Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus VR-320
90 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44


94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Announced July 2012
- Superseded the Fujifilm F770EXR
- New Model is Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Newer Model is Olympus VR-330

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Fujifilm F800EXR versus Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F800EXR (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly well matched but the Fujifilm F800EXR (1/2") and VR-320 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.

The Fujifilm F800EXR was announced 13 months later than the VR-320 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the Fujifilm F800EXR grades against the VR-320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR and Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm F800EXR Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F800EXR over the Olympus VR-320
Fujifilm F800EXR | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2012 | ![]() | July 2011 | More recent by 13 months |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm F800EXR
VR-320 | Fujifilm F800EXR |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm F800EXR and Olympus VR-320
Fujifilm F800EXR | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F800EXR offers outside dimensions of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm F800EXR versus Olympus VR-320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm F800EXR vs the VR-320.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F800EXR and VR-320 is 90 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements only by reading through specs. The photograph here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F800EXR and VR-320.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F800EXR using its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Fujifilm F800EXR will resolve extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm F800EXR should have an edge in sensor innovation.

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Olympus VR-320 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2012-07-25 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXR | TruePic III |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 11.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lbs) | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 41 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 19.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.9 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 143 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-50A | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $330 | $179 |