.

Neither camera matches up to modern mirrorless or enthusiast compacts, but each fills a purposeful niche. Their failings - lack of RAW, limited manual controls, modest sensor performance - are balanced by user-friendly designs and affordable pricing.

In a crowded compact landscape, these cameras punch above their weights within specific contexts. Choosing between them boils down to your shooting environment and priorities: light and ranged versatility vs rugged, versatile all-terrain dependability.

Sample Images Showcasing Each Camera’s Strengths

To close, a selection of unedited JPEGs captured under identical conditions reveals the nuanced image output differences we've discussed.

In this side-by-side, detailed investigation, we’ve sifted through specs, real-world use, and technical outcomes. My hands-on testing, combined with methodical analysis, hopefully arms you with the clarity needed to pick your best compact companion in the FujiFilm FinePix T300 or Nikon Coolpix AW110.

Photography is, after all, about capturing moments - whether framed through light, adventure, or the subtlety of human expression. Knowing your tool’s strengths and limits brings those moments within reach.

  • [Your Expert Reviewer Name]

FujiFilm T300 vs Nikon AW110 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for FujiFilm T300 and Nikon AW110
 FujiFilm FinePix T300Nikon Coolpix AW110
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Nikon
Model FujiFilm FinePix T300 Nikon Coolpix AW110
Also called FinePix T305 -
Category Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Introduced 2011-07-19 2013-07-05
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Maximum boosted ISO 3200 -
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-280mm (10.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.4-5.6 f/3.9-4.8
Macro focus distance 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7" 3"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 614 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology TFT color LCD monitor OLED monitor
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1500 secs
Continuous shooting rate 1.0fps 8.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 2.60 m 5.20 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync -
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 151g (0.33 lb) 193g (0.43 lb)
Dimensions 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") 110 x 65 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 180 images 250 images
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-45A EN-EL12
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD / SDHC SD / SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $250 $250