Clicky

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-310

Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR front
 
Olympus TG-310 front
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs

Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
  • 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
  • Introduced January 2013
  • Superseded the Fujifilm F800EXR
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-310 Overview

Lets take a closer look at the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-310, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is fairly similar but the Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") and TG-310 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The Fujifilm F900EXR was released 2 years later than the TG-310 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the Fujifilm F900EXR grades versus the TG-310 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Olympus TG-310

		

		

			
 Fujifilm F900EXR TG-310 
RevealedJanuary 2013January 2011More recent by 26 months
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Fujifilm F900EXR

		

		

			
 TG-310 Fujifilm F900EXR 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus TG-310

		

		

			
 Fujifilm F900EXR TG-310 
Focus manually  Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen  No selfie screen
Touch friendly display  Neither comes with Touch friendly display
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
For those who are intending to lug around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F900EXR comes with physical dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus TG-310 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-310 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm F900EXR versus the TG-310.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F900EXR and TG-310 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Generally, it can be difficult to imagine the difference between sensor measurements only by reading a spec sheet. The photograph here will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm F900EXR and TG-310.
As you can see, both of those cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F900EXR featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Fujifilm F900EXR will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm F900EXR should have an edge in sensor technology.
	
			Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Portrait photography features
Olympus TG-310 Portrait photography features
44
 sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
 includes face detection focus
 delivers RAW formats
 manual focus not available
 no external flash support
 sensor size is very small (1/2")
33
 good  resolution (14MP)
 features face detection focus
 no manual focus
 no manual control
 external flash not possible
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Street Comparison
 Fujifilm F900EXR as a Street photography camera
 Olympus TG-310 as a Street photography camera
68
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 delivers RAW formats
 lighter than competitors in class (232 grams)
 screen does not articulate
 sensor size is very small (1/2")
66
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 environment proofing
 lighter than competition (155g)
 no moving screen
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sports Comparison
Sports photography with Fujifilm F900EXR
Sports photography with Olympus TG-310
55
 incredible zoom range (25-500mm  20.0 x zoom)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
 includes tracking autofocus
 supports phase detect auto focus
 sensor size is very small (1/2")
 terrible battery life (260 shots)
40
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good  resolution (14MP)
 features tracking autofocus
 environment proofing
 continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames/s)
 no shutter priority
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 not so great battery life (150 shots)
 lack of phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Travel Comparison
 Fujifilm F900EXR as a Travel photography camera
 Olympus TG-310 as a Travel photography camera
66
 lighter than competitors in class (232g)
 sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
 built-in flash
 really wide (25mm)
 very long reach (500mm)
 lack of Time Lapse function
 terrible battery life (260 shots)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
67
 lighter than competition (155g)
 environment proofing
 good  resolution (14 megapixels)
 has built in flash
 decently wide (28mm)
 no Time Lapse function
 not so great battery life (150 CIPA)
 does not have selfie friendly display
 slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Landscape Comparison
Fujifilm F900EXR Landscape photography features
Olympus TG-310 Landscape photography features
47
 really wide (25mm)
 screen size is decent (3 inch)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
 delivers RAW formats
 manual focus not available
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
 sensor size is very small (1/2")
 terrible battery life (260 per charge)
 lack of Time Lapse function
39
 decently wide (28mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 good  resolution (14 megapixels)
 environment proofing
 no manual focus
 can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
 small screen (2.7 inch)
 no manual control
 very small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
 not so great battery life (150 shots)
 no Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Vlogging Comparison
 Fujifilm F900EXR as a Vlogging camera
 Olympus TG-310 as a Vlogging camera
34
 really wide (25mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 includes face detection focus
 video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
 lighter than competitors in class (232g)
 slow max aperture (f3.5)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 lack of external mic port
32
 decently wide (28mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 features face detection focus
 lighter than competition (155 grams)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
 does not have selfie friendly display
 video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
 no external mic port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	

		

			
Fujifilm F900EXR vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F900EXR and Olympus TG-310
 Fujifilm FinePix F900EXROlympus TG-310
General Information
Company FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR Olympus TG-310
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Introduced 2013-01-30 2011-01-06
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by EXR II TruePic III+
Sensor type EXRCMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 30.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 -
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Max enhanced ISO 12800 -
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW files    
Autofocusing
Manual focusing    
AF touch    
Continuous AF    
AF single    
AF tracking    
AF selectice    
Center weighted AF    
AF multi area    
Live view AF    
Face detect AF    
Contract detect AF    
Phase detect AF    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-500mm (20.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Maximal aperture f/3.5-5.3 f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing distance 5cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.6 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 920 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch friendly    
Display technology TFT color LCD monitor TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 11.0 frames per second 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash distance 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) 4.20 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash    
AE bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic jack    
Headphone jack    
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 232 gr (0.51 lb) 155 gr (0.34 lb)
Dimensions 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 260 photographs 150 photographs
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-50A LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature    
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Price at release $380 $0