Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Nikon A900
59 Imaging
40 Features
57 Overall
46
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Nikon A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 687g - 131 x 97 x 126mm
- Announced January 2013
- Succeeded the Fujifilm HS30EXR
- Newer Model is Fujifilm HS50 EXR
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Launched February 2016
- Updated by Nikon A1000
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Nikon A900 Overview
The following is a extended review of the Fujifilm HS35EXR versus Nikon A900, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands FujiFilm and Nikon. The resolution of the Fujifilm HS35EXR (16MP) and the A900 (20MP) is very close but the Fujifilm HS35EXR (1/2") and A900 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm HS35EXR was launched 4 years before the A900 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm HS35EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Nikon A900 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a full comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the Fujifilm HS35EXR scores versus the A900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Nikon A900 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR and Nikon Coolpix A900. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm HS35EXR Gallery and Nikon A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm HS35EXR over the Nikon A900
Fujifilm HS35EXR | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Fujifilm HS35EXR
A900 | Fujifilm HS35EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | January 2013 | Newer by 38 months | |
Display resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer display (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm HS35EXR and Nikon A900
Fujifilm HS35EXR | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Nikon A900 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you should take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm HS35EXR enjoys exterior dimensions of 131mm x 97mm x 126mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 5.0") having a weight of 687 grams (1.51 lbs) while the Nikon A900 has specifications of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm HS35EXR versus Nikon A900 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm HS35EXR against the A900.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm HS35EXR and A900 is 59 and 88 respectively.
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Nikon A900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions simply by viewing technical specs. The picture underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm HS35EXR and A900.
As you can tell, both cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm HS35EXR featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Nikon A900 will provide you with more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm HS35EXR will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Nikon A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Nikon A900 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR | Nikon Coolpix A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Nikon |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR | Nikon Coolpix A900 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-01-07 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXR | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 24-840mm (35.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.4-6.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor with Sunny Day mode | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 11.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.10 m (Wide: 30cm - 7.1m / Tele: 2.0m - 3.8m ) | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 687g (1.51 pounds) | 289g (0.64 pounds) |
Dimensions | 131 x 97 x 126mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 5.0") | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 600 shots | 300 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-W126 | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $380 | $400 |