Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Nikon S9300
Portability
59 Imaging
40 Features
57 Overall
46
59 Imaging
40 Features
57 Overall
46
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
91 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Nikon S9300 Key Specs
Fujifilm HS35EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 687g - 131 x 97 x 126mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Replaced the Fujifilm HS30EXR
- Updated by Fujifilm HS50 EXR
Nikon S9300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 215g - 109 x 62 x 31mm
- Released July 2012
- Earlier Model is Nikon S9100
- Later Model is Nikon S9500
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Nikon S9300 Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Fujifilm HS35EXR versus Nikon S9300, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Nikon. The image resolution of the Fujifilm HS35EXR (16MP) and the S9300 (16MP) is pretty comparable but the Fujifilm HS35EXR (1/2") and S9300 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm HS35EXR was introduced 6 months later than the S9300 so they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm HS35EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Nikon S9300 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the Fujifilm HS35EXR matches up versus the S9300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Nikon S9300 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR and Nikon Coolpix S9300. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm HS35EXR Gallery and Nikon S9300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm HS35EXR over the Nikon S9300
| Fujifilm HS35EXR | S9300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9300 over the Fujifilm HS35EXR
| S9300 | Fujifilm HS35EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm HS35EXR and Nikon S9300
| Fujifilm HS35EXR | S9300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | July 2012 | Same generation |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Nikon S9300 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm HS35EXR comes with external measurements of 131mm x 97mm x 126mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 5.0") having a weight of 687 grams (1.51 lbs) whilst the Nikon S9300 has sizing of 109mm x 62mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm HS35EXR versus Nikon S9300 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm HS35EXR compared to the S9300.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm HS35EXR and S9300 is 59 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Nikon S9300 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements merely by going through specifications. The visual here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm HS35EXR and S9300.
Plainly, the 2 cameras come with the identical megapixels albeit not the same sensor measurements. The Fujifilm HS35EXR comes with the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallower DOF easier.
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Nikon S9300 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm HS35EXR as a Portrait photography camera
Nikon S9300 as a Portrait photography camera
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
provides face detection focus
saves RAW files
sensor is small (1/2")
decent MP (16MP)
comes with face detect focus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Fujifilm HS35EXR Street photography info
Nikon S9300 Street photography info
screen tilts
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
sensor is small (1/2")
heavier than competition in class (687 grams)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (215 grams)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Sports photography with Fujifilm HS35EXR
Sports photography with Nikon S9300
excellent zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
good battery (600 shots)
sensor is small (1/2")
no phase detect auto focus
long zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (200 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Fujifilm HS35EXR as a Travel photography camera
Nikon S9300 as a Travel photography camera
good battery (600 shots)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
long zoom (720mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (687 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
lighter than competition in class (215 grams)
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
long reach (450mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
not so great battery pack (200 CIPA)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Fujifilm HS35EXR
Landscape photography with Nikon S9300
has manual focus
really wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
saves RAW files
good battery (600 CIPA)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor is small (1/2")
does not have Time Lapse mode
really wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual exposure
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
not so great battery pack (200 per charge)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Fujifilm HS35EXR
Vlogging with Nikon S9300
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have external mic socket
heavier than competition in class (687 grams)
really wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition in class (215 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Nikon S9300 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR | Nikon Coolpix S9300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR | Nikon Coolpix S9300 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-01-07 | 2012-07-16 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 4cm |
| Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor with Sunny Day mode | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.0 frames per second | 6.9 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.10 m (Wide: 30cm - 7.1m / Tele: 2.0m - 3.8m ) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 687 gr (1.51 lbs) | 215 gr (0.47 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 131 x 97 x 126mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 5.0") | 109 x 62 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 600 images | 200 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-W126 | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $380 | $249 |
