Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic 3D1
Portability
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Portability
93 Imaging
36 Features
36 Overall
36
93 Imaging
36 Features
36 Overall
36
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic 3D1 Key Specs
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
Panasonic 3D1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 193g - 108 x 58 x 24mm
- Introduced November 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic 3D1 Overview
Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic 3D1, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the 3D1 (12MP) is pretty comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and 3D1 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-2 iHS was revealed 14 months after the 3D1 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick view of how the XZ-2 iHS grades against the 3D1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic 3D1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1. The full galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Panasonic 3D1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Panasonic 3D1
| XZ-2 iHS | 3D1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | December 2012 |  | November 2011 | More modern by 14 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic 3D1 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| 3D1 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Panasonic 3D1
| XZ-2 iHS | 3D1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic 3D1 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides outer dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) and the Panasonic 3D1 has specifications of 108mm x 58mm x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus Panasonic 3D1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the 3D1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and 3D1 is 85 and 93 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic 3D1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes simply by going through a spec sheet. The image here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and 3D1.
Clearly, both of these cameras offer the same exact megapixels albeit different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS offers the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallower depth of field easier. The newer XZ-2 iHS provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic 3D1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic 3D1 as a Portrait photography camera
focusing manually
includes face detection focus
supports RAW files
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
has face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography highlights
Panasonic 3D1 Street photography highlights
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
more heavy than competitors in class (346 grams)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers touch to focus
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Sports photography with Panasonic 3D1
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking autofocus
great battery pack (340 per charge)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect auto focus
has image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking autofocus
low max shutter speed (1/1,300 seconds)
no shutter priority
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (200 shots)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Travel photography with Panasonic 3D1
great battery pack (340 shots)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors in class (346 grams)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
offers touch to focus
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
terrible battery life (200 per charge)
low MP (12 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography advice
Panasonic 3D1 Landscape photography advice
focusing manually
decently wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
great battery pack (340 shots)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
does not have Timelapse recording
rather wide (25mm)
screen larger than average (3.5 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
no manual control
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
terrible battery life (200 per charge)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Vlogging with Panasonic 3D1
decently wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does have external microphone support
display isn't selfie friendly
more heavy than competitors in class (346g)
rather wide (25mm)
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external microphone jack
Photography Glossary
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Panasonic 3D1 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2011-11-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.9-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3.5" |
| Screen resolution | 920k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Full Touch Screen with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1300 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lb) | 193 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 108 x 58 x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 images | 200 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $450 | $670 |