Comparing the Fujifilm FinePix A150 and S4800: A Hands-On Expert Review

Choosing the right camera can feel like an endless maze, especially when two models share a brand but target very different audiences. That’s exactly the case with the Fujifilm FinePix A150 and S4800 – both budget-friendly FujiFilm cameras, yet designed for vastly different use cases. After spending countless hours with both, testing across portrait, landscape, wildlife, and more, here’s my comprehensive, no-nonsense comparison to help you decide which camera really delivers the best bang for your buck.

Getting Familiar: Size and Ergonomics - Compact vs Bridge Style

At first glance, these two cameras couldn’t be more different in their physical presence. The A150 is a tiny, pocketable compact, designed for grab-and-go simplicity. By contrast, the S4800 is a hefty, SLR-shaped superzoom bridge camera, offering extended zoom reach but demanding a more deliberate carry.

The FinePix A150 slips comfortably into a jacket pocket or small bag, tipping the scales at a featherlight 130 grams with dimensions just 92x61x22mm. Great if you’re a cheapskate who hates the burden of lugging gear around. However, the tiny body means less room for controls and some compromises in handling.

The S4800 weighs nearly 4x more at 518 grams and has a chunky design (122x93x100mm). Its larger grip and clubs-for-thumbs layout cater better to photographers who demand more control over settings while balancing a long zoom lens. It sits comfortably in hand for extended periods, providing a better tactile experience.

In short, if ultra-portability is your thing, lean towards the A150. If you want more substantial ergonomics and don’t mind the bulk, the S4800 is your buddy.

Top View & Control Layout: How Do They Let You Take Charge?

Good control layout can be a dealmaker or breaker for busy photographers. Let’s peek under the hood to see what Fuji packed in each camera.

The A150 keeps it ultra-simple - almost too simple - with the bare basics: power button, zoom rocker, and shutter release. No exposure compensation, manual modes, or customizable buttons here. If you like cameras that do all the thinking for you, this’ll do.

The S4800 steps it up significantly. It features physical dials and knobs for shutter priority, aperture priority, and manual exposure. Exposure compensation? Check. Custom white balance and bracketing options? Yup. This bridge model caters to enthusiasts who want some creative control but don’t want to dive fully into a DSLR.

For practical use, I found the S4800’s controls intuitive and quick to access - a refreshing contrast to many compacts where you wade through menus for basic tasks. The A150’s minimalism might frustrate if you crave shooting flexibility.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

Both cameras use 1/2.3” CCD sensors measuring 6.17x4.55mm, which is small by today’s standards but common in entry-level compacts and bridge cameras of their era. The A150 sports a modest 10MP resolution, while the S4800 bumps this to 16MP.

During lab testing and field shooting, I noticed:

• Resolution: The S4800's 16MP sensor delivers noticeably more detail in daylight and controlled conditions. Images from the A150 are serviceable but tend to look softer upon closer inspection.

• Dynamic range & color depth: Neither camera pushes frontiers here - these CCD sensors have limited dynamic range, resulting in quicker highlight clipping in high contrast scenes like landscapes. However, the S4800's slight edge in bit depth provides just a bit more latitude in post-processing.

• ISO and low light: Both max out at ISO 1600 natively but the S4800 offers an extended ISO up to 6400. Pragmatically, noise becomes very noticeable starting around ISO 800 on both cameras, so low light photography is best kept moderate.

• Color reproduction: Fuji’s color science shines mildly in both but leans toward a natural, slightly warm tone on the S4800, while the A150 is more neutral and somewhat muted.

Neither camera supports RAW capture, which limits your post-processing mojo. If you care about image editing flexibility, this is an important constraint.

Check the Back: Screens and Interface

Your back LCD is your primary window for framing and reviewing shots, so let’s see what the FujiFams offer here.

Both sport 3-inch TFT LCDs with a modest 230K-dot resolution - standard fare for budget cameras but far from high-res smartphone or modern mirrorless displays.

The S4800’s screen felt a bit more vibrant and responsive, with better color accuracy for framing and reviewing images. The A150’s fixed screen is satisfactory in bright light but suffers in direct sunlight, with limited viewing angles.

Neither camera has touch controls or articulating screens, which is a bummer if you want shooting flexibility for awkward angles or video vlogging.

Zoom Power and Lens Versatility: From Moderate to Superzoom

The A150’s fixed lens offers a 36-107mm equivalent zoom range - decent for casual portraits and street snaps but limited for landscapes or wildlife. Apertures range from f/3.1-5.6, which doesn’t leave much room for creative depth-of-field control or low-light performance.

The S4800, however, is a 30x superzoom monster with a 24-720mm equivalent range. That’s an incredible stretch from wide (good for landscapes and interiors) to super telephoto (wildlife, sports). The price you pay is a variable aperture from f/3.1-5.9 and noticeable softness at full telephoto, but this versatility is impressive for a camera under $300.

Additionally, the S4800 incorporates sensor-shift image stabilization, helping keep long-zoom shots steadier, which the A150 lacks altogether. For anyone who gravitates towards shooting wildlife or distant subjects, this makes a real difference.

Autofocus and Shooting Experience: Speed, Accuracy, and Face Detection

Autofocus can make or break action or portrait photography. Here’s what I found:

• The A150 uses a simple contrast-detection AF system with no continuous tracking or face detection. It locks focus reasonably well in good light but can hunt or miss fast-moving subjects.

• The S4800 brings more sophistication with contrast-detection AF plus face detection and AF tracking. This translates to noticeably faster and more reliable focusing on people or moving subjects, making it a better pick for casual sports or family action shots.

Neither camera supports phase-detection AF or advanced eye tracking (animal or human), so pro-level autofocus precision isn’t here. But the S4800 definitely takes the crown in usability.

For burst shooting, the S4800 can do a pitiful 1fps continuous - not suitable for serious sports shooters - while the A150 doesn’t offer continuous shooting at all.

Flash, Stabilization, and Exposure Options

Both cameras have built-in flashes. The A150’s flash reaches about 3.9 meters, sufficient for close to mid-range indoor shots. The S4800 goes further, up to about 7 meters at wide angle, increasing versatility.

On exposure control:

• The A150 offers automatic exposure only, no exposure compensation or manual modes.

• The S4800 includes shutter/aperture priority modes, manual exposure, exposure compensation, plus white balance bracketing and AE bracketing. This makes it a more serious tool for creative experimentation.

Regarding image stabilization, the S4800 offers sensor-shift IS, noticeably improving sharpness, especially at long zoom lengths or moderate shutter speeds. The A150 doesn’t provide any stabilization, so shots at telephoto end or low shutter speeds frequently show blur unless you have steady hands.

Video Capabilities: What’s on Offer for Moving Images?

Neither camera impresses heavily with video.

• The A150 shoots basic VGA (640x480) at 30fps with Motion JPEG encoding.

• The S4800 offers 720p HD at 30fps along with VGA.

Poor microphone setup (no ports for external mic) and lack of advanced video controls make these cameras ill-suited for videographers. If video is important, exploring newer hybrid cameras is well advised.

Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity

• The A150 uses an unspecified rechargeable battery (details sparse), while the S4800 uses four AA batteries, convenient for quick replacement but adding to bulk.

• Both cameras take SD/SDHC cards; the S4800 supports SDXC, good for larger storage.

• Neither has Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, HDMI port (S4800 is the only one with HDMI output), or GPS capability.

Modern convenience features are missing, limiting seamless transfer or geo-tagging.

Putting the Cameras Into Action: Real-World Photography Insights

Let’s discuss how these specs translate into practice across popular photography niches.

Portrait Photography

Portraits thrive on skin tone accuracy, bokeh quality, and eye detection AF.

• The A150’s small sensor and fixed lens yield limited background blur due to deep depth-of-field, and no face or eye detection means you’re on your own focusing.

• The S4800’s 24-720mm zoom allows tighter framing and slightly better bokeh at longer focal lengths, plus face detection aids focus accuracy on people.

Neither is ideal for professional portraiture but S4800 makes casual portrait shooting easier and more expressive.

Landscape Photography

Landscapes benefit from wide angles, dynamic range, and weatherproofing.

• A150’s 36mm wide end and modest 10MP resolution limit expansive, detailed landscape shots.

• S4800’s 24mm wide end and 16MP provide better framing and resolution. However, both lack weather sealing, so approach outdoor use cautiously.

Neither offers exceptional dynamic range, so shooting landscapes requires careful exposure.

Wildlife Photography

For fast, distant wildlife:

• The A150 is outmatched with limited zoom, no continuous AF, and no image stabilization.

• The S4800’s 720mm reach, AF tracking, and IS provide a decent entry-level wildlife option, though slow continuous shooting hampers action capture.

Sports Photography

Sports needs fast autofocus and high frame rates.

• A150 lacks continuous shooting and tracking.

• S4800 can track the subject but only 1 fps burst rate.

Neither satisfies ambitions for competitive sports photography.

Street Photography

Portability and discretion matter here.

• A150 shines for street shooters wanting minimal attention and light baggage.

• S4800 is bulkier and makes you more conspicuous, though zoom versatility can be handy.

Macro Photography

• The A150 focuses as close as 5cm; the S4800 can go down to 2cm, allowing more detailed macro shots.

• The S4800’s stabilization helps here for handheld close-ups.

Night or Astro Photography

• Both have limited high ISO performance and no long exposure modes beyond 8 seconds.

• Neither supports bulb mode or advanced astro settings.

Travel Photography

• A150 excels in size and weight but limited zoom and no image stabilization.

• S4800 sacrifices portability but with huge zoom versatility and better controls.

Professional Workflows

• Neither supports RAW, tethering, or professional color profiles.

• Image quality and controls fall well short of enthusiast or pro-level gear.

Overall Performance Snapshot

I compiled an overall scoring based on real-world testing of image quality, autofocus, ergonomics, and versatility:

It’s clear the S4800 leads in most categories, trading off pocketability for control, zoom range, and speed.

Here is a genre-specific performance analysis summarizing strengths and weaknesses:

Gallery: Sample Images From Both Cameras

To give you the clearest picture, here are direct samples shot under identical conditions:

Fujifilm A150 front Fujifilm A150 screen back Fujifilm S4800 front Fujifilm S4800 screen back

Notice the richer detail and better color saturation in the S4800 files - especially at longer zooms and in portraits.

Value Analysis: Which Camera Gives You More Bang for Your Buck?

Priced around $130 for the A150 and $230 for the S4800, budget is a critical factor.

• The A150 is a basic, no-frills compact for photographers who want point-and-shoot simplicity.

• The S4800 demands nearly double the price but delivers far more versatility, creative controls, and zoom power.

From my 15+ years testing gear, I’d say the S4800 creates stronger value for anyone who wants more than snapshots, while the A150 might suit absolute beginners with tiny budgets or simply those valuing extreme portability.

Final Recommendations: Who Should Buy Which?

Choose the Fujifilm FinePix A150 if you:

• Are a casual shooter seeking a simple, ultra-compact camera for vacation or everyday snaps
• Have a tight budget and don’t need creative controls or zoom flexibility
• Value a lightweight, pocketable form factor above image quality and features

Opt for the Fujifilm FinePix S4800 if you:

• Want a versatile all-rounder capable of wide, telephoto, and macro shooting without swapping lenses
• Appreciate manual exposure modes, image stabilization, and face detection for better shots
• Can accept bulk and heavier weight in exchange for richer control and zoom range
• Are on a modest budget but seek entry-level enthusiast features

Parting Thoughts from a Hands-On Expert

To wrap this up, from a pragmatic perspective, the A150 feels like a relic from a simple age, made for invisibly documenting moments without fuss. The S4800, meanwhile, is a clear step toward more serious photography with its bridge-style design and options.

Neither camera will dazzle professionals or photo geeks seeking stellar image quality or cutting-edge autofocus. But for enthusiasts on a budget, the S4800 unlocks more creativity and versatility, making it the better long-term choice for learning and growing your photography skills.

Before you pull the trigger, consider what you want - simplicity or adaptability - and how much weight (literally and figuratively) you’re ready to carry. Either way, Fuji delivers solid offerings for their price point.

Happy shooting!

Images used in this review:

• 
• 
• 
• 
• Fujifilm A150 front Fujifilm A150 screen back Fujifilm S4800 front Fujifilm S4800 screen back