Fujifilm F770EXR vs Kodak Z950
90 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10a09/10a0992a47b8db64226cfb5ebab18398483afc19" alt="Fujifilm FinePix F770EXR front Fujifilm FinePix F770EXR front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22679/226798dc2169a13f9c95c42c23e66e6087c13ce4" alt="Kodak EasyShare Z950 front Kodak EasyShare Z950 front"
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Fujifilm F770EXR vs Kodak Z950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 234g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Released January 2012
- Renewed by Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Introduced June 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Fujifilm F770EXR vs Kodak Z950 Overview
Here is a extensive review of the Fujifilm F770EXR versus Kodak Z950, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors FujiFilm and Kodak. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm F770EXR (16MP) and Z950 (12MP) and the Fujifilm F770EXR (1/2") and Z950 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The Fujifilm F770EXR was manufactured 19 months later than the Z950 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short overview of how the Fujifilm F770EXR grades against the Z950 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Fujifilm F770EXR vs Kodak Z950 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix F770EXR & Kodak EasyShare Z950. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F770EXR Gallery & Kodak Z950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F770EXR over the Kodak Z950
Fujifilm F770EXR | Z950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | ![]() | June 2010 | Fresher by 19 months |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the Fujifilm F770EXR
Z950 | Fujifilm F770EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm F770EXR and Kodak Z950
Fujifilm F770EXR | Z950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm F770EXR vs Kodak Z950 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm F770EXR comes with outside dimensions of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 234 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Kodak Z950 has sizing of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm F770EXR versus Kodak Z950 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm F770EXR compared to the Z950.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eab41/eab41cc2373cc5d88f32b745ce4f77f6818fd445" alt="Fujifilm F770EXR vs Kodak Z950 size comparison Fujifilm F770EXR vs Kodak Z950 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F770EXR and Z950 is 90 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37df6/37df6e21f17bf033f2570604aa21ffe1fbd3d971" alt="Fujifilm F770EXR vs Kodak Z950 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm F770EXR vs Kodak Z950 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm F770EXR vs Kodak Z950 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to picture the difference in sensor sizing just by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F770EXR and Z950.
As you can see, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F770EXR featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Fujifilm F770EXR will render more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm F770EXR should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d62e3/d62e387f568ff885b82eecaefc6385e52f14914f" alt="Fujifilm F770EXR vs Kodak Z950 sensor size comparison Fujifilm F770EXR vs Kodak Z950 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm F770EXR vs Kodak Z950 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1809/a18097f98b727b126f0d490784fe2d60d85a64db" alt="Fujifilm F770EXR vs Kodak Z950 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm F770EXR vs Kodak Z950 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Fujifilm F770EXR vs Kodak Z950 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F770EXR | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Kodak |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix F770EXR | Kodak EasyShare Z950 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-01-05 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 6cm |
Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 1/8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1250 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 11.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 5.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 234 grams (0.52 lbs) | 243 grams (0.54 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-50A | KLIC-7003 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $480 | $250 |