FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M575
95 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
95 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M575 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.9-4.7) lens
- 158g - 98 x 59 x 20mm
- Released July 2010
- Other Name is FinePix Z808EXR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
- Launched January 2010
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M575 Overview
Lets look more closely at the FujiFilm Z800EXR and Kodak M575, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the Z800EXR (12MP) and the M575 (14MP) is fairly well matched but the Z800EXR (1/2") and M575 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Z800EXR was unveiled 7 months after the M575 and they are of a similar generation. The two cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the Z800EXR scores against the M575 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M575 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR and Kodak EasyShare M575. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm Z800EXR Gallery and Kodak M575 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm Z800EXR over the Kodak M575
Z800EXR | M575 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2010 | January 2010 | Newer by 7 months | |
Display size | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the FujiFilm Z800EXR
M575 | Z800EXR |
---|
Common features in the FujiFilm Z800EXR and Kodak M575
Z800EXR | M575 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M575 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm Z800EXR has external dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Kodak M575 has dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm Z800EXR and Kodak M575 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the Z800EXR versus the M575.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Z800EXR and M575 is 95 and 95 respectively.
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M575 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions only by checking specifications. The picture here will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z800EXR and M575.
Plainly, both of those cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Z800EXR having a larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Kodak M575 will resolve extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more recent Z800EXR is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M575 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
FujiFilm Z800EXR vs Kodak M575 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Kodak EasyShare M575 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Kodak |
Model | FujiFilm FinePix Z800EXR | Kodak EasyShare M575 |
Otherwise known as | FinePix Z808EXR | - |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2010-07-21 | 2010-01-05 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXR | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1000 |
Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-4.7 | - |
Macro focus range | 9cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/1400s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.90 m | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) | 152 gr (0.34 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-45A | KLIC-7006 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $200 | $139 |