FujiFilm T300 vs Sony HX50V
94 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
89 Imaging
44 Features
57 Overall
49
FujiFilm T300 vs Sony HX50V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Launched July 2011
- Alternate Name is FinePix T305
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5 - 6.3) lens
- 272g - 108 x 64 x 38mm
- Released April 2013
- Previous Model is Sony HX30V
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera FujiFilm FinePix T300 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V: The Definitive Small-Sensor Compact Showdown
In the ever-expanding world of compact cameras, the FujiFilm FinePix T300 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V represent two distinct takes on what a small sensor compact camera can deliver. Both promise portability and zoom versatility, but they target subtly different photographers with their unique feature sets and performance nuances. Having spent extensive testing hours with both - evaluating their hardware, image quality, autofocus behavior, and overall usability - I’m excited to bring you a thorough, no-nonsense comparison that helps you pick the right tool for your specific photographic needs.
Let’s dig into the details, starting with the fundamentals: physical design and ergonomics.
Compact Powerhouses: Size, Handling, and Controls
At first glance, these cameras live up to their "compact" designation, but they do so in markedly different ways. The FujiFilm T300 is what you'd expect from a classic bridge compact with modest zoom - lightweight and pocketable. The Sony HX50V, on the other hand, pushes the boundaries of compactness given its expansive 30x zoom lens and feature-rich design.

The T300 measures a trim 97 x 57 x 28 mm and weighs a mere 151 grams - perfect for slipping into a jacket pocket or purse. Its fixed lens zooms 10x (28-280 mm equivalent), which covers most everyday focal lengths but lacks reach for serious telephoto needs.
Conversely, the Sony HX50V's bulkier 108 x 64 x 38 mm frame and 272 grams reflect its ambitious 30x zoom (24-720 mm equivalent). Though nearly twice as heavy, it still fits comfortably in a large jacket pocket or medium-sized bag and offers more telephoto reach than most compacts in this class.
When it comes to controls and handling, the FujiFilm T300 opts for simplicity with minimal external buttons, exposing the casual user to a straightforward shooting experience. The lack of manual exposure modes or external dials reveals its beginner-friendly intent.
Meanwhile, the Sony HX50V is more versatile: it includes physical control rings, dedicated buttons for manual focus, shutter priority, aperture priority, and full manual exposure. For photographers who want to take more creative control, the HX50V’s ergonomics provide a much-improved interface - although prolonged use reveals some button placements that could be finicky, especially when juggling zoom and exposure in stressful moments.
If you prize simplicity and a no-fuss grab-and-go design, the T300 impresses with sheer portability. But if you want greater operational control wrapped in still-compact dimensions, the HX50V edges ahead.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Core of Photography
Both cameras employ 1/2.3-inch sensors - standard territory for superzoom compacts - but their sensor technologies and resolution diverge notably.
The FujiFilm T300 sports a 14-megapixel CCD sensor, an older technology known for pleasing color rendition but generally trailing behind CMOS sensors in dynamic range and low-light performance. CCD sensors also tend to draw more power.
Sony’s HX50V uses a 20.4-megapixel back-illuminated CMOS (BSI-CMOS) sensor, providing better light-gathering efficiency and improved noise control at higher ISOs. This sensor choice marks a clear technological advantage, especially in challenging lighting and for capturing fine detail.
In practical use, the T300 delivers respectable image quality in bright daylight, with pleasant colors and adequate sharpness for casual sharing and prints up to A4. Its limited maximum ISO of 1600 and lack of raw capture constrain post-processing potential and low-light usability. Grain becomes noticeable at ISO 800, making it less suited for dim interiors or twilight scenes.
The HX50V’s higher resolution enables larger prints and more cropping flexibility. Coupled with a max native ISO of 3200 (extendable up to ISO 12800), the Sony handles shadow detail and dim conditions much better, retaining usable detail deep into higher ISO settings. While noise does increase at extreme ISOs, the BSI-CMOS sensor’s signal-to-noise ratio delivers cleaner images overall.
FujiFilm’s CCD sensor also implements an anti-aliasing filter to suppress moiré at the cost of slight resolution softness; Sony’s HX50V keeps its filter but benefits from its sensor’s inherently better detail balance.
Overall, the Sony's sensor design and resolution translate to superior image quality across diverse situations, reinforcing the HX50V as a more versatile shooter.
LCDs and Viewfinders: Seeing Your Frame
Composing and reviewing images relies heavily on the camera’s LCD and/or viewfinder quality. Both models forego tilting or articulating screens, settling on fixed LCDs that differ significantly in size and resolution.
The FujiFilm T300 features a modest 2.7-inch TFT LCD with 230k-dot resolution, which feels underwhelming, especially when zooming in to check sharpness or framing tight shots. Outdoor visibility is average, with noticeable reflections and reduced contrast in bright sunlight - a common trait of older lower-res LCDs.
Conversely, Sony's HX50V boasts a 3.0-inch “XtraFine” LCD with a crisp 921k-dot resolution. This higher pixel density yields sharper previews and more precise autofocus point visualization, greatly aiding composition and review. The screen also performs better under daylight, thanks to improved brightness and anti-reflection coatings.
The HX50V offers an optional electronic viewfinder (EVF) accessory, which the T300 completely lacks. While this EVF is relatively small, it’s a valuable aid for shooting in direct sun or when you prefer a traditional eye-level interface. The absence of any viewfinder on the T300 limits compositional options, again pointing to its casual target audience.
For situational awareness and critical focusing, the Sony HX50V’s superior display options clearly elevate the user experience.
Autofocus and Speed: Locking Focus When It Counts
Autofocus systems can make or break a camera’s real-world usability, particularly for fast-moving subjects like wildlife or sports.
The FujiFilm T300 uses contrast-detection AF with a single center point and face detection. It offers continuous AF and tracking, although the latter is rudimentary and occasionally fumbling when subjects move unpredictably. The lack of multiple focus points limits compositional freedom when tracking off-center subjects.
The Sony HX50V incorporates an advanced contrast-detection AF with multiple focus points and face detection, combined with an enhanced tracking algorithm. Although it lacks phase-detection AF (uncommon in compacts of this era), in practical use, the HX50V focuses faster, locks on more reliably, and tracks moving subjects with more confidence.
In burst shooting, the T300 lingers at a sluggish 1 fps continuous shooting rate - adequate for snapshots but ineffective for action photography. The HX50V ramps up to a much more impressive 10 fps burst mode, allowing you to capture fleeting moments in sports or wildlife. The buffer depth is limited, but sufficient for short bursts.
For photographers who need to capture movement - street candid shots, sports, even family events - the Sony HX50V’s autofocus performance and continuous shooting capabilities strongly outmatch the FujiFilm.
Zoom Range and Macro: Exploring Distance and Detail
Zoom versatility is a cornerstone of compact camera value, and here the cameras split dramatically.
The FujiFilm T300 offers a 10x optical zoom from 28mm wide-angle to 280mm telephoto equivalent. It covers the basics well, handling landscapes, portraits, and mid-level telephoto reach, but it won’t get you into the realm of distant wildlife or sports.
The Sony HX50V pushes the envelope with a massive 30x optical zoom spanning 24-720mm equivalent. That 24mm ultrawide is excellent for landscapes or cramped indoor shooting, while the 720mm extends into telephoto territory usually reserved for DSLR super-tele lenses. Of course, image quality at max zoom tapers, but for most casual to enthusiast photographers, this range is a remarkable all-in-one solution.
Both cameras have a macro focus distance of 5 cm, which delivers reasonable close-up capabilities. However, the Sony’s multifunctional lens and better focusing system make it slightly more flexible for macro shots, and its superior image stabilization helps reduce blur at close range.
Stability and Flash: Shooting Steady and Lit Scenes
Image stabilization is critical in small sensor superzooms - especially at long focal lengths where handshake amplifies.
The FujiFilm T300 employs sensor-shift image stabilization, which is effective for its zoom range but limited relative to modern optical systems in more advanced cameras.
Sony’s HX50V uses optical image stabilization (SteadyShot), which tends to offer stronger compensation, especially useful at extreme telephoto lengths. The difference is noticeable in real use: handheld shots at 700mm equivalent on the HX50V are more consistently usable, while the T300’s stabilization struggles beyond 200mm.
Both models pack built-in flashes, but the HX50V’s covers a longer range (up to 5.6 meters versus 2.6 meters on the T300) and supports more flexible flash modes - including slow sync and rear curtain sync - allowing for creative lighting control, especially in low light or night scenarios.
The T300’s flash modes are basic, with no external flash capability, limiting its utility for more serious low-light or creative shooting. The Sony’s external flash support adds a layer of expandability for enthusiasts wanting more lighting options.
Video Capabilities: Moving Beyond Stills
In today’s multimedia environment, video performance is critical to many users.
The FujiFilm T300 tops out at 720p HD video at 30 fps, recorded in Motion JPEG format - a relatively basic codec that results in bulky files and limits editing flexibility. Video controls are minimal, and there is no microphone input or image stabilization optimized for video.
Sony’s HX50V offers full HD 1080p video at 60 fps (progressive), recorded in efficient MPEG-4 and AVCHD formats. This translates into smoother motion capture and better overall video quality. Although no microphone or headphone jacks are present, the video stabilization is commendably effective, resulting in steady footage even at telephoto zoom. Users can also control exposure while filming, which is a substantial advantage.
For casual video, the T300 suffices, but serious vloggers or multimedia enthusiasts will find the HX50V much more capable.
Connectivity, Battery Life, and Storage
When taking a camera into the field, connectivity and power endurance matter.
The FujiFilm T300 offers no wireless connectivity - zero Wi-Fi or GPS support. Battery life is modest at approximately 180 shots per charge, which means carrying spares is a must for extended trips. It uses the NP-45A rechargeable lithium-ion pack and stores images on SD/SDHC cards.
Sony enhances convenience with built-in GPS for geotagging and wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi), enabling image sharing and remote camera control via smartphones. Battery life doubles the FujiFilm, rated at around 400 shots per charge using the NP-BX1 battery, making it substantially more travel-friendly.
In terms of storage, the HX50V supports a wider range - SD/SDHC/SDXC as well as Memory Stick Pro Duo formats - offering flexibility for users with existing Sony media.
Durability and Build Quality
Neither camera is weather-sealed or ruggedized, so cautious handling around dust and moisture is advisable.
The FujiFilm T300’s plastic body feels lightweight but less robust than the Sony HX50V’s slightly heftier and more solid construction. Neither is suitable as a primary outdoor/pro adventure camera, but the HX50V’s comfortable grip and build instill slightly more confidence for frequent travel and varied environments.
Real-World Performance: Sample Images and Use Cases
Nothing beats seeing how these cameras perform in the field. I put both to the test across diverse genres:
-
Portraits: The T300’s color science delivers pleasant skin tones, but shallow depth of field is limited by its small sensor and slower aperture. The HX50V’s higher resolution and superior exposure modes yield sharper, truer portraits, with better eye detection AF that results in more reliable focus on faces.
-
Landscape: The wider 24mm focal length on the Sony makes framing expansive vistas easier. Its higher resolution and dynamic range preserve fine textures and tonal gradations absent on the FujiFilm. The T300’s 28mm still works but feels more confined.
-
Wildlife and Sports: Neither built for pro sports shooting, but the Sony’s 10 fps burst and 30x zoom outpace the T300’s 1 fps and 10x zoom significantly - capturing more decisive action moments.
-
Street Photography: The FujiFilm’s smaller size aids discretion and portability for street shooters preferring a low profile. The HX50V’s longer zoom encourages distance shooting but at the cost of larger size.
-
Macro and Night: The T300’s sensor struggles in low light with visible noise; the HX50V performs better. Macro shots are better detailed and sharper on Sony’s camera thanks to better stabilization and focusing controls.
-
Video: Sharpness, stabilization, and frame rate advantages place the HX50V well ahead for capturing smooth, shareable footage.
Performance Scores and Value Assessment
Our expert panel rated these cameras on a broad spectrum of factors:
Sony HX50V leads significantly in image quality, versatility, autofocus speed, and video functions. FujiFilm T300 scored modestly, reflecting its more entry-level approach.
Looking at genre-specific strengths:
- Portrait and Landscape: HX50V preferred
- Wildlife and Sports: HX50V dominates
- Street: T300 favored for portability
- Video & Night Photography: HX50V clear winner
- Macro: Slight edge to HX50V for precision
- Travel: HX50V for feature set, T300 for minimal carry
- Professional Work: Neither suited for heavy pro assignment
Who Should Buy Which? Clear Recommendations
Choose the FujiFilm FinePix T300 if you:
- Want a straightforward, ultra-compact point-and-shoot for casual family snapshots
- Value lightness and easy pocketability over zoom reach or manual control
- Shoot mostly in bright daylight without need for advanced video
- Prioritize affordability (typically lower price point near $250)
- Prefer a simple interface with minimal buttons
Opt for the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V if you:
- Demand extensive zoom reach (30x) for wildlife or sports casual shooting
- Need manual exposure modes and fast burst shooting capabilities
- Are serious about video recording with 1080p at 60fps
- Desire built-in GPS and wireless for travel and sharing
- Require a higher resolution sensor and better low-light performance
- Don’t mind the extra bulk and higher price (~$440)
- Value a rich feature set in a still-compact form factor
Final Thoughts: Finding Your Compact Camera Match
While the FujiFilm FinePix T300 appeals as a lightweight, easy-to-use compact for basic photography, the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V impresses with its technology-forward feature set and superior image capabilities within the compact superzoom niche.
I’ve personally found the HX50V far more adept at fulfilling enthusiast needs across multiple photographic disciplines, especially when zoom reach, manual control, and video features matter - a fact confirmed by extended field tests and image analysis.
Yet, the T300’s no-frills approach means it won’t overwhelm novice users or those looking for a grab-and-go backup that doesn’t break the bank.
Choosing between these cameras boils down to your priorities: portability and simplicity vs. versatility and performance. Either way, understanding their strengths and shortcomings equips you to make an informed, confident purchase.
Feel free to reach out with questions or comments - I’m here as someone who’s handled thousands of cameras to help you find your perfect photographic partner.
This detailed comparison draws on hours of hands-on testing, optical bench measurements, and real-world shooting scenarios to provide a reliable, expert resource on these two compact cameras’ practical value.
Appendix: Key Specifications Summary
| Specification | FujiFilm FinePix T300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | 1/2.3" CCD, 14MP | 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS, 20.4MP |
| Lens Zoom Range | 28-280 mm (10x) | 24-720 mm (30x) |
| Max Aperture | f/3.4–5.6 | f/3.5–6.3 |
| Continuous Shooting | 1 fps | 10 fps |
| Max ISO | 1600 (boost 3200) | 3200 (boost 12800) |
| Video Resolution | 1280x720 (30 fps) | 1920x1080 (60 fps) |
| Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift | Optical SteadyShot |
| Display Size & Resolution | 2.7" 230k dots | 3.0" 921k dots |
| Viewfinder | None | Optional EVF |
| Battery Life (shots) | ~180 | ~400 |
| Weight | 151g | 272g |
| Wireless Connectivity | None | Wi-Fi + GPS |
| Price (approximate) | $250 | $440 |
With all these facets considered, your choice between the FujiFilm FinePix T300 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V will reflect the balance you seek between everyday convenience and technical capability. Happy shooting!
FujiFilm T300 vs Sony HX50V Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix T300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix T300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix T305 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2013-04-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 2920 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.5 - 6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | XtraFine LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 5.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 151 grams (0.33 lbs) | 272 grams (0.60 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 108 x 64 x 38mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 shots | 400 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-45A | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $250 | $439 |