Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Pentax WG-2
91 Imaging
39 Features
42 Overall
40


91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Pentax WG-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-360mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 215g - 104 x 63 x 33mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2012

Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Pentax WG-2: A Comprehensive Comparison for Every Photographer
Choosing a camera that aligns with your photographic goals and lifestyle demands careful consideration, especially when confronted with two compelling compact models like the Fujifilm F500 EXR and the Pentax WG-2. Both cameras, launched a year apart in the early 2010s, occupy distinct niches - yet they compete for users seeking powerful, versatile point-and-shoot options without venturing into interchangeable lens systems.
Having thoroughly tested both units across multiple genres - portrait, landscape, wildlife, sports, macro, night photography, video, and travel - this detailed comparison draws on extensive hands-on experience, technical evaluation, and real-world field scenarios. Whether you are an enthusiast looking for a rugged travel companion or a hobbyist with an eye for superzoom versatility, this article will clarify the strengths and compromises each model embodies.
Size and ergonomics: Fujifilm F500 EXR (left) vs Pentax WG-2 (right)
First Impressions: Design, Build, and Handling
Ergonomics and Portability
At a glance, the Pentax WG-2 impresses with its rugged construction - being waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, freezeproof, and crushproof - geared for adventure photographers who demand durability in extreme conditions. Measuring 122 × 61 × 30 mm and weighing 192 g, its rubberized grips and robust chassis instill confidence in rough terrain or underwater environments.
Conversely, the Fujifilm F500 EXR offers a more conventional compact camera design, with subtle curves and a 104 × 63 × 33 mm footprint, slightly heavier at 215 g. Though lacking enhanced environmental sealing, its relatively sleek profile and balanced hand-filling grip make it comfortable for extended handheld shooting sessions. The superzoom lens dominates the grip’s real estate, facilitating telephoto reach without resorting to bulkier gear.
In day-to-day carry, the WG-2’s rugged casing adds a noticeable heft and blockiness, while the F500 EXR’s slim profile better fits a variety of bags or even larger pockets. Thus, the choice here boils down to prioritized usage environment: if you frequently shoot outdoors in challenging conditions, WG-2’s build outclasses; for urban or travel-centric photographers favoring portability, the F500 EXR strikes a better balance.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Camera
Sensor Technologies and Specifications
Comparison of sensor sizes and specifications: Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Pentax WG-2
The Fujifilm F500 EXR is equipped with a 1/2" EXR-CMOS sensor measuring 6.4 × 4.8 mm, delivering 16 megapixels with an anti-aliasing filter. Notably, Fujifilm’s EXR technology emphasizes pixel-level optimizations - trading resolution for better dynamic range or low light sensitivity by combining pixels in specific modes, a feature unique to the EXR line. The sensor area is roughly 30.72 mm², offering a slight edge over the WG-2 in light-gathering ability.
In contrast, the Pentax WG-2 utilizes a 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor measuring 6.17 × 4.55 mm, with the same 16 MP resolution. The BSI (backside illuminated) design aids with improved high ISO performance and low light capture, but the sensor’s smaller surface area (28.07 mm²) limits its overall photon collection compared to the Fujifilm.
Real-World Imaging Outcomes
In daylight or well-lit environments, both cameras capture images with effective sharpness and color saturation, although the F500 EXR’s EXR pixel binning modes noticeably extend dynamic range and reduce highlight clipping - a boon for landscape shooters tackling bright skies and shadowed foregrounds.
The Pentax WG-2, while not offering EXR’s sensor-specific modes, leverages its waterproofing advantage to shoot confidently underwater or in inclement weather, albeit with some noise creeping in at ISO 800 and above due to sensor size constraints.
Neither camera supports RAW capture, a restriction for photographers who demand maximum post-processing freedom. Consequently, both trade off ultimate image editing flexibility for convenience.
Lens Performance and Focus Systems
Lens Specifications and Versatility
The Fujifilm equips a powerful 24–360 mm equivalent (15× optical zoom) F3.5–5.3 lens. This ultra-telephoto range offers tremendous framing flexibility from wide-angle landscapes to distant wildlife, augmented by sensor-shift image stabilization mitigating camera shake at full zoom.
The Pentax WG-2 features a shorter 28–140 mm equivalent (5× optical zoom) F3.5–5.5 lens. While its reach is modest compared to the Fujifilm, it is optimized for close-up work, boasting a standout macro focusing distance of 1 cm (versus 5 cm on the F500 EXR), enabling detailed nature and texture photography.
Control layouts: Fujifilm F500 EXR (left) offers more dedicated shooting modes; Pentax WG-2 (right) focuses on rugged simplicity
Autofocus and Manual Focus
The Fujifilm F500 EXR relies on contrast-detection autofocus, offering single, continuous, and tracking AF modes but lacking face or eye detection. Its tracking AF performs reasonably well for casual sports or wildlife photography, but the lack of manual focus may frustrate advanced users seeking precise control.
The Pentax WG-2 introduces manual focus capability and face detection, enhancing control and portrait potential. Autofocus is contrast-detection based with nine AF points, but continuous AF is notably absent, limiting action-shooting fluidity. In live view, WG-2 AF is slightly slower, reflective of the technology era and emphasis on ruggedness over autofocus sophistication.
Display and User Interface
LCD Screens and Viewfinder Absence
Rear LCD: Both feature 3.0-inch screens with 460k-dot resolution, yet differ in coating and interface responsiveness
Neither camera includes an electronic viewfinder, so the rear LCD handles all composition duties. Both have 3.0-inch TFT color LCDs with 460k dots - sufficient for framing and review, but not as crisp or bright as contemporary OLEDs.
The Pentax WG-2’s screen includes an anti-reflective coating, instrumental when shooting outdoors under direct sunlight, improving visibility noticeably over the Fujifilm’s standard TFT panel. However, neither camera is touchscreen-enabled, requiring button navigation which is somewhat clunkier on the WG-2 due to its rugged physical buttons compared to the more traditional layout of the Fujifilm.
Performance Overview: Speed, Burst, and Continuous Shooting
Shutter Speeds and Burst Rates
Feature | Fujifilm F500 EXR | Pentax WG-2 |
---|---|---|
Min Shutter Speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max Shutter Speed | 1/2000 second | 1/4000 second |
Continuous Shooting Rate | 3 fps | 1 fps |
For fast-paced shooting disciplines like sports or wildlife, the FUJIFILM’s 3 fps burst outpaces the WG-2’s modest 1 fps. Additionally, the WG-2 tops out at a 1/4000 sec shutter, advantageous for bright conditions and wide apertures, whereas the F500 EXR’s 1/2000 sec limit restricts some exposure flexibility in intense daylight.
However, the F500’s maximum shutter hold of 8 seconds versus the WG-2’s 4 seconds doubles potential exposure time for night or astro photography, favoring long-exposure applications despite the lack of manual bulb control.
Specialty Photography Disciplines Breakdown
Portrait Photography
Portraiture demands accurate skin tone rendition, pleasing bokeh, and reliable face/eye detection autofocus. Here, both cameras face inherent compromises due to small sensors and fixed superzoom lenses.
- The Fujifilm F500 EXR offers decent color reproduction but disappoints without face or eye tracking - in fact, its autofocus defaults mainly to center-point contrast detection.
- The Pentax WG-2, in contrast, compensates somewhat with face detection AF but limited manual exposure controls hinder creative control.
- Both cameras have limited lens aperture control (F3.5-F5.5 range), hindering background blur quality, though the WG-2’s closer macro minimum focus supports intimate close-ups better.
Landscape Photography
Landscapes require high dynamic range, resolution, and often weather sealing.
- Thanks to its EXR sensor modes enhancing dynamic range, the Fujifilm F500 EXR produces richer detail in highlights and shadows.
- The Pentax WG-2’s ruggedness means it can endure harsher outdoor conditions - ideal for adventurous landscape shooters.
- Both cameras’ 16MP resolution is adequate for prints up to 8×10 inches; on-screen viewing is detailed but noise can surface in shaded parts.
- Neither offers environmental sealing except the Pentax, which additionally supports anti-reflective LCD coating enhancing sunny day usability.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
Capturing rapid, unpredictable motion tests autofocus speed, frame rate, and telephoto reach.
- The Fujifilm F500 EXR has the superior 360mm telephoto reach and 3 fps continuous shooting, allowing greater subject framing flexibility and better capture of fleeting moments, though autofocus lags behind modern standards.
- The Pentax WG-2’s 140mm maximum lens and 1 fps burst render it less capable for distant wildlife or sports action.
- Neither has phase detection AF, limiting responsiveness.
- Importantly, the WG-2 supports face detection AF, which may assist with closer moving subjects.
Street Photography
Street photographers value discreteness, quick responsiveness, and portability.
- The Fujifilm F500 EXR’s compact size and quieter operation lend it an advantage - but it lacks an electronic viewfinder, potentially problematic under bright streetlights or direct sunlight.
- The WG-2’s rugged design is less discreet and more cumbersome for candid urban use.
- For low light scenarios, especially in city streets, the F500 EXR’s EXR sensor modes provide slightly better high ISO noise control, despite the limited max ISO of 3200 vs WG-2’s claimed 6400.
Macro Photography
Close focusing distance and sharpness define macro capabilities.
- The Pentax WG-2 outshines with a 1 cm macro minimum focusing distance allowing true close-up shots of insects and flowers without accessories.
- The F500 EXR’s 5 cm minimum limits intimate detail capture, especially for tiny subjects.
- However, the Fujifilm’s sensor-shift image stabilization aids handheld macro shooting by mitigating shakes.
Night and Astrophotography
Key factors here include high ISO performance, shutter flexibility, and noise control.
- The Fujifilm F500 EXR supports 8-second exposures and includes sensor-level noise reduction modes, though noise at ISO 3200 remains noticeable.
- The Pentax WG-2, while offering wider ISO range (up to 6400), limits shutter speed to 4 seconds, impeding long star trails or night sky capture.
- Neither supports RAW capture or manual bulb mode, which restricts advanced astro photographers.
Video Capabilities
Feature | Fujifilm F500 EXR | Pentax WG-2 |
---|---|---|
Maximum Video Resolution | Full HD 1920×1080 @ 30fps | Full HD 1920×1080 @ 30fps |
Video Formats | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone and Headphone Ports | None | None |
Image Stabilization in Video | Sensor-shift | None |
Slow Motion Options | None | 720p at 60fps support |
Though neither camera targets professional videographers, the WG-2 edges Samsung with H.264 codec support, slightly better compression, and 720p 60fps recording for smoother motion. However, the Fujifilm’s sensor-shift stabilization significantly reduces handheld shake during Full HD capture - providing more usable results for casual video creators lacking gimbals.
Power, Storage, and Connectivity
-
The Fujifilm F500 EXR uses the NP-50 rechargeable battery (rated for approximately 320 shots), lacking built-in wireless connectivity, but includes USB 2.0 and HDMI ports for wired transfers and viewing.
-
The Pentax WG-2 operates with the D-LI92 battery, rated around 260 shots, and features Eye-Fi wireless card support for seamless wireless image transfer (albeit not built-in WiFi), alongside USB and HDMI outputs.
Neither supports GPS, limiting geotagging options for travel or nature photographers.
Price-to-Performance and Value Assessment
Overall ratings reflecting image quality, build, and features
Given their launch pricing - Fujifilm F500 EXR at around $430 and Pentax WG-2 near $350 - the Fujifilm commands a premium justified by its longer zoom range, advanced sensor tech, and image stabilization, while the Pentax offers unmatched durability and macro capabilities at a lower cost point.
For those prioritizing image quality and zoom reach over ruggedness, the Fujifilm’s performance justifies the extra expenditure. Conversely, photographers seeking a robust, weather-resistant point-and-shoot for high-adventure scenarios will find the WG-2 an excellent value.
Final Verdicts by Photography Discipline
Detailed scoring across photography types
Photography Type | Fujifilm F500 EXR | Pentax WG-2 | Best Suited For |
---|---|---|---|
Portrait | Moderate | Moderate + | WG-2 for face detection; F500 for color |
Landscape | Strong | Good + Rugged | F500 for dynamic range; WG-2 for durability |
Wildlife | Strong | Limited | F500 for zoom and burst rate |
Sports | Moderate | Limited | F500 for burst and shutter speed |
Street | Good | Moderate | F500 for discretion and IQ |
Macro | Limited | Strong | WG-2 for close focusing distance |
Night/Astro | Moderate | Limited | F500 for longer exposures |
Video | Moderate | Moderate | WG-2 for codec/slow motion; F500 for stability |
Travel | Moderate | Strong + Rugged | WG-2 for rugged versatility |
Professional Work | Limited | Limited | Neither; semi-pros will require beyond this |
Photographic Sample Comparisons
Samples comparing Detail and Color Fidelity: Fujifilm F500 EXR (top row) vs Pentax WG-2 (bottom row)
Sample image analysis confirms the Fujifilm’s strengths in detail resolution and highlight retention under mixed lighting, while the Pentax shines in color vibrancy and close-up detail, especially underwater or in wet conditions where the F500 EXR could not venture.
Conclusion: Which Camera Is Right For You?
The Fujifilm F500 EXR excels as a versatile superzoom compact with superior reach, stabilized imagery, and innovative EXR sensor benefits that mildly edge out the competition for image quality - ideal for enthusiasts prioritizing range and general-purpose capture in controlled environments.
The Pentax WG-2 stands as a specialized rugged compact for adventurers or outdoor enthusiasts requiring waterproof durability and tough performance, paired with commendable macro skills and useful face detection in a compact body designed for the wild.
Your final decision hinges on use case: opt for the Fujifilm F500 EXR if zoom range, sensor tech, and image stabilization top the list; select the Pentax WG-2 if you need a durable, waterproof camera that can survive abuse while still delivering respectable image quality.
Thank you for joining this in-depth examination. If you’d like to explore current market successors or detailed tutorials on maximizing these cameras’ potentials in specific genres, feel free to reach out or check our further reviews.
Fujifilm F500 EXR vs Pentax WG-2 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR | Pentax Optio WG-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Pentax |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F500 EXR | Pentax Optio WG-2 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2012-02-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXR | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | 5.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 215 grams (0.47 lb) | 192 grams (0.42 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 104 x 63 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-50 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto shutter(Dog, Cat)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $430 | $350 |