Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-PL8
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-PL8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Introduced August 2017
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL7
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL9
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-PL8 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus E-PL8, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras and both of them are designed by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the E-PL8 (16MP) is fairly similar and they come with the exact same sensor measurements (Four Thirds).
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M10 III was brought out 12 months after the E-PL8 so they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-M10 III scores versus the E-PL8 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-PL8 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Olympus PEN E-PL8. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Olympus E-PL8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus E-PL8
E-M10 III | E-PL8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2017 | September 2016 | More modern by 12 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 1037k | Crisper display (+3k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Olympus E-M10 III
E-PL8 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus E-PL8
E-M10 III | E-PL8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-PL8 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 III has outer measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL8 has specifications of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus E-PL8 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M10 III versus the E-PL8.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and E-PL8 is 80 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-PL8 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and E-PL8.
As you can see, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical resolution so you should expect similar quality of pictures however you might want to consider the production date of the products into consideration. The newer E-M10 III will have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-PL8 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus E-PL8 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus PEN E-PL8 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2017-08-31 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 107 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410g (0.90 pounds) | 357g (0.79 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | 350 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $650 | $500 |