Clicky

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
50
Overall
44
Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
  • 232g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
  • Announced July 2012
  • Superseded the Fujifilm F770EXR
  • New Model is Fujifilm F900EXR
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched July 2011
  • Newer Model is Olympus VR-330
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Let's look a little more closely at the Fujifilm F800EXR versus Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F800EXR (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly well matched but the Fujifilm F800EXR (1/2") and VR-320 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The Fujifilm F800EXR was announced 13 months later than the VR-320 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the Fujifilm F800EXR grades against the VR-320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm F800EXR over the Olympus VR-320

 Fujifilm F800EXR VR-320 
LaunchedJuly 2012July 2011More recent by 13 months
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm F800EXR

 VR-320 Fujifilm F800EXR 

Common features in the Fujifilm F800EXR and Olympus VR-320

 Fujifilm F800EXR VR-320 
Focus manually Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display sizing
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F800EXR offers outside dimensions of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Compare the Fujifilm F800EXR versus Olympus VR-320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm F800EXR vs the VR-320.

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F800EXR and VR-320 is 90 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements only by reading through specs. The photograph here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F800EXR and VR-320.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F800EXR using its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Fujifilm F800EXR will resolve extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm F800EXR should have an edge in sensor innovation.

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm F800EXR Portrait photography advice
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography advice
44
good resolution (16MP)
provides face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
no manual focus
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2")
33
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
has face detection focus
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Fujifilm F800EXR Street photography information
Olympus VR-320 Street photography information
68
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
lighter than competitors (232g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2")
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (158g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm F800EXR Sports photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography highlights
53
incredible zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
sensor size is very small (1/2")
no phase detect autofocus
47
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm F800EXR Travel photography info
Olympus VR-320 Travel photography info
69
lighter than competitors (232g)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (25mm)
very long reach (500mm)
missing Timelapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
70
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm F800EXR Landscape photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography highlights
50
quite wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (16MP)
saves RAW formats
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
sensor size is very small (1/2")
missing Timelapse mode
42
decently wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14MP)
no manual focus
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual exposure
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm F800EXR Vlogging advice
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging advice
34
quite wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors (232g)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
missing external microphone port
32
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focus
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm F800EXR vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F800EXR and Olympus VR-320
 Fujifilm FinePix F800EXROlympus VR-320
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR Olympus VR-320
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2012-07-25 2011-07-19
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by EXR TruePic III
Sensor type EXRCMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 30.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Max enhanced ISO 12800 -
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-500mm (20.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.3 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing distance 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.6 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology TFT color LCD monitor TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 11.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) 4.70 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 232 grams (0.51 lbs) 158 grams (0.35 lbs)
Dimensions 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 41 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 19.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.9 not tested
DXO Low light rating 143 not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photos -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-50A LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $330 $179